【摘要】：基于可持續(xù)生計框架,利用浙江省臨安、開化、永康、龍泉等4個縣(市)的調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù),從生計資本、生計策略、生計后果等3個方面比較分析了農(nóng)業(yè)收入為主農(nóng)戶(Ⅰ類農(nóng)戶)和非農(nóng)業(yè)收入為主農(nóng)戶(Ⅱ類農(nóng)戶)的生計狀況。研究結(jié)果表明:在浙江山區(qū),2類農(nóng)戶的生計資本各具優(yōu)勢,Ⅰ類農(nóng)戶物質(zhì)資本和自然資本較為豐裕,最欠缺金融資本;Ⅱ類農(nóng)戶物質(zhì)資本和人力資本較為豐裕,最欠缺自然資本。與Ⅰ類農(nóng)戶相比,Ⅱ類農(nóng)戶勞動時間更少,收入更高,來源更加多樣化,貧困發(fā)生程度更低,對生活的滿意程度更高,但對環(huán)境的不利影響也更大。在應對風險和壓力選擇上,2類農(nóng)戶做出的選擇基本一致,應對風險主要采取借錢、動用儲蓄等較為傳統(tǒng)的方式,面臨的主要生活壓力是改善住房和醫(yī)療費用支出�？傮w來說,Ⅱ類農(nóng)戶的生計狀況要好于Ⅰ類農(nóng)戶。
[Abstract]:Based on the sustainable livelihood framework, using the survey data of four counties (cities) in Lin'an, Kaihua, Yongkang and Longquan in Zhejiang Province, from livelihood capital to livelihood strategy, Three aspects of livelihood consequences were compared and analyzed, such as agricultural income mainly farmers (type I farmers) and non-agricultural income mainly farmers (type II farmers). The results show that the livelihood capital of the two types of farmers in Zhejiang mountainous area has their own advantages, the material capital and the natural capital of the first type farmers are abundant, and the financial capital is the most lacking, and the material capital and human capital of the second type farmers are relatively abundant. Lack of natural capital. Compared with the first type farmers, the second type farmers have less working time, higher income, more diversified sources, lower degree of poverty, higher degree of satisfaction with life, but also greater adverse impact on the environment. The choice of two types of farmers is basically the same in the choice of coping with risk and pressure. The main ways to deal with the risk are borrowing money and using savings. The main living pressure is to improve the expenditure of housing and medical expenses. In general, the livelihood of class 鈪，

本文編號：2188945