發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-16 15:41

【摘要】：基于臨汾市安澤縣冀氏鎮(zhèn)溝口村(退耕還生態(tài)林)和吉縣車城鄉(xiāng)車城村(退耕還經(jīng)濟(jì)林)退耕還林的實(shí)地調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù),運(yùn)用的框架為國(guó)際上比較常用的研究生態(tài)工程影響的可持續(xù)生計(jì)框架,并建立了相對(duì)應(yīng)的關(guān)于生計(jì)狀況評(píng)價(jià)的一系列指標(biāo)體系。本文從生計(jì)資本、生計(jì)策略、生計(jì)結(jié)果三個(gè)方面對(duì)溝口村(退耕還生態(tài)林)和車城村(退耕還經(jīng)濟(jì)林)的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行了比較研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)兩者之間的差異與各自存在的不足,并對(duì)該工程后續(xù)相關(guān)政策的期望幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了研究和敘述,并提出相關(guān)建議。最后分析得出了如下幾個(gè)主要結(jié)論:(1)生計(jì)資本比較方面,溝口村在自然資本方面比車城村更為充足,車城村由于位于鄉(xiāng)政府駐地,物質(zhì)資本、人力資本和金融資本優(yōu)于溝口村;社會(huì)資本方面差異不大。車城村由于優(yōu)勢(shì)的資本條件使得其生計(jì)策略和生計(jì)結(jié)果都比溝口村好一些。(2)兩村農(nóng)戶的生計(jì)策略的方面,車城村由于其有利的地理位置和蘋果產(chǎn)業(yè),需要投入的勞動(dòng)力較多,使得農(nóng)戶收入來源主要為農(nóng)業(yè)和打工;而相對(duì)偏僻的溝口村因主要種植玉米而使農(nóng)業(yè)收入占據(jù)了較大比例。(3)兩村農(nóng)戶生計(jì)結(jié)果方面,車城村由于優(yōu)勢(shì)的資本條件使得其生計(jì)結(jié)果比溝口村好一些。無(wú)論是退耕農(nóng)戶的貧困率,還是非退耕農(nóng)戶的貧困率,車城村的農(nóng)戶貧困率都低于溝口村的。(4)兩村絕大多數(shù)的農(nóng)戶都愿意維護(hù)已有的退耕還林成果,并且都對(duì)國(guó)家的補(bǔ)貼期限和資金不是太滿意,希望以后能加大這方面的支持。最后,針對(duì)兩村退耕還林存在的不足,提出相應(yīng)的建議,希望為以后相關(guān)政策的發(fā)展提高現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。
[Abstract]:Based on the field investigation data of Goukou Village in Jishi Town, Anze County, Linfen City, and Checheng Village (returning farmland to Economic Forest) in Checheng and Rural areas of Ji County, Linfen City, The framework used is a sustainable livelihood framework which is commonly used in the world to study the impact of ecological engineering, and a series of index systems for the evaluation of livelihood status are established. This paper makes a comparative study on the data of Goukou Village (returning farmland to ecological forest) and Checheng Village (returning farmland to Economic Forest) from three aspects of livelihood capital, livelihood strategy and livelihood result, and finds out the difference between them and their respective shortcomings. This paper studies and narrates the expectation of the related policies of the project, and puts forward some relevant suggestions. Finally, the main conclusions are as follows: (1) compared with the natural capital, Goukou village is more abundant than the Checheng village in terms of natural capital, because it is located in the township government, the material capital, human capital and financial capital are better than the Goukou village; There is little difference in social capital. Because of the superior capital condition, Checheng Village has better livelihood strategy and livelihood result than Goukou Village. (2) because of its favorable location and apple industry, Checheng Village needs more labor force. The main sources of income for farmers are agriculture and employment, while the relatively remote Gokoukou village accounts for a large proportion of the agricultural income due to the main planting of corn. (3) the results of farmers' livelihood in the two villages, Checheng Village because of the advantages of capital conditions make its livelihood better than the Goukou Village. Whether it is the poverty rate of the returning farmers or the poverty rate of the non-returning farmers, the poverty rate of the rural households in Checheng Village is lower than that in the Goukou Village. (4) the vast majority of farmers in the two villages are willing to maintain the existing achievements in returning farmland to forests. And are not very satisfied with the duration of state subsidies and funding, hope to increase this support in the future. Finally, in view of the deficiency of returning farmland to forest in the two villages, the corresponding suggestions are put forward in order to improve the practical significance for the development of related policies in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F326.27;F323.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙鋒;朱一非;許媛媛;;甘肅城郊、山區(qū)農(nóng)戶可持續(xù)生計(jì)比較分析[J];西北人口;2015年03期

2 謝芳婷;徐定德;張繼飛;楊勇;;基于退耕還林政策的農(nóng)戶生計(jì)變化及其影響因素[J];貴州農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2015年04期

3 尹錦珊;;退耕還林對(duì)農(nóng)戶可持續(xù)生計(jì)的影響[J];農(nóng)業(yè)與技術(shù);2015年07期

4 謝新彩;;退耕還林對(duì)農(nóng)戶可持續(xù)生計(jì)的影響分析[J];南方農(nóng)業(yè);2015年09期

5 李鴻江;;退耕還林對(duì)農(nóng)戶可持續(xù)生計(jì)的影響[J];現(xiàn)代園藝;2015年04期

6 李雪萍;王蒙;;多維貧困“行動(dòng)—結(jié)構(gòu)”分析框架下的生計(jì)脆弱——基于武陵山區(qū)的實(shí)證調(diào)查與理論分析[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期

7 韓克松;;退耕還林對(duì)農(nóng)戶可持續(xù)生計(jì)的影響探討[J];綠色科技;2014年02期

8 李金香;龔曉德;夏淑琴;李鴻雁;;退耕還林對(duì)農(nóng)戶可持續(xù)生計(jì)能力的影響——基于寧夏鹽池縣農(nóng)戶的調(diào)查[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2013年03期

9 郭歡歡;李波;于海躍;郝麗霞;;退耕還林工程對(duì)農(nóng)戶生產(chǎn)生活影響研究[J];中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境;2011年12期

10 唐麗霞;李小云;左停;;社會(huì)排斥、脆弱性和可持續(xù)生計(jì):貧困的三種分析框架及比較[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 馬海壽;當(dāng)代新疆昌吉地區(qū)回族生計(jì)方式變遷研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2010年

2 李斌;生態(tài)家園富民工程“三位一體”項(xiàng)目對(duì)寧夏鹽池縣農(nóng)戶生計(jì)影響的研究[D];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 崔嘉文;密云水庫(kù)上游地區(qū)生態(tài)補(bǔ)償對(duì)農(nóng)戶生計(jì)影響的研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

2 古帆;連片貧困地區(qū)生計(jì)問題與協(xié)同發(fā)展研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2013年

3 唐軻;可持續(xù)生計(jì)框架下退耕還林對(duì)農(nóng)戶生計(jì)影響研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2013年

4 張麗;生態(tài)補(bǔ)償對(duì)農(nóng)戶生計(jì)的影響[D];西北師范大學(xué);2012年

5 郭紅霞;參與式社區(qū)共管地區(qū)農(nóng)戶生計(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2010年

6 趙函;失地農(nóng)民可持續(xù)生計(jì)的制度建設(shè)研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2010年

7 信桂新;農(nóng)戶生計(jì)變化與社會(huì)主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)[D];西南大學(xué);2009年

8 馮茹;資源利用方式與社區(qū)生計(jì)問題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2009年

9 蘇娟;貴州省退耕還林地區(qū)農(nóng)戶生計(jì)研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2126850