農(nóng)地承包權實施的非市場環(huán)境：內(nèi)涵、感知與影響
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-17 09:11
【摘要】：當前對農(nóng)地產(chǎn)權相關問題研究的過程中,多強調(diào)市場本位,而對非市場問題關注不夠。據(jù)此,為厘清農(nóng)地產(chǎn)權實施中非市場環(huán)境的存在及其影響,本文以“現(xiàn)象—現(xiàn)象感知—感知影響”為研究線索,以農(nóng)地承包權非市場環(huán)境為研究對象,綜合了主觀與客觀、定性與定量相結合的方法論,通過相關文獻和理論的梳理對農(nóng)地承包權的非市場環(huán)境做出了內(nèi)涵界定,通過問卷調(diào)查和測量模型對農(nóng)地承包權非市場環(huán)境農(nóng)戶感知做出實證測度,通過結構方程模型量化研究了農(nóng)地承包權非市場環(huán)境農(nóng)戶感知對土地流轉的影響。研究主要結論包括:⑴農(nóng)地承包權的非市場環(huán)境是在一定的時間和空間范圍內(nèi),農(nóng)戶、政府、非農(nóng)民的涉農(nóng)資本主動地、有目的地通過行政、關系等非市場手段對農(nóng)地承包權的相關利益進行交易和配置時所持有的農(nóng)地價值觀念、態(tài)度和遵循的制度、倫理規(guī)范以及政治機制等因素構成的市場外部環(huán)境。⑵非市場環(huán)境的要素包括環(huán)境參與者以及參與者之間的相互聯(lián)系與作用。農(nóng)地承包權的非市場環(huán)境主體包括了農(nóng)地承包權相關利益的個人、群體及組織。按非市場環(huán)境參與主體,可將當前農(nóng)村農(nóng)地承包權非市場環(huán)境分為政府行政干預、地方文化關聯(lián)和社會組織參與三類。⑶農(nóng)戶對農(nóng)地承包權的感知可分為對政府行政干預的感知、對地方文化關聯(lián)的感知和對社會組織參與的感知,開發(fā)了相應的感知量表,量表α系數(shù)(0.803)和KMO值(0.792)通過了量表效度信度檢驗,因子分析結果表明測量模型可用。實證測度樣區(qū)農(nóng)戶非市場感知程度權重大小關系為:政府行政干預(36.79%)地方文化關聯(lián)(32.12%)社會組織參與(31.09%)。說明農(nóng)戶在承包權實施過程中感知最強烈的是政府行政干預。⑷農(nóng)戶對非市場環(huán)境的感知對土地流轉具有重要影響,從單個角度看,內(nèi)生變量的三種非市場環(huán)境感知對土地流轉影響的路徑系數(shù)為0.82、0.78、0.63,皆為正向影響,因此三種非市場環(huán)境感知均對土地流轉其積極促進作用。從綜合角度看,內(nèi)生變量地方文化關聯(lián)感知和政府行政干預感知、社會組織參與感知都存在負向影響關系,路徑系數(shù)分別為-0.61,-0.52,這種感知代表了非市場環(huán)境間存在的沖突,而這種沖突的存在間接地抑制了土地流轉。⑸針對非市場環(huán)境感知對土地流轉的影響,本文政策建議如下:政府應深刻理解當前非市場環(huán)境的客觀性以及三類非市場環(huán)境存在的沖突,在理解農(nóng)民內(nèi)生文化的基礎上,合理介入農(nóng)地使用權實施過程,且在介入過程中加強溝通理解以及相應的宣傳效率,加強不同類別非市場環(huán)境的協(xié)同作用,可有效提高土地流轉。
[Abstract]:In the current research process of farmland property right, the market standard is emphasized, but the non-market problem is not paid enough attention to. Accordingly, in order to clarify the existence and influence of non-market environment in the implementation of farmland property right, this paper takes "phenomenon-phenomenon perception-perceived impact" as the research clue, takes the non-market environment of farmland contract right as the research object, synthesizes the subjective and objective. The methodology of combining qualitative and quantitative methods defines the non-market environment of farmland contract right by combing relevant literature and theory. Through questionnaire survey and measurement model, this paper makes an empirical measure of farmers' perception of non-market environment of farmland contract right, and quantifies the influence of farmers' perception of non-market environment on land circulation through structural equation model. The main conclusions are as follows: 1 the non-market environment of farmland contract right is within a certain time and space, the agricultural capital of farmers, governments and non-farmers actively and purposefully through the administration. The value, attitude and system of agricultural land held by non-market means, such as relations, when dealing with and allocating the related interests of farmland contract right, The elements of non-market environment include environmental participants and their interrelation and function. The non-market environmental subject of farmland contract right includes individuals, groups and organizations concerned with farmland contract right. According to the participation subject of non-market environment, the current non-market environment of rural farmland contracting right can be divided into government administrative intervention. There are three types of local cultural association and social organization participation. 3 the farmers' perception of farmland contract right can be divided into three categories: the perception of government administrative intervention, the perception of local cultural association and the perception of social organization participation, and the development of the corresponding perception scale. The 偽 -coefficient (0.803) and KMO (0.792) of the scale passed the validity test of the scale, and the factor analysis showed that the measuring model was available. The relationship between the weights of farmers' non-market perception degree and that of government administration intervention (36.79%), local cultural association (32.12%) and social organization participation (31.09%). It shows that the most powerful perception of farmers in the implementation of the contract right is the government administrative intervention. 4 the perception of non-market environment has an important impact on the land circulation, from a single point of view, The path coefficient of the three kinds of non-market environmental perception of endogenous variables on land circulation is 0.820.780.63, which is all positive, so the three kinds of non-market environmental perception can positively promote the land circulation. From a comprehensive point of view, there is a negative relationship between the perception of local cultural association of endogenous variables and the perception of government administrative intervention, and the perception of social organization participation has a negative relationship, and the path coefficient is -0.61- 0.52, respectively. This perception represents the conflict between the non-market environment, and the existence of the conflict indirectly inhibits the land circulation. 5 in view of the impact of the non-market environment perception on the land circulation, The policy suggestions of this paper are as follows: the government should deeply understand the objectivity of the current non-market environment and the conflicts existing in the three kinds of non-market environments. On the basis of understanding the farmers' endogenous culture, the government should reasonably intervene in the implementation process of the right to use agricultural land. In the process of intervention, it can effectively improve the land circulation by strengthening the communication and understanding and the corresponding propaganda efficiency, and strengthening the synergy of different kinds of non-market environment.
