本文選題：文化產(chǎn)業(yè) + 效率��； 參考：《廈門大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)近年來發(fā)展迅速,已成為我國全方位發(fā)展道路上不可或缺的一部分。不管是在產(chǎn)業(yè)形態(tài)、消費(fèi)市場、產(chǎn)品類型,還是在理論研究、觀念轉(zhuǎn)變和區(qū)域布局等領(lǐng)域,文化產(chǎn)業(yè)都帶來了巨大的社會(huì)效益和經(jīng)濟(jì)效益。假如把上世紀(jì)末認(rèn)定為文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的開端,本世紀(jì)的前十年則是中國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)快速發(fā)展的成長期。2003年起,各級(jí)政府開始有意識(shí)地將文化產(chǎn)業(yè)列為經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重點(diǎn),并陸續(xù)出臺(tái)了一系列促進(jìn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的方針政策。2003-2009年也被認(rèn)定為是我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的改革推動(dòng)階段,之后便進(jìn)入大發(fā)展階段。 本文根據(jù)時(shí)期的劃分,并結(jié)合數(shù)據(jù)的可得性,選取了2003-2009年作為我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率研究的時(shí)期。依據(jù)三階段DEA和Malmqusit指數(shù)模型的要求,選取了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)增加值和文化產(chǎn)業(yè)總收入作為產(chǎn)出變量,文化產(chǎn)業(yè)固定資產(chǎn)投資和文化產(chǎn)業(yè)工資福利支出作為投入變量。通過對(duì)各省市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率橫向和縱向的分析,全面了解我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展情況。另外,采用三階段DEA模型的原因在于,各省市文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的外部環(huán)境條件不同,加之還有各類不可測因素。通過第二階段的調(diào)整,分離出來的管理效率更能反映出我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率的真實(shí)水平。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于采用三階段DEA模型對(duì)我國連續(xù)七年的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率進(jìn)行了橫縱兩個(gè)方面的分析,目前在國內(nèi)文獻(xiàn)中相關(guān)研究成果較少。根據(jù)相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)分析結(jié)果,得出了各類環(huán)境因素對(duì)我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率的影響,并對(duì)各省市效率進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析。提出的建議包括轉(zhuǎn)變觀念、改變政府角色、擴(kuò)大文化企業(yè)規(guī)模、發(fā)展第三產(chǎn)業(yè),解決區(qū)域發(fā)展問題以及提升國際競爭力等。
[Abstract]:China's cultural industry has developed rapidly in recent years and has become an indispensable part of China's all-round development. Whether in industrial form, consumer market, product type, or in the field of theoretical research, concept change and regional layout, cultural industry has brought great social and economic benefits. If the end of the last century is regarded as the beginning of the development of cultural industry, the first decade of this century will be the period of rapid development of China's cultural industry. Since 2003, governments at all levels have consciously listed cultural industry as the focus of economic development. A series of principles and policies to promote the development of cultural industry have been issued successively. 2003-2009 has also been recognized as the stage of reform and promotion of the development of cultural industry in China, and then entered the stage of great development. According to the division of period and the availability of data, this paper selects 2003-2009 as the period of cultural industry efficiency research in China. According to the requirements of three-stage DEA and Malmqusit index model, the added value of cultural industry and total income of cultural industry are selected as output variables, and fixed assets investment and wage and welfare expenditure of cultural industry as input variables. Through the horizontal and vertical analysis of the cultural industry efficiency in various provinces and cities, the development of cultural industry in China is fully understood. In addition, the reason for adopting the three-stage DEA model is that the external environmental conditions of the development of cultural industry in different provinces and cities are different, together with various unmeasurable factors. Through the adjustment of the second stage, the separated management efficiency can reflect the real level of China's cultural industry efficiency. The innovation of this paper lies in the use of three-stage DEA model to analyze the cultural industry efficiency for seven consecutive years in China. According to the analysis results of relevant data, this paper concludes the influence of various environmental factors on the efficiency of China's cultural industry, and makes a comparative analysis of the efficiency of various provinces and cities. The suggestions include changing ideas, changing the role of government, expanding the scale of cultural enterprises, developing tertiary industry, solving regional development problems and enhancing international competitiveness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：G124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 錢正武;楊吉華;;我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的制定及其實(shí)施[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

2 郭國峰;鄭召鋒;;我國中部六省文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展績效評(píng)價(jià)與研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年12期

3 李江帆;文化產(chǎn)業(yè):范圍、前景與互動(dòng)效應(yīng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2003年04期

4 馬萱;鄭世林;;中國區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)效率研究綜述與展望[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2010年03期

5 顏鵬飛,王兵;技術(shù)效率、技術(shù)進(jìn)步與生產(chǎn)率增長:基于DEA的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年12期

6 凌金鑄;;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)政策創(chuàng)新的實(shí)踐與體系[J];南京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

7 楊吉華;;論我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的缺失及完善途徑[J];南京政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

8 張建中;李曉;;我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)現(xiàn)狀、問題及對(duì)策研究[J];江西理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

9 何里文;袁曉玲;鄧敏慧;;中國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率變動(dòng)、區(qū)域差異分析——基于Malmquist生產(chǎn)力指數(shù)的分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2012年09期

10 胡惠林;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展與國家文化安全——全球化背景下中國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展問題思考[J];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院學(xué)術(shù)季刊;2000年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄧安球;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展理論研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 柳青;西部地區(qū)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展效率評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1900889