【摘要】：改革開放以來,中國在經(jīng)濟(jì)總量增長上取得了舉世矚目的成就,經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)也隨之發(fā)生巨大變化。產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)作為經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)中的一個(gè)重要方面,對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的變化具有較大的影響,研究中國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中的問題,必須包含產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的視角。 我國由于歷史發(fā)展、資源稟賦及政策失衡等多方面原因,不同地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)存在著巨大的差異,與此同時(shí),不同地區(qū)之間的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長速度以及經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平也相差懸殊。尤其在改革開放以后,產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)始終處在動(dòng)態(tài)的變革之中,經(jīng)濟(jì)增速的變化往往與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)存在較強(qiáng)的相關(guān)性。 本文將產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)分割為產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)高級(jí)化和產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)合理化兩個(gè)方面,研究我國不同區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長之間的關(guān)系。本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)在于優(yōu)化了衡量產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的方法,以及在研究中加入了區(qū)域分析與比較。研究表明,我國的產(chǎn)業(yè)高級(jí)化對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)增長起到了明顯的促進(jìn)作用,而產(chǎn)業(yè)合理化對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的貢獻(xiàn)并不大。從區(qū)域來看,東部的產(chǎn)業(yè)高級(jí)化和產(chǎn)業(yè)合理化對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)增長都起到了正向的促進(jìn)作用；中部的產(chǎn)業(yè)高級(jí)化阻礙了其經(jīng)濟(jì)增長,而產(chǎn)業(yè)合理化對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長影響較�。晃鞑康貐^(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)高級(jí)化促進(jìn)了當(dāng)?shù)氐慕?jīng)濟(jì)增長,但產(chǎn)業(yè)合理化進(jìn)程對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長卻起到了反向的阻礙效果。 本文共分為五個(gè)部分。第一部分是全文的導(dǎo)論,介紹本文的選題背景、研究思路以及研究方法。第二部分是理論研究綜述,主要分為產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長關(guān)系的理論概述,以及中國產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長關(guān)系研究的文獻(xiàn)綜述。第三部分主要研究我國產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的現(xiàn)狀,首先對(duì)新中國建國后產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的演變歷史進(jìn)行了回顧與總結(jié),然后分別從產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)高級(jí)化與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)合理化兩個(gè)方面對(duì)我國的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了測度與評(píng)價(jià),并探究現(xiàn)狀的內(nèi)在原因。第四部分是對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長關(guān)系的回歸分析,利用改革開放后各省區(qū)的面板數(shù)據(jù)對(duì)全國以及東中西三個(gè)區(qū)域的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行研究。第五部分對(duì)于如何進(jìn)行產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)并從而促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長給出相應(yīng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China has made remarkable achievements in gross economic growth, and the economic structure has also undergone tremendous changes. As an important aspect of economic structure, industrial structure has great influence on the change of economic growth. To study the problems in China's economic development, we must include the perspective of industrial structure. Due to the historical development, resource endowment and policy imbalance, there are great differences in the industrial structure of different regions. At the same time, the speed of economic growth and the level of economic development between different regions are also very different. Especially after the reform and opening up, the industrial structure is always in the dynamic change, the change of the economic growth rate often has strong correlation with the industrial structure. In this paper, the industrial structure is divided into two aspects: the upgrading of industrial structure and the rationalization of industrial structure, and the relationship between industrial structure and economic growth in different regions of China is studied. The innovation of this paper is to optimize the method of measuring industrial structure, and to add regional analysis and comparison to the research. The research shows that the industrial upgrading plays a significant role in promoting economic growth, but the contribution of industrial rationalization to economic growth is not great. From the regional point of view, the industrial upgrading and industrial rationalization in the east have played a positive role in promoting economic growth, while in the middle, industrial upgrading has hindered its economic growth, while industrial rationalization has little impact on economic growth. The industrial upgrading in the western region promotes the local economic growth, but the process of industrial rationalization hinders the economic growth in the opposite direction. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction of the full text, introducing the background, research ideas and research methods of this paper. The second part is a review of theoretical research, mainly divided into the theoretical overview of the relationship between industrial structure and economic growth, as well as the literature review of the relationship between industrial structure and economic growth in China. The third part mainly studies the present situation of the industrial structure of our country. Firstly, it reviews and summarizes the evolution history of the industrial structure after the founding of the people's Republic of China. Then, the paper measures and evaluates the industrial structure of our country from the aspects of industrial structure upgrading and industrial structure rationalization, and probes into the internal reasons of the present situation. The fourth part is the regression analysis of the relationship between industrial structure and economic growth, using the panel data of the provinces and regions after the reform and opening to the outside world to study the current situation of the three regions of China, East and West. The fifth part gives some policy suggestions on how to upgrade industry and promote economic growth.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F121.3;F124.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 江小涓;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化升級(jí):新階段和新任務(wù)[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年04期

2 毛健;經(jīng)濟(jì)增長中的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年02期

3 劉偉,李紹榮;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年05期

4 胡立君,石軍偉,傅太平;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)組織互動(dòng)關(guān)系的實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)理研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年05期

5 干春暉;鄭若谷;;改革開放以來產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演進(jìn)與生產(chǎn)率增長研究——對(duì)中國1978～2007年“結(jié)構(gòu)紅利假說”的檢驗(yàn)[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年02期

6 鄭若谷;干春暉;余典范;;轉(zhuǎn)型期中國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和制度效應(yīng)——基于一個(gè)隨機(jī)前沿模型的研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年02期

7 呂鐵;制造業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變化對(duì)生產(chǎn)率增長的影響研究[J];管理世界;2002年02期

8 陳彥斌;;中國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長與經(jīng)濟(jì)穩(wěn)定:何者更為重要[J];管理世界;2005年07期

9 譚順福;;中國產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的現(xiàn)狀及其調(diào)整[J];管理世界;2007年06期

10 袁欣;;中國對(duì)外貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu):“鏡像”與“原像”的背離[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2010年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2125409