本文選題：國(guó)際氣候談判 + 話語權(quán)�。� 參考：《東北林業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年博士論文

【摘要】：為應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化而開展的國(guó)際氣候談判,充滿了以國(guó)家生存權(quán)和發(fā)展權(quán)為核心的利益之爭(zhēng)。由于林業(yè)在減緩和適應(yīng)人類氣候變化中發(fā)揮的重要作用,林業(yè)議題已成為國(guó)際氣候談判的重要話語內(nèi)容。中國(guó)要想在國(guó)際涉林氣候談判中維護(hù)自己的發(fā)展權(quán)益和國(guó)家利益,就必須提升中國(guó)的林業(yè)話語權(quán)。盡管國(guó)內(nèi)多數(shù)文獻(xiàn)探討了話語權(quán)的內(nèi)涵,分析了林業(yè)在應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化中的重要作用,但將國(guó)際氣候談判、話語權(quán)與中國(guó)林業(yè)三者相結(jié)合論述的文獻(xiàn)較少。本文以林業(yè)話語權(quán)為關(guān)鍵性概念,深入分析了國(guó)際氣候談判視域下中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,定量評(píng)價(jià)了中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)的水平,測(cè)度了影響其提升的主要障礙性因素,從林業(yè)話語主體、林業(yè)話語生產(chǎn)、林業(yè)話語質(zhì)量和林業(yè)話語傳播四個(gè)方面提出中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)提升的政策建議,以期為相關(guān)部門決策提供參考依據(jù)。具體來說,本文從理論、實(shí)證、政策三個(gè)層面展開研究。理論層面：首先,界定了林業(yè)話語權(quán)的概念及特征,為林業(yè)政治學(xué)理論的構(gòu)建奠定了基礎(chǔ)。本文認(rèn)為林業(yè)話語權(quán)是林業(yè)話語主體在話語生產(chǎn)和話語傳播中所具有的價(jià)值觀念貢獻(xiàn)力、議程控制力和政治影響力。這種影響力和支配力具有軟權(quán)力的性質(zhì)。這一概念及特征的界定,為林業(yè)研究提供了新的話語權(quán)視角。用政治學(xué)中的權(quán)力理論、國(guó)家利益理論等分析林業(yè)問題,為林業(yè)政治學(xué)理論構(gòu)建奠定了基礎(chǔ)。其次,嘗試構(gòu)建了中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。針對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)界對(duì)權(quán)力或話語權(quán)定性描述多,定量測(cè)量少,且“軟權(quán)力效果的測(cè)量沒有系統(tǒng)的指標(biāo)體系”這一情況,本文在查閱國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),并結(jié)合林業(yè)領(lǐng)域、國(guó)際政治領(lǐng)域相關(guān)專家意見的基礎(chǔ)上,嘗試構(gòu)建了中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。該指標(biāo)體系由林業(yè)話語主體、林業(yè)話語生產(chǎn)、林業(yè)話語質(zhì)量和林業(yè)話語傳播4個(gè)準(zhǔn)則層,13個(gè)因子層和41個(gè)觀測(cè)點(diǎn)組成。中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建,為定量評(píng)價(jià)中國(guó)在國(guó)際涉林氣候談判中的影響力提供了分析工具。實(shí)證層面：首先,系統(tǒng)梳理了中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀�！堵�(lián)合國(guó)氣候變化框架公約》誕生階段,中國(guó)在規(guī)則制定、議題設(shè)置方面介入程度很低,話語微弱；《京都議定書》談判及批準(zhǔn)階段,主動(dòng)性和開放性增強(qiáng),但參與氣候談判的主體較單一,談判中的議題設(shè)置、議程控制、規(guī)則制定和解釋力等比較有限；后京都?xì)夂蛘勁须A段,中國(guó)主動(dòng)提出議題,通過多邊合作、多角度傳播中國(guó)的話語,話語權(quán)開始增強(qiáng)。其次,定量評(píng)價(jià)了中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)的水平,并測(cè)度了影響其提升的主要障礙性因素。本文從林業(yè)話語主體、林業(yè)話語生產(chǎn)、林業(yè)話語質(zhì)量、林業(yè)話語傳播四個(gè)維度對(duì)中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)進(jìn)行了定量評(píng)價(jià),結(jié)果顯示目前中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)總體上處于一般偏弱水平。為找到影響中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)訴求實(shí)現(xiàn)的障礙性因素,本文選取了九個(gè)障礙性因素,定量測(cè)度了各主要因素與中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)提升之間的相關(guān)性。結(jié)果表明,國(guó)際話語霸權(quán)環(huán)境、林業(yè)議題設(shè)置能力和林業(yè)話語質(zhì)量是影響中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)提升的三個(gè)關(guān)鍵性因素。研究不僅從定量角度描述了中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)的水平,為有針對(duì)性地提出對(duì)策建議提供了依據(jù),也進(jìn)一步拓展了話語權(quán)乃至權(quán)力的定量研究思路。政策層面：在理論和實(shí)證研究的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)提升的主要政策建議。本文認(rèn)為：林業(yè)話語主體的政治影響力是獲得林業(yè)話語權(quán)的前提；在國(guó)際氣候談判視域下,林業(yè)話語權(quán)爭(zhēng)奪的核心是經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域的話語權(quán)；提高林業(yè)話語生產(chǎn)能力的關(guān)鍵在于增強(qiáng)林業(yè)話語主體的議題設(shè)置和議程控制能力；增強(qiáng)價(jià)值觀念貢獻(xiàn)力和構(gòu)建林業(yè)對(duì)外傳播機(jī)制是提高林業(yè)話語質(zhì)量和話語傳播能力的重要手段�；诖�,結(jié)合實(shí)證分析結(jié)果,本文有針對(duì)性地提出了增強(qiáng)林業(yè)話語主體的政治影響力、積極拓展林業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域話語權(quán)、增強(qiáng)林業(yè)議題設(shè)置及議程控制力提升林業(yè)話語生產(chǎn)能力、增強(qiáng)價(jià)值觀念貢獻(xiàn)力提升林業(yè)話語質(zhì)量、構(gòu)建林業(yè)對(duì)外傳播機(jī)制改善林業(yè)話語傳播能力等政策建議。
[Abstract]:International climate negotiations in response to climate change are full of the interests of the nation's right to survival and development. As forestry plays an important role in slowing and adapting to human climate change, forestry has become an important discourse in international climate negotiations. China wants to maintain the international climate negotiations on forest related climate negotiations. Our own rights and interests of development and national interests must improve China's forestry discourse power. Although most of the documents in China have discussed the connotation of the right of discourse and analyzed the important role of forestry in coping with climate change, there are few literature to discuss the international climate negotiations, the right of discourse and the Chinese forestry three. The key concept, in depth analysis of the current situation of the development of Chinese forestry discourse right under the view of international climate negotiations, quantified the level of Chinese forestry discourse right, measured the main obstacle factors affecting its promotion, and put forward the Chinese forest from four aspects: the subject of forestry discourse, the production of forestry discourse, the quality of forestry discourse and the dissemination of forestry discourse. The policy