本文選題：區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展 + 產(chǎn)業(yè)政策��； 參考：《武漢大學(xué)》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：按照世界銀行對(duì)國(guó)際貨幣基金組織(IMF)購(gòu)買力平價(jià)估算結(jié)果的分類,中國(guó)已躋身世界中等收入國(guó)家的行列,但是全國(guó)各地區(qū)差距依然巨大,這對(duì)于中國(guó)未來向更高階段的轉(zhuǎn)型十分不利。為應(yīng)對(duì)這一困局,21世紀(jì)以來,中央政府提出了一系列的縮小地區(qū)差距,實(shí)現(xiàn)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略方針,由21世紀(jì)初期的四大區(qū)域發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的一般性框架,到主體功能區(qū)戰(zhàn)略的差別化布局,再到現(xiàn)今基于“四化協(xié)同”推進(jìn)的新型城鎮(zhèn)化發(fā)展思路。最近,李克強(qiáng)總理在十二屆全國(guó)人大二次會(huì)議上作政府工作報(bào)告又提出了新的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展格局,即強(qiáng)調(diào)把培育新的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)帶作為推動(dòng)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略支撐,打造“兩橫三縱”五條經(jīng)濟(jì)帶,預(yù)示著由“塊狀經(jīng)濟(jì)”時(shí)代向“帶狀經(jīng)濟(jì)”時(shí)代的轉(zhuǎn)變。 產(chǎn)業(yè)和城市是區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的進(jìn)一步細(xì)分,關(guān)于從城市視角解讀區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距的研究,隨著黨的十八大提出新型城鎮(zhèn)化發(fā)展思路后,被學(xué)術(shù)界所重點(diǎn)關(guān)注,而基于產(chǎn)業(yè)視角的相關(guān)研究往往伴隨著轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式,深化市場(chǎng)化改革,推進(jìn)區(qū)域一體化水平等以促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)為目的地國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略的提出,而更多的關(guān)注經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),至此如何從產(chǎn)業(yè)視角來解讀區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差距的問題,至今還沒有一個(gè)較為完善的研究。為此,本文從產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、產(chǎn)業(yè)布局、產(chǎn)業(yè)政策等多維視角來闡述中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距變化規(guī)律的內(nèi)在機(jī)制,分別構(gòu)建市場(chǎng)主導(dǎo)和政府主導(dǎo)的理論框架,前者強(qiáng)調(diào)在市場(chǎng)主導(dǎo)背景下,比較優(yōu)勢(shì)(區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)差異程度)和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)(產(chǎn)業(yè)空間活動(dòng)特征)發(fā)揮所引起的區(qū)域差距,后者強(qiáng)調(diào)政府發(fā)展思維的變遷,所引起的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和產(chǎn)業(yè)布局變化,進(jìn)而引起的區(qū)域差距,通過兩類視角的分析,旨在制定促進(jìn)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策框架提供可供參考的建議措施。 除導(dǎo)論外,論文共分為六章。 第二章理清本文關(guān)注的相關(guān)基本概念和產(chǎn)業(yè)政策制定的理論依據(jù)。包括在準(zhǔn)確界定產(chǎn)業(yè)-行業(yè)-企業(yè)-產(chǎn)品的空間邏輯基礎(chǔ)之上,重新認(rèn)識(shí)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化、產(chǎn)業(yè)組織合理化和產(chǎn)業(yè)布局合理化的內(nèi)涵,以及從產(chǎn)業(yè)價(jià)值鏈視角,分析三者之間的關(guān)聯(lián)性。追溯以往產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、產(chǎn)業(yè)組織和產(chǎn)業(yè)布局政策制定的理論依據(jù),搭建促進(jìn)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策框架,包括政策目標(biāo),實(shí)施和制定主體,以及政策體系,理清產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、組織和布局政策的聯(lián)系。 第三章是基于產(chǎn)業(yè)視角重點(diǎn)考察中國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距變化的特征事實(shí)。運(yùn)用數(shù)學(xué)推導(dǎo)證明,不同測(cè)度視角下的產(chǎn)業(yè)布局格局、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)差異和地區(qū)差距的關(guān)聯(lián)性。以分省區(qū)的大類部門-一位數(shù)部門-二位數(shù)部門為樣本,改進(jìn)指標(biāo)量化分解方法,構(gòu)建時(shí)間序列和動(dòng)態(tài)面板模型,借鑒邊緣-核心格局識(shí)別方法,對(duì)決定區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距的兩大內(nèi)生變量：產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)差距(產(chǎn)業(yè)空間活動(dòng))和產(chǎn)業(yè)間差距(區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變遷差異)的變化規(guī)律進(jìn)行考察。 第四章為構(gòu)建一個(gè)解釋區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距的空間經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)數(shù)理模型。