中國居民資產(chǎn)不平等研究
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of the 21st century, science and technology have progressed with each passing day, the world economy has developed rapidly, especially in the context of economic globalization. At the same time, inequality (income, assets, wealth, welfare, etc.) in many countries in the world has intensified. However, as the largest developing country in the world, the gap between the rich and the poor is becoming more and more serious, and inequality is becoming more and more serious. Because individuals are concerned about the current level of assets and future expected income when they consume and save, that is to say, the stock of assets rather than current income determines the consumption and savings of individuals; secondly, the distribution of assets to a large extent affects the consumption structure and savings structure of the people, thereby affecting the normal operation of the macro-economy. In addition, due to economic foundation, geographical factors and other reasons, the level of inequality in residential assets is becoming more and more serious. This paper first introduces the mainstream methods and modern methods of measuring inequality, which include Gini coefficient and Lorentz curve, Theil index, coefficient of variation and coefficient of distortion. Modern methods include the Bonferroni index and the De Vergottini index. On this basis, the advantages and disadvantages of each index and its application are analyzed, and the B index, V index and G index are compared. The results show that: first, the Gini index is best used when unequal decomposition is needed according to income sources. Second, when unequal groups are needed. Thirdly, the focus of index B is on the low-income group, the focus of index V is on the high-income group, and the focus of index G is on the middle-income group. Then, the B index satisfies the PPTS principle while the V index and G index do not. Firstly, this paper uses the B index, V index and G index to measure the inequality of Chinese residents'assets as a whole, and then uses Gini coefficient and Bonferroni index to decompose the inequality of Chinese residents' assets and finds luxury goods. The inequality of non-financial assets and financial assets is the highest. In the process of decomposing the urban and rural residents'assets, both the Theil index method and Bonferroni index method find that the gap between urban and rural areas has little effect on the total inequality. Rroni index method found that the urban residents'asset inequality is higher than that of rural residents, which is closely related to the sensitivity of different indicators to different income groups and government welfare policies. Theil index is very sensitive to the income changes of high-income groups, and Bonferroni index is very sensitive to the income changes of low-income groups. In the process of regional decomposition, both Theil index and Bonferroni index decomposition are used to find that regional inequality has little effect on the total inequality. The inequality of residents'assets in the eastern region is the highest, followed by the western region and the central region is the lowest. Methods. Secondly, different measures were taken to reduce the urban and rural inequality. Thirdly, different measures were taken to narrow the internal asset gap among the eastern, central and western regions according to the different characteristics of the region.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:F124.7
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 戴平生;;基尼系數(shù)的區(qū)間估計及其應(yīng)用[J];統(tǒng)計研究;2013年05期
2 楊國濤;黑亞青;周慧潔;葛志軍;;收入不平等的度量指標(biāo)及其應(yīng)用[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2013年03期
3 張屹山;陳默;;泰爾(Theil)指數(shù)及其在中國的適用性檢驗——兼論收入分配與擴大內(nèi)需[J];經(jīng)濟與管理研究;2012年12期
4 王紅濤;;中國城鄉(xiāng)收入差距分析——基于泰爾指數(shù)的分解[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2009年12期
5 萬廣華;;不平等的度量與分解[J];經(jīng)濟學(xué)(季刊);2009年01期
6 苑林婭;;中國收入差距不平等狀況的泰爾指數(shù)分析[J];云南財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年01期
7 夏華;;泰爾指數(shù)及其在我國行業(yè)收入差距中的應(yīng)用[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2007年07期
8 趙長林;李興緒;;基尼系數(shù)和泰爾熵指標(biāo)的分解分析比較——以云南省17個少數(shù)民族地區(qū)的收入差距為例[J];西華大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期
9 趙偉;馬瑞永;;中國區(qū)域金融增長的差異——基于泰爾指數(shù)的測度[J];經(jīng)濟地理;2006年01期
10 洪興建,李金昌;如何正確測算我國居民收入基尼系數(shù)[J];南開經(jīng)濟研究;2005年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 彭妮婭;居民收入差距的測度、影響因素及經(jīng)濟效應(yīng)研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2013年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 李夏;中國居民資產(chǎn)不均等分布的測度及其影響因素研究[D];廣東商學(xué)院;2013年
,本文編號:2208041
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/shijiejingjilunwen/2208041.html