suggestions for the promotion of the discourse power of the industry in order to provide reference for the decision-making of the relevant departments. In particular, this article from three aspects of theory, demonstration and policy. First, the concept and characteristics of the forestry discourse right are defined, which lays the foundation for the construction of the theory of forestry political science. The role of the discourse subject in the discourse production and discourse transmission, the power of the agenda and the political influence. This influence and the power of power have the nature of soft power. The definition of this concept and characteristics provides a new perspective of discourse right for forestry research. The theory of power in politics and the theory of national interests are divided into the theory of political science and the theory of national interests. The analysis of forestry issues has laid a foundation for the construction of the theory of forestry politics. Secondly, it tries to establish an index system for the evaluation of the right to discourse in China's forestry. Guan Wenxian, on the basis of relevant experts' opinions in the field of forestry and international politics, tried to construct the evaluation index system of Chinese forestry discourse right. The index system is composed of 4 criteria layer, 13 factor layer and 41 observation points for forestry discourse main body, forestry discourse production, forestry discourse quality and forestry discourse. The construction of the evaluation index system provides an analytical tool for quantitative evaluation of China's influence in the international negotiation of forest climate negotiations. First, it systematically combs the status of the development of Chinese forestry discourse power. Words are weak; < Kyoto Protocol > negotiation and approval stage, initiative and openness, but a relatively single participant in climate negotiations, negotiation issues, agenda control, rule making and explanatory power; after the Kyoto climate negotiations, Chinese owners move on issues and multilateralism spread China through multilateral cooperation. Discourse, discourse power began to strengthen. Secondly, it quantitatively evaluated the level of Chinese forestry discourse right, and measured the main obstacle factors affecting its promotion. This paper quantitatively evaluated the discourse power of forestry industry in China from the four dimensions of forestry discourse subject, forestry discourse production, forestry discourse quality and forestry discourse transmission. The results show that the present medium is in the middle of China. In order to find the obstacle factors affecting the realization of Chinese forestry discourse power, this paper selects nine obstacles to measure the correlation between the main factors and the promotion of Chinese forestry discourse right. The result shows that the environment of international discourse hegemony and the setting ability of forestry issues. And the quality of forestry discourse is the three key factor affecting the promotion of Chinese forestry discourse power. The study not only describes the level of Chinese forestry discourse right from a quantitative point of view, provides a basis for the proposed countermeasures and suggestions, and further expands the thinking of the quantitative research on the right of discourse and even the power. On the basis of the study, this paper puts forward the main policy suggestions for the promotion of Chinese forestry discourse power. This article holds that the political influence of the subject of forestry discourse is the prerequisite for obtaining the discourse right of forestry; in the view of international climate negotiations, the core of the contention of the power of forestry discourse is the discourse power in the economic field, and the key to improving the production capacity of forestry discourse is in the context of international climate negotiations. It is an important means to strengthen the subject setting and the agenda control ability of the subject of forestry discourse, to enhance the contribution of the value concept and to build the foreign communication mechanism of forestry is an important means to improve the quality of forestry discourse and the ability of discourse communication. We should actively expand the discourse power in the field of forestry economy, strengthen the setting of forestry issues and the control of the agenda, enhance the capacity of forestry discourse production, enhance the contribution of the value concept to improve the quality of forestry discourse, and build the policy suggestions of forestry foreign communication mechanism to improve the communication ability of forestry discourse.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北林業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F326.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王青松;曹玉昆;;氣候談判視域下中國(guó)林業(yè)話語權(quán)的提升途徑[J];世界農(nóng)業(yè);2013年03期