從產(chǎn)業(yè)價(jià)值鏈視角,提出一個(gè)包容比較優(yōu)勢(shì)和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)理論的融合性框架,借鑒空間經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)建模分析方法,搭建一個(gè)兩區(qū)域-兩部門-三行業(yè)模型,通過分析發(fā)現(xiàn)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化程度對(duì)區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)差異、產(chǎn)業(yè)空間活動(dòng)和地區(qū)差距的影響,取決于要素稟賦結(jié)構(gòu)及初始條件。并進(jìn)一步討論不同空間尺度下的一體化對(duì)地區(qū)差距的影響,認(rèn)為區(qū)域內(nèi)外部經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化有利于區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的全面實(shí)現(xiàn)。 第五章從中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)政策實(shí)踐的視角分析區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距的內(nèi)在機(jī)制�；仡櫜煌瑓^(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略時(shí)期下的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策實(shí)踐,并對(duì)其特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),搭建經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略-產(chǎn)業(yè)政策-地區(qū)差距的基本分析框架,在由比較優(yōu)勢(shì)戰(zhàn)略、后發(fā)優(yōu)勢(shì)戰(zhàn)略、不同視角下的比較優(yōu)勢(shì)和后發(fā)優(yōu)勢(shì)融合戰(zhàn)略,以及競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)戰(zhàn)略和區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略組成的戰(zhàn)略池,政策制定者和實(shí)施者利益沖突,產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的強(qiáng)制性和引導(dǎo)性等三大因素框架下分析區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距的內(nèi)在機(jī)制。 第六章基于計(jì)量模型實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)決定區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距產(chǎn)業(yè)分解項(xiàng)的主要因素。從制造業(yè)視角出發(fā),實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)差異和產(chǎn)業(yè)空間活動(dòng)的決定性因素,以間接回答區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距形成的原因。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)：在產(chǎn)業(yè)聚集方面,除以往的經(jīng)濟(jì)地理因素如地理位置,新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理因素如規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)、市場(chǎng)潛力和運(yùn)輸成本等,新古典因素如要素稟賦等外,產(chǎn)業(yè)政策實(shí)施強(qiáng)度也決定著產(chǎn)業(yè)聚集程度。在區(qū)域產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)差異方面,發(fā)現(xiàn)地區(qū)間的工資水平差異和歷史因素是決定結(jié)構(gòu)趨異的兩大主導(dǎo)因素,而改革開放對(duì)其影響作用較小 第七章在總結(jié)前文的理論與實(shí)證分析的基礎(chǔ)上,提出促進(jìn)相關(guān)的政策建議,包括建立中央和地方政府的利益協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,產(chǎn)業(yè)政策體系內(nèi)部的協(xié)調(diào)一致,實(shí)現(xiàn)產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的轉(zhuǎn)型,推進(jìn)政策實(shí)施手段的規(guī)范化和多樣化。最后提出未來進(jìn)一步的研究方向。
[Abstract]:According to the classification of the world bank's estimate of the purchasing power parity of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), China has become one of the ranks of the world's middle income countries, but the gap in the whole country is still huge, which is very bad for the future transition of China to a higher stage. In order to cope with this dilemma, the central government has put forward a system since twenty-first Century. In order to narrow the regional gap and realize the strategic policy of coordinated development, the general framework of the four major regional development strategies in the early twenty-first Century, the difference layout of the main function area strategy, and the new urbanization development ideas based on the "four modernizations". Recently, Premier Li Keqiang at the two session of the twelve National People's Congress. The government work report also puts forward a new pattern of regional economic development, that is, to emphasize the cultivation of the new regional economic belt as a strategic support for promoting development and to build the "two horizontal three longitudinal" five economic belts, indicating the transition from the "block economy" era to the "band economy" era.
