發(fā)布時(shí)間：2017-12-31 00:08

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資對(duì)我國(guó)創(chuàng)業(yè)板市場(chǎng)IPO公司業(yè)績(jī)的影響　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資 創(chuàng)業(yè)板 IPO業(yè)績(jī)

【摘要】：近年來國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資對(duì)IPO的影響給予了高度的關(guān)注,IPO抑價(jià)和IPO的市場(chǎng)表現(xiàn)及其影響因素的研究一直是國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者研究的熱點(diǎn)問題。隨著國(guó)際范圍內(nèi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資的迅速發(fā)展以及作為其重要退出渠道的IPO的不斷完善,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資在公司IPO過程中所起到功效越來越受到各國(guó)學(xué)者的關(guān)注。全球范圍內(nèi)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資對(duì)IPO的影響主要可分為正面影響的“認(rèn)證/監(jiān)督模型”假說和負(fù)面影響的“逆向選擇/逐名效應(yīng)”假說,不同的市場(chǎng)數(shù)據(jù),不同的制度背景得出的結(jié)論有所差異,由于我國(guó)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資發(fā)展的比較晚,尚未成熟,對(duì)于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資對(duì)我國(guó)公司IPO的影響還需要做進(jìn)一步的研究。本文將基于創(chuàng)業(yè)板市場(chǎng)為研究對(duì)象,研究風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資對(duì)公司IPO前后業(yè)績(jī)的影響。 我國(guó)的創(chuàng)業(yè)板起步比較晚,其建立是為高新技術(shù)及高科技的中小規(guī)模的企業(yè)上市融資提供一個(gè)平臺(tái),而我國(guó)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資也是在最近幾年才得到迅速發(fā)展的,二者發(fā)展時(shí)間比較契合,創(chuàng)業(yè)板IPO就成為我國(guó)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資退出的重要渠道,每年在創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市的公司中有超過50%的公司都有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資的參與,因此,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資對(duì)我國(guó)創(chuàng)業(yè)板IPO的影響是一個(gè)非常值得研究的問題�；诖�,本文選取了2009年10月30號(hào)到2011年12月31號(hào)在創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市的261家公司為研究樣本。運(yùn)用了描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)、獨(dú)立樣本T檢驗(yàn)、配對(duì)樣本T檢驗(yàn)、非參數(shù)Mann-Whitney檢驗(yàn)、Wilcoxon檢驗(yàn)及橫截面模型等方法進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析。 實(shí)證結(jié)果表明,在公司IPO前有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資參與的公司業(yè)績(jī)不如沒有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資參與的公司好；公司IPO時(shí)有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資參與的公司未能比沒有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資參與的公司有更好的表現(xiàn)；在公司IPO前后經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)的對(duì)比中,不管有沒有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資的參與,在IPO后公司的經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)都會(huì)下滑,但是有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資參與的公司明顯比沒有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資參與的公司業(yè)績(jī)下滑的程度要��；公司IPO后,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資沒有能夠?qū)镜臉I(yè)績(jī)產(chǎn)生顯著性影響�？傮w來看,風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資在我國(guó)創(chuàng)業(yè)板市場(chǎng)上沒有能夠完全發(fā)揮出其“認(rèn)證/監(jiān)督”功能,對(duì)上市公司業(yè)績(jī)的影響不如成熟的證券市場(chǎng),這可能是由于我國(guó)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資起步較晚,發(fā)展還不夠完善,另外,我國(guó)也沒有專門支持風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資發(fā)展的法律法規(guī),使得風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資的發(fā)展缺乏法律的保護(hù)；與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資運(yùn)作相關(guān)的中介機(jī)構(gòu)的發(fā)展也不健全；具備專業(yè)知識(shí)的綜合型人才的缺失等。因此,需要建立健全與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資相關(guān)的法律法規(guī),大力支持中介機(jī)構(gòu)的發(fā)展,努力培養(yǎng)符合風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資發(fā)展要求的綜合型人才。
[Abstract]:At home and abroad in recent years on the impact of venture capital on IPO to give a high degree of attention, the market performance and its influence factors of the underpricing of IPO and IPO has been a hot issue for scholars at home and abroad. With the rapid development of international investment within the scope of the risk as well as its important exit channel IPO continues to improve in the risk investment in the process of IPO company to more and more attention. The impact of the global scope of risk investment to IPO can be divided into the positive impact of "certification / supervision model" hypothesis and the negative impact of the "adverse selection / grandstanding effect" hypothesis, market data, the conclusion of different institutional background the difference, because of the development of China's venture capital is relatively late, is not yet mature, for the impact of venture capital on China's company IPO needs further research. This paper will be based on the record The karma market is the research object to study the impact of venture capital on the performance of IPO before and after the company.
The gem in China started relatively late, it is a high-tech and high-tech small and medium-sized enterprises listing and financing to provide a platform, but the risk of investment in China is only in recent years has been rapid development, the development of the two time more fit, the gem IPO has become an important channel for venture capital exit in China, there are more than 50% companies have the participation of venture capital investment, a company listed on the gem in the year so that the impact of venture capital on China's gem IPO is a very worthy of study. Based on this, this paper selected from October 30, 2009 to December 31, 2011 in the 261 companies listed on GEM as research sample. Using descriptive statistics, independent samples T test, paired samples T test, nonparametric Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon test and cross section model for empirical analysis.
The empirical results show that, in the company before IPO risk investment in company performance as there is no risk investment in the company; IPO risk investment in the company failed to participate in risk investment companies than not have better performance; comparison of operating performance in the company before and after IPO, with or without the participation of venture capital investment. After IPO, the company's operating performance will decline, but there is a risk investment in the company than no risk investment in the performance of the company to the extent of the decline in the small company; IPO, venture capital can not have a significant impact on the company's performance. Overall, the risk of investment in China's GEM market is not able to fully play its "certification / supervision function, influence on the performance of listed companies as the mature stock market, this may be due to the risk of investment in China started late. The exhibition is still not perfect, in addition, China has no specific laws and regulations to support the development of venture capital investment, the development of venture capital investment is lack of legal protection; the development of intermediary agencies related to the operation of venture capital investment is not perfect; the comprehensive talents with professional knowledge lack. Therefore, we need to establish and improve the laws and regulations and risk the related investment, vigorously support the development of intermediary organizations, to cultivate comprehensive risk investment requirements for the development of talents.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F275;F276.6;F832.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱元甲;李陽;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資對(duì)創(chuàng)業(yè)板市場(chǎng)IPO抑價(jià)的影響[J];商業(yè)研究;2012年03期

