京津冀科技創(chuàng)新協(xié)同水平評(píng)價(jià)研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-13 13:41
【摘要】：自2014年京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展上升為國家戰(zhàn)略以來,各地政府高度重視三地的合作,在京津冀一體化背景下,研究如何做到京津冀區(qū)域內(nèi)資源相互補(bǔ)充,實(shí)現(xiàn)京津冀區(qū)域科技創(chuàng)新協(xié)同發(fā)展,建立北京、天津、河北三地政府支持,以企業(yè)尤其是高新技術(shù)企業(yè)為主體、依托三地高校和機(jī)構(gòu)創(chuàng)新資源的區(qū)域科技協(xié)同創(chuàng)新體系具有重要的意義和價(jià)值。本文通過比較單指標(biāo)分析三地的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平存在著的差異和不平衡性,尤其是河北省與北京、天津兩地之間。進(jìn)一步地,通過科技創(chuàng)新單指標(biāo)對(duì)比京津冀三地2006-2015年間研究與試驗(yàn)發(fā)展(RD)經(jīng)費(fèi)支出或是在研究與試驗(yàn)發(fā)展經(jīng)費(fèi)投入強(qiáng)度上,不同地區(qū)間經(jīng)費(fèi)支出的差異。論文通過構(gòu)建區(qū)域科技創(chuàng)新指標(biāo)體系,運(yùn)用層次分析法確定各級(jí)指標(biāo)的具體權(quán)重,結(jié)合2010年京津冀三地科技創(chuàng)新具體的指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù),通過綜合創(chuàng)新能力的對(duì)比分析三地在創(chuàng)新環(huán)境、創(chuàng)新投入、創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出以及創(chuàng)新成效方面的不平衡性和差距�？傮w來講,通過構(gòu)建的指標(biāo)體系我們分析京津冀地區(qū)科技創(chuàng)新綜合能力,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)河北與北京、天津存在著一定的差距。京津冀創(chuàng)新能力水平的差距主要在創(chuàng)新投入、創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)出、創(chuàng)新成效方面,創(chuàng)新環(huán)境影響相對(duì)較小。創(chuàng)新投入是影響京津冀創(chuàng)新能力水平差異的主要方面。采用灰色關(guān)聯(lián)度分析法,以北京市為參考序列,通過分析2006-2015年天津、河北與北京科技創(chuàng)新關(guān)聯(lián)度來看三地的協(xié)同度,通過比較我們發(fā)現(xiàn)天津、河北與北京科技創(chuàng)新協(xié)同度相對(duì)較高,并且天津與北京的協(xié)同度要略高于河北與北京的協(xié)同度。河北與北京科技創(chuàng)新協(xié)同度較低的方面是普通高校數(shù)、RD人員全時(shí)當(dāng)量、RD經(jīng)費(fèi)占地區(qū)生產(chǎn)總值的比重。主要還是創(chuàng)新環(huán)境和創(chuàng)新投入方面。最后,通過收集到的2014年、2015年北京、天津、河北三地之間在科技創(chuàng)新方面共同合作的一些情況來看三地之間的協(xié)同度,京津冀區(qū)域從2014年科技創(chuàng)新戰(zhàn)略實(shí)施以來在科技創(chuàng)新合作上有很大的進(jìn)步。針對(duì)京津冀區(qū)域科技創(chuàng)新發(fā)展的差異以及存在的問題,文章最后提出相應(yīng)的建議。
[Abstract]:Since the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei has become a national strategy in 2014, local governments have attached great importance to the cooperation among the three places. In the context of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei integration, they have studied how to complement each other's resources in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. To realize the coordinated development of scientific and technological innovation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, to establish the government support of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, with enterprises, especially high-tech enterprises, as the main body, It is of great significance and value for the regional sci-tech collaborative innovation system to rely on the innovative resources of universities and institutions in the three places. This paper analyzes the differences and unbalance in the economic development of the three places by comparing the single index, especially between Hebei Province and Beijing and Tianjin. Furthermore, the differences of (RD) expenditure between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei between 2006 and 2015, or the intensity of research and experimental development expenditure, are compared by single index of science and technology innovation. By constructing the index system of regional scientific and technological innovation, using AHP to determine the specific weights of the indexes at all levels, combined with the specific index data of scientific and technological innovation in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei in 2010, Through the comparative analysis of the comprehensive innovation ability, this paper analyzes the imbalance and gap between the three places in innovation environment, innovation input, innovation output and innovation effect. In general, by analyzing the comprehensive ability of scientific and technological innovation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, we can find that there is a certain gap between Hebei and Beijing and Tianjin. The difference of innovation ability level between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei is mainly in innovation input, innovation output and innovation effect, and the impact of innovation environment is relatively small. Innovation investment is the main aspect that affects the level of innovation ability of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. By using grey relational degree analysis method, taking Beijing as reference sequence and analyzing the correlation degree of science and technology innovation between Hebei and Beijing from 2006 to 2015, we find that Tianjin is a city where the degree of synergy among the three places is compared. The synergetic degree of science and technology innovation between Hebei and Beijing is relatively high, and the synergy between Tianjin and Beijing is slightly higher than that between Hebei and Beijing. The low degree of synergy between Hebei and Beijing in science and technology innovation is the number of ordinary colleges and universities, the full-time equivalent of RD personnel, and the proportion of RD funds to the regional GDP. The main innovation environment and innovation input. Finally, through the collection of 2014, 2015, Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei cooperation in science and technology innovation, we can see the degree of synergy among the three places. Since the implementation of science and technology innovation strategy in 2014, Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei regions have made great progress in scientific and technological innovation cooperation. In view of the differences and problems in the development of science and technology innovation in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, the paper finally puts forward some corresponding suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F124.3
