發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-29 10:24

【摘要】：在我國(guó)新型城鎮(zhèn)化、工業(yè)化快速推進(jìn)的背景之下,農(nóng)地非農(nóng)化問(wèn)題突出:一方面土地利用方式粗放、使用效率不高,另一方面,由于城鄉(xiāng)二元土地制度的限制,農(nóng)民土地權(quán)益未能得到有效保障。建立城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)一的建設(shè)用地市場(chǎng),盤(pán)活農(nóng)民資產(chǎn)、增加農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入成為深化農(nóng)村土地制度改革的重點(diǎn)內(nèi)容。2015年1月,國(guó)家出臺(tái)了《關(guān)于農(nóng)村土地征收、集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市、宅基地制度改革試點(diǎn)工作的意見(jiàn)》,其中,集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地直接入市打破了城鄉(xiāng)二元土地制度的約束,是一種新的制度安排嘗試。集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市土地增值收益的分配,關(guān)系到國(guó)家、集體和農(nóng)民等多方的切身利益,成為亟需解決的重要現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題。本文以集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地為研究對(duì)象,運(yùn)用理論分析法、案例分析法、比較研究法等研究方法,探討土地增值收益的成因,分別對(duì)現(xiàn)有土地制度下農(nóng)地征收模式和集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市模式的增值收益形成機(jī)理進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析,結(jié)果表明,農(nóng)地征收模式下,政府和開(kāi)發(fā)商享有遠(yuǎn)高于農(nóng)民的土地增值收益,在集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市模式下,政府以收取土地收益調(diào)節(jié)金的方式享有一定比例的增值收益,農(nóng)民集體享有的增值收益大幅提高。進(jìn)一步選擇集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市典型試點(diǎn)地區(qū),從政策、交易情況、增值收益分配等四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了比較分析,研究表明,四個(gè)典型試點(diǎn)地區(qū)均采取拍賣(mài)、掛牌等交易入市,但增值收益水平、分配比例、分配方式存在明顯的地區(qū)差異�？傮w來(lái)講,集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市模式較征收模式使農(nóng)村土地財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利得到凸顯,農(nóng)民集體更好的分享到增值收益�？偨Y(jié)土地增值收益具體實(shí)踐中的經(jīng)驗(yàn),結(jié)合我國(guó)土地增值收益分配中現(xiàn)存的問(wèn)題,從完善法律法規(guī)、優(yōu)化增值收益分配、完善監(jiān)督管理三方面提出了促進(jìn)土地增值收益合理分配的對(duì)策與建議。
[Abstract]:Under the background of new urbanization and rapid development of industrialization in our country, the problem of farmland conversion is prominent: on the one hand, extensive land use mode, inefficient use, on the other hand, because of the restriction of dual land system in urban and rural areas, Farmers' land rights and interests have not been effectively protected. The establishment of a unified construction land market between urban and rural areas, the activation of farmers' assets and the increase of peasants' property income have become the key contents of deepening the reform of the rural land system. Opinions on the pilot work of the Reform of the Collective Management Construction Land and the Housing Base system. Among them, the collective management construction land directly broke the restriction of the dual land system in urban and rural areas, and it is a new institutional arrangement attempt. The distribution of the value-added income of the land entering the market for collective management construction land is related to the vital interests of the country, the collective and the farmers, and has become an important practical problem that needs to be solved. This article takes the collective management construction land as the research object, uses the theory analysis method, the case analysis method, the comparison research method and so on research method, discusses the reason of the land increment income, The paper compares and analyzes the mechanism of value-added income formation of farmland expropriation model and collective management construction land market entry model under the existing land system. The results show that, under the farmland expropriation mode, The government and the developers enjoy much higher land value-added income than the farmers. Under the mode of collective management construction land entering the market, the government receives a certain proportion of the value-added income in the form of land income adjustment fees. The value-added income enjoyed by farmers collectively has increased substantially. Further selecting the collective operating construction land to enter the typical pilot areas of the city, from the policy, transaction situation, value-added income distribution and other four aspects of comparative analysis, the study shows that the four typical pilot areas are auctioned. Listing and other transactions enter the market, but there are significant regional differences in value-added income level, distribution ratio and distribution mode. Generally speaking, the collective management construction land market mode than the expropriation model makes the rural land property rights prominent, farmers share better value-added income. Summing up the experience in the concrete practice of land value-added income, combining with the existing problems in the distribution of land value-added income in our country, from perfecting laws and regulations, optimizing the distribution of value-added income, The countermeasures and suggestions of improving supervision and management are put forward to promote the rational distribution of land value-added income.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F321.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 樊帆;;影響集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地流轉(zhuǎn)收益分配方式的主要因素——基于微觀主體農(nóng)戶(hù)的調(diào)查[J];理論與改革;2015年05期

2 沈孝強(qiáng);吳次芳;陸汝成;;集體建設(shè)用地使用權(quán)入市改革的利益衡量:一個(gè)分析框架[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2015年02期

3 黃發(fā)儒;;集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市路徑思考[J];中國(guó)土地;2015年02期

4 牛宏;;城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)一用地市場(chǎng)下農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地入市的思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2014年09期

5 黃卓;蒙達(dá);張占錄;;基于“漲價(jià)歸公”思想的大陸征地補(bǔ)償模式改革——借鑒臺(tái)灣市地重劃與區(qū)段征收經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];臺(tái)灣農(nóng)業(yè)探索;2014年03期

6 張鵬;;當(dāng)前農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地制度改革若干構(gòu)想[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

7 劉英博;;集體土地增值收益權(quán)歸屬的分析與重構(gòu)[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

8 郭世強(qiáng);羅崇亮;游斌;;農(nóng)村集體建設(shè)用地流轉(zhuǎn)收益分配研究——基于公平與效率視角[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2014年06期

9 朱一中;曹裕;;農(nóng)地非農(nóng)化過(guò)程中的土地增值收益分配研究——基于土地發(fā)展權(quán)的視角[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2012年10期

10 汪煜;;集體建設(shè)用地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)收益分配研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 樊帆;集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地流轉(zhuǎn)收益分配問(wèn)題研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 葉茂林;集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地流轉(zhuǎn)增值收益分配的法律制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2152382