Industry and city are further subdivision of regional economic development. The study of the gap of regional economic development from the perspective of the city is focused on with the eighteen main ideas of the new urbanization development, and the related research based on the industrial perspective is often accompanied by the transformation of the economic development mode and deepening the market reform. In order to promote the regional integration level and so on to promote the sustained economic growth for the national strategy, and more attention to the economic growth, so far, how to interpret the regional economic gap from the industrial perspective has not yet been a more perfect study. Therefore, this paper from the industrial structure, industrial layout, industrial policy and other multi-dimensional perspective. This paper expounds the internal mechanism of the changing law of regional economic development gap in China, and constructs the theoretical framework of market leading and government led. The former emphasizes the regional gap caused by the comparative advantage (regional industrial structure difference) and competitive advantage (the characteristics of industrial space activity) under the market leading background, and the latter emphasizes the development of the government. The changes in thinking, the changes in the industrial structure and industrial layout, and the regional gap caused by the two kinds of perspectives are used to formulate the industrial policy framework to promote the coordinated development of regional economy and provide some suggestions for reference.
In addition to the introduction, the paper is divided into six chapters.
The second chapter clarifies the basic concepts of this article and the theoretical basis for the formulation of industrial policies, including the definition of industrial structure optimization, the rationalization of industrial organization and the rationalization of industrial layout, and the analysis of the three parties from the perspective of industrial value chain, on the basis of the spatial logic of industry industry, enterprise and product. Relevance. Tracing the theoretical basis of the previous industrial structure, industrial organization and industrial layout policy, building an industrial policy framework to promote the coordinated development of regional economy, including policy objectives, implementation and formulation of the main body, and policy system, to clarify the links between industrial structure, organization and distribution policy.
The third chapter is based on the industrial perspective to focus on the characteristics of the regional economic development gap changes in China. By using mathematical deduction, it is proved that the industrial layout pattern, the industrial structure difference and the regional gap are related to the different measurement perspectives. The quantitative score of the index is improved by the sample of the big departments in the province, the single digit sector and the two digit sector. The method of solution, construction of time series and dynamic panel model, and using the method of edge core pattern recognition to determine the two endogenous variables of regional economic development gap: intra industry gap (industrial space activity) and inter industry gap (the difference of regional industrial structure change).
The fourth chapter is to build a spatial economics mathematical model to explain the regional economic development gap. From the perspective of industrial value chain, a fusion framework of inclusive comparative advantage and competitive advantage theory is put forward, and the Spatial Economics Modeling and analysis method is used for reference to build a two Region - two door - three industry model, and the regional economy is found through the analysis. The impact of integration on regional industrial structure differences, industrial space activities and regional gaps depends on the factor endowment structure and initial conditions. The influence of integration on regional disparity in different spatial scales is further discussed. It is considered that the economic integration of the regional and external economies is beneficial to the comprehensive realization of the coordinated development of regional economy.
The fifth chapter analyzes the internal mechanism of the regional economic development gap from the perspective of China's industrial policy practice. It reviews the industrial policy practice in the period of different regional economic development strategy, evaluates its characteristics, builds the basic analysis framework of the economic development strategy, industrial policy and regional gap, and sends the advantage war after the comparative advantage strategy. The internal mechanism of the regional economic development gap is analyzed under the three major factors, such as the comparative advantage and the strategy of the post advantage integration under different perspectives, the strategic pool of competitive advantage strategy and the strategy of regional economic development, the conflict of interests of the policymakers and implementers, the mandatory and guiding of industrial policy.
The sixth chapter is based on the empirical test of measurement model to determine the main factors of industrial disparities in regional economic development. From the perspective of manufacturing industry, the paper empirically tests the differences of industrial structure and the decisive factors of industrial space activities, in order to indirectly answer the reasons for the formation of regional economic development gap. The economic geographical factors such as geographical location, new economic and geographical factors such as scale economy, market potential and transportation cost, and other new classical factors such as factor endowment, and the intensity of industrial policy implementation determine the degree of industrial aggregation. In the area of regional industrial structure differences, the difference in wage level and historical factors in the discovery area are determined by the difference in the wage level and the historical factors. The two leading factors are structural differences, while reform and opening up have little influence on them.
The seventh chapter, on the basis of the theoretical and empirical analysis of the previous article, proposes to promote relevant policy proposals, including the establishment of the coordination mechanism of the interests of the central and local governments, the harmonization of the internal industrial policy system, the transformation of industrial policies, the standardization and diversification of the means of policy implementation. Finally, the future is further proposed. Research direction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F127
，

本文編號(hào)：2073494