本文選題：經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效率 + 收入分配公平��； 參考：《經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家》2017年01期

【摘要】：本文把理想狀態(tài)的制度概括為制度公平,制度公平不僅能實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)效率,而且能實(shí)現(xiàn)收入分配公平,所以效率與公平統(tǒng)一于制度公平。運(yùn)用德國(guó)Bertelsmann基金編制的社會(huì)公平指數(shù),該結(jié)論得到了OECD和EU國(guó)家的實(shí)踐支持,社會(huì)公平指數(shù)越高的國(guó)家,不僅有更高的人均GDP水平,而且有更小的收入差距。所以,進(jìn)行制度公平建設(shè),推進(jìn)社會(huì)公平正義,既促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),又縮小收入差距,實(shí)現(xiàn)效率和公平雙目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the ideal state of institution is summed up as institutional fairness, which can not only realize the efficiency of economic growth, but also realize the fairness of income distribution, so efficiency and fairness are unified in institutional fairness. Using the social equity index compiled by Bertelsmann fund in Germany, this conclusion is supported by the practice of OECD and EU countries. The higher the social equity index, the higher the per capita GDP level and the smaller income gap. Therefore, the construction of system equity and the promotion of social equity and justice not only promote economic growth, but also narrow the income gap and achieve the goals of efficiency and equity.
【作者單位】： 廈門(mén)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;澳大利亞國(guó)立大學(xué)商學(xué)和經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家留學(xué)基金管理委員會(huì)“2015年國(guó)家建設(shè)高水平大學(xué)公派研究生項(xiàng)目/與澳大利亞國(guó)立大學(xué)合作協(xié)議”(201506310141)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F124.7
，

本文編號(hào)：2073084