長沙市不同土地利用方式對土壤理化性質(zhì)及生態(tài)服務(wù)功能的影響
[Abstract]:Five main land use patterns (agricultural land, woodland, grassland, construction land, unused land) in Changsha City were selected as the research objects, and the physical and chemical properties of soil were discussed by means of field investigation and laboratory analysis according to the existing land use data and the criteria of forest ecosystem service function assessment. The ecological service value of Changsha in 2013 (water conservation, soil conservation, carbon sequestration, air purification) was calculated. The research results can provide a reasonable basis for the scientific management and planning of urban land use in Changsha and the formulation of ecological compensation mechanism, which can promote the construction of ecological environment and realize land use in Changsha. The results show that: (1) In the physical and chemical properties of soils under different land use patterns, except grassland, the natural water content of soils under different land use patterns tends to increase with the increase of soil depth, and the change trend is in accordance with soil bulk density, capillary porosity and total capillary porosity. On the contrary, the difference of the same soil layer between different land use patterns was significant (P 0.05); the soil in Changsha was basically acidic, and the contents of total N, total K and total P were low. The organic carbon, total N, total K and total P in the soil of different land use patterns decreased with the depth of the soil, and the vertical distribution of all levels were all decreasing. There is a certain difference in the horizontal distribution, except for the difference between manure-applied agricultural land and other land use methods (P 0.01), there is no significant difference in the total N, total K, total P content in other land use methods. The C/N values of the five land use methods ranged from 2.12 to 21.21, among which the C/N values of forest land and grassland are far higher. (2) Natural water content and bulk density, bulk density and total K, pH and SOC were negatively correlated (P 0.05) among the indexes of soil physical and chemical properties in the whole study area, in which natural water content and bulk density, pH and SOC were negatively correlated (P 0.01), while natural water content and total N, total P, total K were negatively correlated (P 0.01). There was a very significant positive correlation between total P and total K (P 0.01). There was a very significant negative correlation between soil natural water content and bulk density (P 0.01) in different land use patterns. There was a significant positive correlation between total N and total K (P 0.05), and a very significant positive correlation between total N and total K (P 0.01). There are great differences in the value of ecological services per unit area under different land use patterns. Among them, the order of the value of water conservation is as follows: unused land of forest land, agricultural land, grassland construction land, green land, and grassland; unused land of agricultural land, forestland, construction land, grassland, and value of carbon sequestration. The results are as follows: unused land of forestland, grassland, farmland, construction land, green land and grassland; unused land of forestland and grassland; unused land of forestland, construction land, green land, farmland and grassland; unused land of forestland and grassland; unused land of green land and grassland; unused land of forestland and grassland; unused land of forestland, construction land, construction land, green land and grassland; unused land Among the total ecological value, the value of water conservation, soil conservation, carbon sequestration and air purification were 76.07 108, 22.87 108, 12.43 108, 22.46 108, accounting for 56.88%, 17.03%, 9.29%, 16.80% of the total value respectively. The value of water conservation, soil conservation, carbon sequestration and air purification per unit area were 7172.72 yuan/hm, respectively. 22147.52 yuan /hm21171.96 yuan /hm22118.10 yuan /hm2.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:S153;F301.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉云鵬;張社奇;谷潔;解迎革;;不同土地利用方式對陜西黃河濕地土壤水分物理性質(zhì)的影響[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2011年05期
2 李巍,李文軍;用改進(jìn)的旅行費(fèi)用法評估九寨溝的游憩價(jià)值[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2003年04期
3 石龍宇;崔勝輝;尹鍇;劉江;;廈門市土地利用/覆被變化對生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)的影響[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期
4 謝正宇;李文華;謝正君;李新琪;;艾比湖濕地自然保護(hù)區(qū)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)功能價(jià)值評估[J];干旱區(qū)地理;2011年03期
5 馬新輝,孫根年,任志遠(yuǎn);西安市植被凈化大氣物質(zhì)量的測定及其價(jià)值評價(jià)[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2002年04期
6 袁兆華;呂憲國;周嘉;;三江平原旱田耕作對濕地土壤理化性質(zhì)的累積影響初探[J];濕地科學(xué);2006年02期
7 艾夕輝,許建初,高富,楊立新,錢潔,李巧宏;西莊河流域森林生態(tài)系統(tǒng)涵養(yǎng)水源的價(jià)值[J];山地學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
8 歐陽志云,王如松;生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)功能、生態(tài)價(jià)值與可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];世界科技研究與發(fā)展;2000年05期
9 趙軍;楊凱;;生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)價(jià)值評估研究進(jìn)展[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期
10 馬長欣;劉建軍;康博文;孫尚華;任軍輝;;1999—2003年陜西省森林生態(tài)系統(tǒng)固碳釋氧服務(wù)功能價(jià)值評估[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期
,本文編號:2213011
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2213011.html