【摘要】：本文從經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的視角,運(yùn)用規(guī)范分析和實(shí)證分析的方法,探討了傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民向新型農(nóng)民演進(jìn)的機(jī)制,分析了我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民向新型農(nóng)民演進(jìn)滯后的制約因素,然后,在上述研究的基礎(chǔ)上提出推動(dòng)我國(guó)新型農(nóng)民成長(zhǎng)的政策建議。首先,本文通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的整理、歸納,厘清了新型農(nóng)民的定義,分析了傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民與新型農(nóng)民的區(qū)別。然后,介紹發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民向新型轉(zhuǎn)型的經(jīng)驗(yàn),重點(diǎn)分析東亞模式、北美模式和西歐模式特點(diǎn)。通過(guò)分析得出推動(dòng)新型農(nóng)民成長(zhǎng)的主要?jiǎng)恿κ羌夹g(shù)進(jìn)步和制度創(chuàng)新。其次,構(gòu)建傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民新型農(nóng)民演進(jìn)的機(jī)制模型,提出技術(shù)進(jìn)步和制度創(chuàng)新是傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民向新型農(nóng)民演進(jìn)的動(dòng)力。在動(dòng)力作用下,傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民通過(guò)農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)規(guī)�；⑥r(nóng)民組織化和經(jīng)營(yíng)市場(chǎng)化三條路徑實(shí)現(xiàn)向新型農(nóng)民的轉(zhuǎn)型。具體而言,在技術(shù)進(jìn)步和制度創(chuàng)新的推動(dòng)下,通過(guò)勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移、土地流轉(zhuǎn)和農(nóng)村金融服務(wù)這三個(gè)方面為農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)規(guī)�；峁┩恋�、勞動(dòng)力和資金的支持,促進(jìn)了生產(chǎn)規(guī)模化的發(fā)展;通過(guò)農(nóng)民合作組織和農(nóng)業(yè)勞動(dòng)力的分工實(shí)現(xiàn)了農(nóng)民組織化;通過(guò)農(nóng)業(yè)信息化的發(fā)展和農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈的優(yōu)化,實(shí)現(xiàn)了農(nóng)民經(jīng)營(yíng)方式向市場(chǎng)化轉(zhuǎn)變。通過(guò)以上三種途徑,傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民實(shí)現(xiàn)了向新型農(nóng)民的轉(zhuǎn)型。最后,分析了制約我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民向新型農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)型的因素。當(dāng)前,我國(guó)新型農(nóng)民成長(zhǎng)滯后,原因是多方面的。本文從制度性和非制度性?xún)蓚�(gè)方面著手分析制約因素。具體而言,制度性因素指的是產(chǎn)權(quán)不明晰的土地制度、城鄉(xiāng)二元結(jié)構(gòu)的戶(hù)籍制度、薄弱的農(nóng)村金融體系和農(nóng)民合作組織運(yùn)行無(wú)序;非制度性因素指的是人力資本因素和粗放的生產(chǎn)方式。然后,在以上分析的基礎(chǔ)上,提出進(jìn)一步促進(jìn)我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)民向新型農(nóng)民演進(jìn)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of economics, this paper discusses the mechanism of the evolution from traditional farmers to new farmers, and analyzes the factors that restrict the evolution from traditional farmers to new farmers, using the methods of normative analysis and empirical analysis. On the basis of the above research, the paper puts forward some policy suggestions to promote the growth of new farmers in China. First of all, this paper clarifies the definition of new farmers and analyzes the differences between traditional farmers and new farmers. Then, the paper introduces the experience of the transition from the traditional farmers to the new type in developed countries, and analyzes the characteristics of the East Asian model, the North American model and the Western European model. Through analysis, the main driving force to promote the growth of new farmers is technological progress and institutional innovation. Secondly, it constructs the mechanism model of the new peasant evolution of traditional farmers, and points out that technological progress and institutional innovation are the driving force of the evolution from traditional farmers to new farmers. Under the action of motive force, the traditional farmer realizes the transformation to the new peasant through the agricultural production scale, the farmer organization and the management marketization. In particular, under the impetus of technological progress and institutional innovation, through the three aspects of labor force transfer, land transfer and rural financial services, we will provide land, labor and financial support for large-scale agricultural production. Promoting the development of production scale; The organization of farmers is realized through the division of labor between farmers' cooperative organizations and agricultural labor, and through the development of agricultural informatization and the optimization of agricultural industry chain, the farmers' management mode is changed to marketization. Through the above three ways, the traditional farmers have realized the transition to the new farmers. Finally, it analyzes the factors restricting the transition from traditional farmers to new farmers. At present, our country new type farmer growth lags behind, the reason is many aspects. This paper analyzes the restrictive factors from institutional and non-institutional aspects. In particular, institutional factors refer to the land system with unclear property rights, the household registration system with urban-rural dual structure, the weak rural financial system and the disordered operation of peasant cooperative organizations. Non-institutional factors refer to human capital factors and extensive production methods. Then, on the basis of the above analysis, some policy suggestions are put forward to further promote the evolution of traditional farmers to new farmers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：聊城大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F323.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳文勝;陸福興;;農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)化為現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展培育新型農(nóng)民[J];求索;2007年11期

2 熊紅穎;壽志敏;;從經(jīng)濟(jì)意義上淺析農(nóng)民組織化問(wèn)題[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2007年04期

3 石火培;成新華;;基于logit模型的江蘇省新型農(nóng)民培養(yǎng)實(shí)證研究[J];職業(yè)技術(shù)教育;2008年31期

，

本文編號(hào)：2369539