【學位授予單位】：甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F321.1
本文編號：2409864
[Abstract]:In the current research process of farmland property right, the market standard is emphasized, but the non-market problem is not paid enough attention to. Accordingly, in order to clarify the existence and influence of non-market environment in the implementation of farmland property right, this paper takes "phenomenon-phenomenon perception-perceived impact" as the research clue, takes the non-market environment of farmland contract right as the research object, synthesizes the subjective and objective. The methodology of combining qualitative and quantitative methods defines the non-market environment of farmland contract right by combing relevant literature and theory. Through questionnaire survey and measurement model, this paper makes an empirical measure of farmers' perception of non-market environment of farmland contract right, and quantifies the influence of farmers' perception of non-market environment on land circulation through structural equation model. The main conclusions are as follows: 1 the non-market environment of farmland contract right is within a certain time and space, the agricultural capital of farmers, governments and non-farmers actively and purposefully through the administration. The value, attitude and system of agricultural land held by non-market means, such as relations, when dealing with and allocating the related interests of farmland contract right, The elements of non-market environment include environmental participants and their interrelation and function. The non-market environmental subject of farmland contract right includes individuals, groups and organizations concerned with farmland contract right. According to the participation subject of non-market environment, the current non-market environment of rural farmland contracting right can be divided into government administrative intervention. There are three types of local cultural association and social organization participation. 3 the farmers' perception of farmland contract right can be divided into three categories: the perception of government administrative intervention, the perception of local cultural association and the perception of social organization participation, and the development of the corresponding perception scale. The 偽 -coefficient (0.803) and KMO (0.792) of the scale passed the validity test of the scale, and the factor analysis showed that the measuring model was available. The relationship between the weights of farmers' non-market perception degree and that of government administration intervention (36.79%), local cultural association (32.12%) and social organization participation (31.09%). It shows that the most powerful perception of farmers in the implementation of the contract right is the government administrative intervention. 4 the perception of non-market environment has an important impact on the land circulation, from a single point of view, The path coefficient of the three kinds of non-market environmental perception of endogenous variables on land circulation is 0.820.780.63, which is all positive, so the three kinds of non-market environmental perception can positively promote the land circulation. From a comprehensive point of view, there is a negative relationship between the perception of local cultural association of endogenous variables and the perception of government administrative intervention, and the perception of social organization participation has a negative relationship, and the path coefficient is -0.61- 0.52, respectively. This perception represents the conflict between the non-market environment, and the existence of the conflict indirectly inhibits the land circulation. 5 in view of the impact of the non-market environment perception on the land circulation, The policy suggestions of this paper are as follows: the government should deeply understand the objectivity of the current non-market environment and the conflicts existing in the three kinds of non-market environments. On the basis of understanding the farmers' endogenous culture, the government should reasonably intervene in the implementation process of the right to use agricultural land. In the process of intervention, it can effectively improve the land circulation by strengthening the communication and understanding and the corresponding propaganda efficiency, and strengthening the synergy of different kinds of non-market environment.
【學位授予單位】：甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F321.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 宋宜農(nóng);;新型城鎮(zhèn)化背景下我國農(nóng)村土地流轉問題研究[J];經(jīng)濟問題;2017年02期
2 張曉山;;農(nóng)村基層治理結構:現(xiàn)狀、問題與展望[J];求索;2016年07期
3 樓建波;;農(nóng)戶承包經(jīng)營的農(nóng)地流轉的三權分置——一個功能主義的分析路徑[J];南開學報(哲學社會科學版);2016年04期
4 李升發(fā);李秀彬;;耕地撂荒研究進展與展望[J];地理學報;2016年03期
5 黃靜;;“三權分置”下農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權流轉規(guī)范問題研究[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學學報;2015年04期
6 高圣平;;新型農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)營體系下農(nóng)地產(chǎn)權結構的法律邏輯[J];法學研究;2014年04期
7 陳妙香;;農(nóng)業(yè)轉移人口市民化視角下的農(nóng)地產(chǎn)權制度改革[J];金融經(jīng)濟;2014年12期
8 葉必豐;;城鎮(zhèn)化中土地征收補償?shù)钠降仍瓌t[J];中國法學;2014年03期
9 潘迪;彭紀生;;非市場戰(zhàn)略對創(chuàng)新績效的影響[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟研究;2013年04期
10 王書明;劉元勝;郭沛;;不同用途農(nóng)村集體土地征收中的收益分配研究——以遼寧省遼陽市為例[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟問題;2012年10期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 賀遠瓊;企業(yè)整合市場環(huán)境與非市場環(huán)境的行為模式研究[D];華中科技大學;2006年
，本文編號：2409864
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2409864.html
最近更新
教材專著