2 李曜;張子煒;;私募股權(quán)、天使資本對(duì)創(chuàng)業(yè)板市場(chǎng)IPO抑價(jià)的不同影響[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2011年08期

3 李昌奕;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資增值服務(wù)研究評(píng)述[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2005年06期

4 張豐;;創(chuàng)業(yè)投資對(duì)中小企業(yè)板IPO影響的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2009年05期

5 陳工孟;俞欣;寇祥河;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資參與對(duì)中資企業(yè)首次公開發(fā)行折價(jià)的影響——不同證券市場(chǎng)的比較[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年05期

6 張學(xué)勇;廖理;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資背景與公司IPO:市場(chǎng)表現(xiàn)與內(nèi)在機(jī)理[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年06期

7 陳良華,孫健,張菡;香港創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司IPO前后業(yè)績(jī)變化及其影響因素的實(shí)證研究[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年04期

8 田明;;創(chuàng)業(yè)板市場(chǎng)對(duì)我國(guó)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資發(fā)展的影響研究[J];商業(yè)文化(學(xué)術(shù)版);2010年03期

9 寇祥河;潘嵐;丁春樂;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資在中小企業(yè)IPO中的功效研究[J];證券市場(chǎng)導(dǎo)報(bào);2009年05期

10 梁建敏;吳江;;創(chuàng)業(yè)板公司IPO前后業(yè)績(jī)變化及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資的影響[J];證券市場(chǎng)導(dǎo)報(bào);2012年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1357161