1933年中國國民所得再考察——淺析巫寶三與劉大中估算的差異
發(fā)布時間:2018-11-28 18:54
【摘要】:由著名經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家巫寶三和劉大中分別主持完成的民國時期中國國民所得估算,是中國國民收入核算工作的開端和近代經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究中的兩部名著,但二者對1933年中國國內(nèi)凈產(chǎn)值的估算存在著超過40%的差距,國內(nèi)外學(xué)術(shù)界在不斷引用這兩項研究成果的過程中卻沒有對這一差異予以足夠的重視和研究。本文嘗試從研究方法、估算科目和統(tǒng)計資料等方面入手,對這兩項研究進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的比較和分析,在闡述其主要征引數(shù)據(jù)和修正方法的同時,強(qiáng)調(diào)了將總量數(shù)據(jù)分解到地區(qū)和行業(yè)再進(jìn)行修正這一研究思路的重要性。
[Abstract]:The estimation of the income of Chinese nationals in the period of the Republic of China, presided over by famous economists Wu Baosan and Liu Dazhong respectively, is the beginning of the work of national income accounting in China and two famous books in the study of modern economic history. However, there is a difference of more than 40% between them in the estimation of China's domestic net output value in 1933, and the academic circles at home and abroad have not paid enough attention to and studied the difference in the process of citation of these two research results. This paper attempts to compare and analyze the two studies in detail from the aspects of research methods, estimation subjects and statistical data, while expounding the main cited data and correction methods. The importance of decomposing the total data into regions and industries is emphasized.
【作者單位】: 南開大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】:國家社會科學(xué)基金重點項目“從經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的視角看西方的崛起和中西大分流研究”(15AJL009) 中國特色社會主義經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心項目“近代中國馬克思主義政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)傳播與國際學(xué)術(shù)環(huán)境研究”
【分類號】:F129
本文編號:2363953
[Abstract]:The estimation of the income of Chinese nationals in the period of the Republic of China, presided over by famous economists Wu Baosan and Liu Dazhong respectively, is the beginning of the work of national income accounting in China and two famous books in the study of modern economic history. However, there is a difference of more than 40% between them in the estimation of China's domestic net output value in 1933, and the academic circles at home and abroad have not paid enough attention to and studied the difference in the process of citation of these two research results. This paper attempts to compare and analyze the two studies in detail from the aspects of research methods, estimation subjects and statistical data, while expounding the main cited data and correction methods. The importance of decomposing the total data into regions and industries is emphasized.
【作者單位】: 南開大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】:國家社會科學(xué)基金重點項目“從經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的視角看西方的崛起和中西大分流研究”(15AJL009) 中國特色社會主義經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心項目“近代中國馬克思主義政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)傳播與國際學(xué)術(shù)環(huán)境研究”
【分類號】:F129
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 學(xué)書;;《中國社會科學(xué)院經(jīng)濟(jì)研究所集刊》已經(jīng)出版發(fā)行[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1980年01期
,本文編號:2363953
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2363953.html
最近更新
教材專著