本文編號(hào)：2268852
[Abstract]:Since the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei has become a national strategy in 2014, local governments have attached great importance to the cooperation among the three places. In the context of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei integration, they have studied how to complement each other's resources in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. To realize the coordinated development of scientific and technological innovation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, to establish the government support of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, with enterprises, especially high-tech enterprises, as the main body, It is of great significance and value for the regional sci-tech collaborative innovation system to rely on the innovative resources of universities and institutions in the three places. This paper analyzes the differences and unbalance in the economic development of the three places by comparing the single index, especially between Hebei Province and Beijing and Tianjin. Furthermore, the differences of (RD) expenditure between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei between 2006 and 2015, or the intensity of research and experimental development expenditure, are compared by single index of science and technology innovation. By constructing the index system of regional scientific and technological innovation, using AHP to determine the specific weights of the indexes at all levels, combined with the specific index data of scientific and technological innovation in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei in 2010, Through the comparative analysis of the comprehensive innovation ability, this paper analyzes the imbalance and gap between the three places in innovation environment, innovation input, innovation output and innovation effect. In general, by analyzing the comprehensive ability of scientific and technological innovation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, we can find that there is a certain gap between Hebei and Beijing and Tianjin. The difference of innovation ability level between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei is mainly in innovation input, innovation output and innovation effect, and the impact of innovation environment is relatively small. Innovation investment is the main aspect that affects the level of innovation ability of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. By using grey relational degree analysis method, taking Beijing as reference sequence and analyzing the correlation degree of science and technology innovation between Hebei and Beijing from 2006 to 2015, we find that Tianjin is a city where the degree of synergy among the three places is compared. The synergetic degree of science and technology innovation between Hebei and Beijing is relatively high, and the synergy between Tianjin and Beijing is slightly higher than that between Hebei and Beijing. The low degree of synergy between Hebei and Beijing in science and technology innovation is the number of ordinary colleges and universities, the full-time equivalent of RD personnel, and the proportion of RD funds to the regional GDP. The main innovation environment and innovation input. Finally, through the collection of 2014, 2015, Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei cooperation in science and technology innovation, we can see the degree of synergy among the three places. Since the implementation of science and technology innovation strategy in 2014, Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei regions have made great progress in scientific and technological innovation cooperation. In view of the differences and problems in the development of science and technology innovation in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, the paper finally puts forward some corresponding suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F124.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 姜文仙;;廣東省區(qū)域科技創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];科技管理研究;2016年08期
2 李玲;封峰;;陜西省產(chǎn)學(xué)研科技創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)協(xié)同發(fā)展實(shí)證研究[J];技術(shù)與創(chuàng)新管理;2016年02期
3 汪曉夢(mèng);汪琛;;合蕪蚌自主創(chuàng)新試驗(yàn)區(qū)科技創(chuàng)新績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究——基于灰色關(guān)聯(lián)和主成分視角[J];嘉興學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期
4 李京文;李劍玲;;京津冀協(xié)同創(chuàng)新發(fā)展比較研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2015年02期
5 許愛萍;;京津冀科技創(chuàng)新協(xié)同發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2014年10期
6 吳松強(qiáng);陶嫻婷;;國外建設(shè)科技創(chuàng)新協(xié)同綜合體的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與借鑒[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2014年50期
7 張?jiān)?竇麗琛;高鐘庭;;“京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展:機(jī)遇與路徑學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)”綜述[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2014年02期
8 吳玫;;京津冀一體化背景下的產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作機(jī)制研究[J];河北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期
9 何恬;劉娟;;京津冀區(qū)域協(xié)同創(chuàng)新體系建設(shè)研究[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2013年20期
10 白雪飛;張陽;;遼寧區(qū)域科技創(chuàng)新體系創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2012年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張靜;我國農(nóng)業(yè)科技創(chuàng)新能力與效率研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號(hào)：2268852
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2268852.html
最近更新
教材專著
