本文選題：內(nèi)容價(jià)值 + 經(jīng)濟(jì)類期刊　； 參考：《中國記者》2016年11期

【摘要】：在"技術(shù)決定論"盛行的當(dāng)下,好奇心日報(bào)的伊險(xiǎn)峰不太一樣。作為一名資深媒體人,他從經(jīng)濟(jì)類雜志轉(zhuǎn)場新媒體,工作的內(nèi)容和性質(zhì)卻沒有發(fā)生實(shí)質(zhì)性變化:還是一樣地做內(nèi)容,仍然通過記者原創(chuàng)內(nèi)容來吸引用戶。表面上看,甚至只是把一本雜志"搬"到了手機(jī)上。伊險(xiǎn)峰把內(nèi)容價(jià)值當(dāng)成"信仰",但這并不妨礙市場的認(rèn)可。目前,好奇心日報(bào)已經(jīng)順利完成天使輪和A輪融資�！吨袊浾摺穼υ捯岭U(xiǎn)峰,聽聽他怎么看待內(nèi)容價(jià)值與媒體轉(zhuǎn)型的關(guān)系,他又是如何在自身的轉(zhuǎn)型中觀察媒體和媒體人。
[Abstract]:At a time when technological determinism is prevalent, the Irism peak of the Journal of curiosity is not quite the same. As a veteran media man, he moved from economics magazine to new media, but the content and nature of his work has not changed materially: still doing the same, still attracting users through original content by journalists. On the face of it, even a magazine was moved to the phone. The risk peak regards the content value as "belief", but this does not hinder the market approval. At present, the Journal of curiosity has successfully completed the angel round and round A financing. "China reporter" talks with the "Erisome Peak" to hear how he views the relationship between the value of content and the media transformation, and how he observes the media and media people in his own transformation.
【分類號】：G206

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王棋;;媒體微信的內(nèi)容價(jià)值與呈現(xiàn)途徑[J];新聞戰(zhàn)線;2014年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張光照;媒體融合進(jìn)程中的內(nèi)容價(jià)值體系重構(gòu)[D];暨南大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：1941973