本文選題：比較 + 中印　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：中印兩國作為世界舞臺上的兩大新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體,在國際社會中的地位和話語權(quán)不斷提升,兩國積極參與國際事務(wù)和全球治理,在國際舞臺上發(fā)揮了越來越重要的作用。近年來,隨著中印兩國的國際地位日益提高,兩國在國際事務(wù)中的參與度也不斷增強(qiáng),特別是在國際經(jīng)濟(jì)制度中的參與程度也日益加深。本文依據(jù)戰(zhàn)略理基本要素,即戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)、戰(zhàn)略模式和戰(zhàn)略結(jié)果的相關(guān)概念界定全文研究框架,運(yùn)用并且采取案例分析法,選取世界貿(mào)易組織、二十國集團(tuán)和金磚機(jī)制作為研究案例,比較中印兩國在上述三個案例中參與戰(zhàn)略的異同點(diǎn),從而得出中印參與國際經(jīng)濟(jì)制度戰(zhàn)略的一般性結(jié)論。在世界貿(mào)易組織中,中印兩國都有加強(qiáng)國際貿(mào)易聯(lián)系的共同戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo),不同的是中國旨在融入多邊貿(mào)易體制,而印度則更多的希望利用世貿(mào)規(guī)則。在參與模式上,中印兩國都采取均勢和聯(lián)盟戰(zhàn)略模式,但是印度在聯(lián)盟戰(zhàn)略模式的使用上更加靈活主動。通過兩國各自的參與,中印雙方貿(mào)易有了快速發(fā)展,同時有效影響了多哈談判進(jìn)程。不僅如此,中國成功融入了多邊貿(mào)易體制,而印度成為了世貿(mào)組織中發(fā)展中國家的領(lǐng)頭羊。在二十國集團(tuán)機(jī)制中,中印雙方制定了推動國際金融體系改革的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo),不同的是,中國希望進(jìn)一步提升自己在全球經(jīng)濟(jì)治理中的地位,而印度則更加關(guān)注經(jīng)濟(jì)穩(wěn)定和發(fā)展問題。在參與模式上,中印采取了均勢和聯(lián)盟戰(zhàn)略模式,但是中國在聯(lián)盟中發(fā)揮了更大的作用。通過兩國參與,中印在二十國集團(tuán)中成功推動了國際貨幣基金組織改革,但是總體而言,中國的影響力要高于印度。在金磚國家機(jī)制中,中印都有提升新興國家地位的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo),但是不同的是,中國更希望加強(qiáng)新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體聯(lián)系,而印度則希望獲得更大的政治收益。中印兩國采取了不同的戰(zhàn)略模式,印度采取了均勢戰(zhàn)略模式,而中國采取了統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線模式,最終中印推動金磚成立了金磚國家開發(fā)銀行,印度通過金磚國際地位提升比中國更加顯著。通過對中印兩國戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)的分析,可以得出結(jié)論:中印雙方都將自己定義為新興大國,同時仍是發(fā)展中國家,但是不同的是,對中國意圖的判斷上,印度認(rèn)為中國會對其產(chǎn)生威脅。在參與國際經(jīng)濟(jì)制度過程中,中印雙方較為偏好均勢戰(zhàn)略模式和聯(lián)盟戰(zhàn)略模式,總體而言,印度的聯(lián)盟戰(zhàn)略模式運(yùn)用比中國更為靈活有效。未來,中印雙方在參與國際經(jīng)濟(jì)制度過程中,仍有較為廣闊的合作空間,中印兩國應(yīng)該中印兩國進(jìn)一步深化在國際經(jīng)濟(jì)制度中的合作,可以經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展為戰(zhàn)略重心,在合作中不斷增進(jìn)戰(zhàn)略互信,聯(lián)合廣大發(fā)展中國家,最終為維護(hù)中印兩國國家利益和目標(biāo)服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:As two big emerging economies on the world stage, China and India have been playing an increasingly important role in international affairs and global governance. In recent years, with the increasing international status of China and India, the participation of the two countries in international affairs is also increasing, especially in the international economic system. According to the basic elements of strategic theory, that is, strategic objectives, strategic models and strategic results, this paper defines the research framework of the full text, applies and adopts the case analysis method, selects the World Trade Organization (WTO). The Group of Twenty and the BRICS mechanism are used as research cases to compare the similarities and differences of the participation strategies of China and India in the above three cases, so as to draw a general conclusion of the strategy of China and India's participation in the international economic system. In the World Trade Organization, both China and India share a common strategic goal of strengthening international trade ties. The difference is that China aims to integrate into the multilateral trading system, while India hopes to make more use of WTO rules. In the participation mode, both China and India adopt the balance of power and alliance strategy model, but India is more flexible and active in the use of alliance strategy model. Through their respective participation, trade between China and India has developed rapidly and has effectively affected the Doha negotiation process. Not only that, China has been successfully integrated into the multilateral trading system, and India has become the leader of developing countries in the WTO. In the G20 mechanism, China and India have set out strategic goals to promote the reform of the international financial system. The difference is that China hopes to further enhance its position in global economic governance. India, on the other hand, is more concerned about economic stability and development. In the participation mode, China and India adopted the balance of power and alliance strategy mode, but China played a greater role in the alliance. With the participation of both countries, China and India successfully pushed for IMF reform in the G20, but overall, China has more influence than India. In the BRICS mechanism, both China and India have a strategic goal of promoting emerging countries, but unlike China, which wants stronger links with emerging economies, India wants greater political gains. China and India have adopted different strategic models, India has adopted a balance of power model, and China has adopted a United front model, and eventually China and India have promoted the establishment of the BRICS Development Bank. India's rise in international status through BRICS is more pronounced than China's. Through the analysis of the strategic objectives of China and India, we can draw a conclusion that both China and India define themselves as emerging powers and are still developing countries, but the difference is that they judge China's intentions. India sees China as a threat. In the process of participating in the international economic system, China and India prefer the balance of power strategy model and the alliance strategy model. In general, India's alliance strategy model is more flexible and effective than China's. In the future, China and India will still have a relatively broad scope for cooperation in the process of participating in the international economic system. China and India should further deepen their cooperation in the international economic system so that economic development can be the strategic focus. In cooperation, we will continue to enhance strategic mutual trust, unite with the vast number of developing countries, and ultimately serve the interests and objectives of both countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F125;F135.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 屠新泉;;“入世”15年:中國在全球貿(mào)易治理中的角色變遷[J];國際商務(wù)研究;2016年06期

2 李楊;;印度對G20的定位、立場與參與策略[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2016年09期

3 金燦榮;古明明;;熱話題與冷思考——關(guān)于二十國集團(tuán)與全球治理中的中國角色的對話[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會主義;2016年04期

4 徐凡;;印度的G20戰(zhàn)略與全球治理利益訴求[J];南亞研究;2015年03期

5 劉宗義;;“二十國集團(tuán)”轉(zhuǎn)型與中國的作用[J];現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系;2015年07期

6 蒲俜;;金磚國家機(jī)制在中國多邊外交中的定位[J];教學(xué)與研究;2014年10期

7 劉曉燕;孟雪;;淺析中印參與“金磚國家”合作機(jī)制的動因[J];南亞研究季刊;2014年03期

8 周躍雪;;WTO多邊貿(mào)易體制下成員談判集團(tuán)制度與中國的策略[J];社會科學(xué)研究;2014年05期

9 趙可金;;中國國際戰(zhàn)略中的金磚國家合作[J];國際觀察;2014年03期

10 劉宏松;;合法性、有效性與G20機(jī)制改革[J];國際觀察;2014年03期

，

本文編號：1856560