【摘要】：農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)對于農(nóng)民來說是一項非常重要的財產(chǎn)性權(quán)利,其能否繼承更是與農(nóng)民的切身利益息息相關(guān)。隨著農(nóng)村社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展,實踐中承包經(jīng)營權(quán)被分置為承包權(quán)和經(jīng)營權(quán),其中經(jīng)營權(quán)越來越多的被流轉(zhuǎn)出去。為了順應農(nóng)民保留承包權(quán)、流轉(zhuǎn)經(jīng)營權(quán)的意愿,中央也正式提出了農(nóng)村土地所有權(quán)、承包權(quán)、經(jīng)營權(quán)“三權(quán)分置”的改革方向,并發(fā)布了一系列相關(guān)文件。在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者認為對于農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)能否繼承的討論轉(zhuǎn)變成對承包權(quán)能否繼承的討論比較符合中央土地改革的精神。由于我國現(xiàn)行法律中雖然對土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的繼承略有涉及但沒有明確細致的法律條文對其進行規(guī)定,理論界一直存在對于該權(quán)利能否繼承的爭論,司法實踐中也存在操作難題。因此,農(nóng)村土地承包權(quán)的繼承問題無論在法律規(guī)定上還是在實踐操作中都是迫切需要解決的問題�，F(xiàn)今,根據(jù)中央對農(nóng)村土地改革提出的“穩(wěn)定農(nóng)村土地承包關(guān)系并保持長久不變”的要求以及土地所有權(quán)、承包權(quán)、經(jīng)營權(quán)“三權(quán)分置”的改革方向來看,正是討論土地承包權(quán)可繼承性的好時機。由于土地承包權(quán)是基于“三權(quán)分置”的提出而分置出來,因此,本文首先闡述了“三權(quán)分置”及“三權(quán)分置”下土地承包權(quán)的內(nèi)涵,同時分析了“三權(quán)分置”下農(nóng)村土地承包權(quán)繼承的必要性。然后通過對中國裁判文書上2016年發(fā)生的土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承糾紛案件的裁判文書進行了梳理、總結(jié),分析了集體所有權(quán)與土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)“兩權(quán)分置”時農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承糾紛案件審理的司法現(xiàn)狀,并總結(jié)了其存在的問題。根據(jù)上述分析,筆者認為,土地所有權(quán)、承包權(quán)、經(jīng)營權(quán)“三權(quán)分置”的提出、中央一貫堅持的“穩(wěn)定土地承包關(guān)系并保持長久不變”的政策要求、以及在農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展中農(nóng)民對土地功能認識的轉(zhuǎn)變,都預示著承認土地承包權(quán)的可繼承性才是符合中央土地改革精神,與時俱進,能夠最大程度發(fā)揮農(nóng)村土地的價值,保護農(nóng)民利益的最優(yōu)選擇。最后,本文在前述分析的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)了“三權(quán)分置”下農(nóng)村土地承包權(quán)繼承存在的障礙并提出了克服路徑,希望能夠在新一輪的農(nóng)村土地改革中貢獻一份力量。
[Abstract]:The right of contracted management of rural land is a very important property right for farmers, and its inheritance is closely related to the vital interests of farmers. With the development of rural society and economy, the contractual management right is divided into contract right and management right in practice, among which more and more management rights are transferred out. In order to comply with the will of farmers to retain contract right and transfer management right, the central government has formally put forward the reform direction of "three separate rights" of rural land ownership, contract right and management right, and issued a series of related documents. On this basis, the author thinks that the discussion on whether the rural land contract management right can be inherited can be transformed into the discussion on whether the contract right can be inherited, which is more in line with the spirit of central land reform. Although the inheritance of the right of land contracting management is slightly involved in the current law of our country, but there is no clear and detailed legal provisions to regulate it, there has always been a debate in the theoretical circle as to whether the right can be inherited. There are also operational problems in judicial practice. Therefore, the inheritance of rural land contract right is an urgent problem to be solved both in law and practice. At present, according to the request of the central government for the rural land reform to "stabilize the rural land contract relationship and keep it unchanged for a long time," and the reform direction of land ownership, contract right and management right, "three rights are divided", It is a good time to discuss the inheritance of land contract right. Because the land contract right is based on the "three rights division", this paper first expounds the connotation of the land contract right under the "three rights separate structure" and "three right split structure". At the same time, it analyzes the necessity of the inheritance of rural land contract right under the "three rights division". Then, through combing and summing up the adjudicative documents of the disputes over the succession of land contracting management rights that occurred in 2016 in China's adjudicative documents, This paper analyzes the judicial status quo of the inheritance dispute cases of rural land contractual management right when collective ownership and land contractual management right "two rights are divided", and summarizes the existing problems. According to the above analysis, the author believes that the policy requirement of "stabilizing the land contract relationship and keeping it unchanged for a long time" has been consistently adhered to by the central government in proposing the "three separate rights" of land ownership, contract right and management right. The change of farmers' understanding of land function in the continuous development of rural economy indicates that the recognition of the inheritance of land contracting right is in line with the spirit of central land reform, keeping pace with the times, and can maximize the value of rural land. The best choice to protect the interests of farmers. Finally, on the basis of the above analysis, this paper summarizes the obstacles existing in the inheritance of the rural land contract right under the "three rights division" and puts forward some ways to overcome it, hoping to contribute to the new round of rural land reform.
【學位授予單位】：安徽財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F321.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李宗錄;王德梅;;論“三權(quán)分置”中土地承包權(quán)與經(jīng)營權(quán)的權(quán)利性質(zhì)[J];石家莊學院學報;2017年01期

，

本文編號：2286625