發(fā)布時間：2019-02-18 12:06

【摘要】：文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)工作是一項(xiàng)任重道遠(yuǎn)的社會公益事業(yè),保護(hù)主體應(yīng)為社會公眾,無論遺產(chǎn)處于發(fā)達(dá)城市亦或是偏遠(yuǎn)山區(qū),都應(yīng)調(diào)動遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)區(qū)居民對遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)的認(rèn)知度與責(zé)任感,文化遺產(chǎn)才能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)長遠(yuǎn)保護(hù)與發(fā)展。在文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)工作實(shí)踐中,常常面臨文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)區(qū)與居民生活區(qū)相重疊的狀況,部分遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)工作的方式和理念會影響居民正常生產(chǎn)生活,導(dǎo)致遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)工作與當(dāng)?shù)鼐用駥?jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展渴求的背離。并且大多遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)區(qū)在保護(hù)和展示過程中并未充分發(fā)掘出遺產(chǎn)的文化價值、保護(hù)區(qū)缺乏合理的發(fā)展策略,文化遺產(chǎn)利用方式單一,由此產(chǎn)生遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)區(qū)內(nèi)人口發(fā)展的強(qiáng)大壓力、相對落后的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況以及社區(qū)貧困問題,區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展的非均衡性表現(xiàn)明顯。 針對遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)區(qū)面臨的非均衡發(fā)展問題,本文以漢陰鳳堰梯田作為研究對象,通過對鳳堰梯田所在區(qū)域進(jìn)行分析,試圖探索出破解遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)區(qū)非均衡發(fā)展問題的途徑。本文首先介紹區(qū)域非均衡發(fā)展理論、文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)利用、文化與區(qū)域關(guān)系的研究現(xiàn)狀,其次論述目前存在于遺產(chǎn)地所在區(qū)域內(nèi)、外的非均衡發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,著重分析遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)區(qū)區(qū)域內(nèi)、外非均衡發(fā)展產(chǎn)生的原因,從而引出本文的論點(diǎn)——遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)能夠破解區(qū)域發(fā)展的非均衡。再次,進(jìn)行案例實(shí)證分析。引入漢陰鳳堰梯田保護(hù)發(fā)展的案例,通過評估漢陰鳳堰梯田所在區(qū)域內(nèi)、外在進(jìn)行保護(hù)規(guī)劃方案制定與實(shí)施前后的狀況變化,證明文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)同區(qū)域發(fā)展可以趨于均衡。同時,將這一論點(diǎn)進(jìn)行擴(kuò)展研究,引入龍崗寺遺址所在區(qū)域現(xiàn)狀,對其今后在文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)和諧發(fā)展應(yīng)用前景上進(jìn)行探討,最終得出文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)可以破解遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)區(qū)區(qū)域非均衡發(fā)展問題的結(jié)論。本研究還存在很多不足之處,敬希各位糾繆指正。
[Abstract]:The protection of cultural heritage is a social public undertaking with a long way to go. The main body of protection should be the public. Whether the heritage is in a developed city or in a remote mountain area, the residents of the heritage reserve should be mobilized to have a sense of awareness and responsibility for the protection of the heritage. Cultural heritage can realize long-term protection and development. In the practice of cultural heritage protection, it is often faced with the situation that the cultural heritage protection areas overlap with the residents' living areas. The ways and concepts of some heritage protection work will affect the normal production and life of the residents. This has led to a departure between heritage conservation and local residents' thirst for economic development. And most of the protected areas have not fully excavated the cultural value of the heritage in the process of protection and display, the protection areas lack of reasonable development strategy, the way of cultural heritage utilization is single, resulting in the strong pressure of population development in the heritage reserves. Relative backward economic situation and community poverty, the regional economic and social development of uneven performance. Aiming at the problem of unbalanced development in the heritage reserve, this paper takes the Fengyan terrace in Hanyin as the research object, through the analysis of the area where the terrace lies, attempts to explore the way to solve the unbalanced development of the heritage reserve. This paper first introduces the theory of regional unbalanced development, the protection and utilization of cultural heritage, the current research status of cultural and regional relations, and then discusses the current situation of unbalanced development in and outside the heritage area. This paper mainly analyzes the causes of the unbalanced development in the area of heritage reserves, which leads to the argument that the protection of heritage can solve the disequilibrium of the development of the region. Again, the case empirical analysis. This paper introduces the case of the protection and development of Hanyin Fengyan terrace, and proves that the cultural heritage protection and the regional development can be balanced by evaluating the changes of the situation before and after the establishment and implementation of the protection planning scheme for the terraced field of Hanyin Phoenix Weir. At the same time, the thesis is extended to the present situation of Longgang Temple site, and the prospect of its application in the protection of cultural heritage and the harmonious development of regional economy in the future is discussed. Finally, the conclusion that the protection of cultural heritage can solve the problem of unbalanced development of heritage reserves. There are still many shortcomings in this study. I hope you can correct it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：K87

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 任俊英;吳江;;我國古村落旅游研究進(jìn)展[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2010年19期

2 袁家冬,張娜,曹藝民;莫莫格國家級自然保護(hù)區(qū)旅游資源的保護(hù)與開發(fā)[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2005年03期

3 角媛梅,程國棟,肖篤寧;哈尼梯田文化景觀及其保護(hù)研究[J];地理研究;2002年06期

4 鄭威;余秀忠;;生態(tài)博物館旅游與文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2007年09期

5 耀平,焦黎,蒙莉;新疆文化遺址旅游資源及開發(fā)思路[J];干旱區(qū)地理;2000年02期

6 楊竹莘;;區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)差異理論的發(fā)展與演變評析[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年08期

7 王興斌;“體驗(yàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)”新論與旅游服務(wù)的創(chuàng)新——《體驗(yàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)》讀書札記[J];桂林旅游高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

8 胡靜;基于生物多樣性保護(hù)條件下的旅游資源開發(fā)研究——以湖北九宮山自然保護(hù)區(qū)為例[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2005年03期

9 歐人;關(guān)于地域文化與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展問題的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2004年05期

10 夏紫晶;梁林煒;;論地域文化對區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的影響——以壯鄉(xiāng)文化為例[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)視角(下);2010年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 徐艷芳;區(qū)域文化產(chǎn)業(yè)開發(fā)的比較優(yōu)勢研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

2 李沛瑜;關(guān)于納什均衡問題的若干研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2425817