我國金融業(yè)與實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)非協(xié)同發(fā)展關(guān)系研究
[Abstract]:In recent years, the trend of non-synergistic development of financial industry and real economy in China has aroused widespread concern from all walks of life, and the relationship between the two has gradually become a hot topic in the social and academic circles. In this paper, quantitative, qualitative and empirical analysis methods are used to study the relationship between financial industry and real economy in China. On the basis of combing the previous research results, this paper sums up the relevant development mechanism of financial industry and real economy, and explains their respective development situation and deviation relationship in recent years. Through cointegration test, Granger causality test, impulse response function and variance decomposition analysis, the relationship between the financial industry and the real economy as a whole is deeply analyzed. At the same time, using the panel data of 30 provinces and cities, the paper empirically analyzes the effect of financial industry on the development of real economy. The conclusion shows that there is a stable co-integration relationship and one-way Granger causality between the financial industry and the real economy. The real economy is the Granger cause of the financial industry, and the financial industry is not the Granger cause of the real economy. The response of real economic data to financial data innovation is a negative effect, and the response of financial data to real economic data innovation is positive, and the fluctuation of real economic data is mostly explained by itself. About 40% of the fluctuations in the financial sector data can be explained by the real economy; the real economy promotes the development of the financial industry powerfully, and the financial sector does not obviously promote the development of the real economy; compared with other macroeconomic factors, The impact of banking and securities on the real economy is not significant and has no obvious promoting effect. Finally, based on the analysis of the non-coordinated development between the financial industry and the real economy in China, this paper puts forward some relevant policy recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F832;F124
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李曉西,楊琳;虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)、泡沫經(jīng)濟(jì)與實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年06期
2 陸靜;唐小我;;金融發(fā)展推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的理論模式及實(shí)證分析[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期
3 李廣眾,陳平;金融中介發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長:多變量VAR系統(tǒng)研究[J];管理世界;2002年03期
4 王志強(qiáng),孫剛;中國金融發(fā)展規(guī)模、結(jié)構(gòu)、效率與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長關(guān)系的經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析[J];管理世界;2003年07期
5 沈坤榮,張成;金融發(fā)展與中國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長——基于跨地區(qū)動(dòng)態(tài)數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證研究[J];管理世界;2004年07期
6 伍超明;虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)與實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系模型——對(duì)經(jīng)常性背離關(guān)系的論證[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年12期
7 高輝;;金融中介、股票市場(chǎng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長:基于聯(lián)立方程模型的實(shí)證分析[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年02期
8 韓廷春;金融發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長:基于中國的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2001年03期
9 馬穎;陳波;;改革開放以來中國經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革、金融發(fā)展與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2009年01期
10 劉駿民;段彥飛;;全球流動(dòng)性膨脹的歷史和邏輯[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2008年06期
本文編號(hào):2249194
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2249194.html