本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國經(jīng)濟—環(huán)境系統(tǒng)的績效評價方法研究　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 績效指標(biāo) 方向性距離函數(shù) DEA 決策者選擇偏好 差異性分析

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，能源消費量不斷上升，能源、經(jīng)濟、環(huán)境系統(tǒng)不協(xié)調(diào)因素也日益突出。能源是系統(tǒng)的物質(zhì)支撐，經(jīng)濟是系統(tǒng)的核心，環(huán)境是系統(tǒng)的空間支撐，所以對系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行績效測算具有重要意義。廣義上，測算系統(tǒng)績效能監(jiān)督國家的宏觀政策的實施情況，評價宏觀政策是否有效。狹義上，測算系統(tǒng)績效能評判各個省市投入產(chǎn)出的冗余或不足，從而幫助其達(dá)到最佳生產(chǎn)實踐。 本文將經(jīng)濟-環(huán)境系統(tǒng)看成一個兩階段生產(chǎn)過程，，第一階段為經(jīng)濟發(fā)展子系統(tǒng)，第二階段為環(huán)境治理子系統(tǒng)。能源是第一階段經(jīng)濟子系統(tǒng)除了勞動和資本以外的一個重要的投入。在充分考慮非期望產(chǎn)出的基礎(chǔ)上，建立了基于方向性距離函數(shù)的兩階段網(wǎng)絡(luò)DEA模型，從而測算出系統(tǒng)的績效指標(biāo)。另外，由于系統(tǒng)內(nèi)外環(huán)境的變化，決策者對各個子過程的偏好也不同，所以本文通過分析不同年份決策者選擇偏好，建立了基于決策者選擇偏好的兩階段關(guān)聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)DEA模型，測算出效率值后與無決策者選擇偏好模型測算的效率進(jìn)行差異性分析。 本文選取了2006-2012年全國30個省、市、自治區(qū)的數(shù)據(jù)為樣本進(jìn)行實證分析，利用所建立的模型測算了各地區(qū)每一子系統(tǒng)的技術(shù)效率、節(jié)能和減排指數(shù)等績效指標(biāo)，并進(jìn)行了區(qū)域間的比較分析。對不同模型所得的績效指標(biāo)和東、中、西部的績效指標(biāo)進(jìn)行差異性分析。根據(jù)決策者選擇偏好模型測算的績效指標(biāo)進(jìn)行分組分析，將30個地區(qū)分為4類，分析原因并提出相應(yīng)的建議。分析結(jié)果表明：非決策者選擇偏好模型通常會高估系統(tǒng)績效指標(biāo)，決策者選擇偏好模型計算結(jié)果更準(zhǔn)確；我國東、中、西部的績效值存在一定的差異，但是不同年份的績效值差異性更為顯著。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy, energy consumption is rising, energy, economy and environment system disharmony is also increasingly prominent. Energy is the material support of the system, economy is the core of the system, and the environment is the space support of the system. So it is important to measure the performance of the system. In a broad sense, measuring the performance of the system can supervise the implementation of the national macro-policy, evaluate whether the macro-policy is effective. In a narrow sense. Measuring the system performance can judge the redundancy or deficiency of input and output in each province and province, thus help it to achieve the best production practice. In this paper, the economic-environmental system is regarded as a two-stage production process, the first stage is the subsystem of economic development. The second stage is the environmental governance subsystem. Energy is an important input of the first stage economic subsystem besides labor and capital. A two-stage network DEA model based on directional distance function is established to measure the performance of the system. In addition, due to the change of environment inside and outside the system, the decision makers' preferences for each sub-process are also different. Therefore, by analyzing the preference of decision makers in different years, this paper establishes a two-stage correlation network DEA model based on the preference of decision makers. After calculating the efficiency value, the difference analysis is made between the efficiency of the model and that of the non-decision maker's preference model. In this paper, the data of 30 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions from 2006 to 2012 are selected for empirical analysis, and the technical efficiency of each subsystem in each region is calculated by using the established model. Energy saving and emission reduction index and other performance indicators, and the comparative analysis between regions. The performance indicators obtained from different models and east, middle. According to the decision makers' preference model, the performance indicators are grouped and analyzed, and the 30 regions are divided into 4 categories. The analysis results show that the non-decision makers' preference model usually overestimates the system performance index and the decision maker's preference model is more accurate. There are some differences in the performance values of east, middle and west of China, but the differences of performance values in different years are more significant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：X821;F124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 崔和瑞;王娣;;基于VAR模型的我國能源-經(jīng)濟-環(huán)境(3E)系統(tǒng)研究[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年01期

2 雷明;中國資源-能源-經(jīng)濟-環(huán)境綜合投入產(chǎn)出表及綠色稅費核算分析[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2001年04期

3 汪克亮;楊寶臣;楊力;;中國省際能源利用的環(huán)境效率測度模型與實證研究[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2011年01期

4 盧向前;張學(xué)青;;能源：在經(jīng)濟增長與環(huán)境保護(hù)中尋找平衡——解讀《BP世界能源統(tǒng)計2007》[J];國際石油經(jīng)濟;2007年07期

5 李廉水;周勇;;技術(shù)進(jìn)步能提高能源效率嗎?——基于中國工業(yè)部門的實證檢驗[J];管理世界;2006年10期

6 鄧玉勇;杜銘華;雷仲敏;;基于能源—經(jīng)濟—環(huán)境(3E)系統(tǒng)的模型方法研究綜述[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2006年03期

7 李蘭冰;;我國區(qū)域科技創(chuàng)新效率評價——以省際數(shù)據(jù)為樣本[J];科技管理研究;2008年09期

8 門惠芹;張啟敏;;銀川市人口、資源、環(huán)境與經(jīng)濟協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的多目標(biāo)規(guī)劃模型[J];寧夏農(nóng)林科技;2009年06期

9 曾鳴;王亞娟;;基于主成分分析法的我國能源、經(jīng)濟、環(huán)境系統(tǒng)耦合協(xié)調(diào)度研究[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年03期

本文編號：1356459