2 郝新鴻;蔡仲;;IPCC與哥本哈根氣候大會(huì)——中國(guó)要爭(zhēng)取科學(xué)話語權(quán)[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2011年01期

3 胡宗山;;政治學(xué)視角下的國(guó)際氣候合作與中國(guó)氣候外交新對(duì)策[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2010年05期

4 張昕宇;;“碳關(guān)稅”的國(guó)際政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)解析——碳政治理念下的國(guó)家利益博弈[J];前沿;2010年16期

5 嚴(yán)雙伍;肖蘭蘭;;中國(guó)參與國(guó)際氣候談判的立場(chǎng)演變[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2010年01期

6 馮廣藝;;生態(tài)文明建設(shè)與語言生態(tài)變異論[J];中南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

7 馮惠玲;胡百精;;北京奧運(yùn)會(huì)與文化中國(guó)國(guó)家形象構(gòu)建[J];中國(guó)人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

8 張海濱;;中國(guó)與國(guó)際氣候變化談判[J];國(guó)際政治研究;2007年01期

9 邵鋒;國(guó)際氣候談判中的國(guó)家利益與中國(guó)的方略[J];國(guó)際問題研究;2005年04期

10 吳一敏;解讀西方發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的話語霸權(quán)[J];南京政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 施箐;貨幣權(quán)力研究[D];上海外國(guó)語大學(xué);2014年

2 王明;基于發(fā)展能力模糊評(píng)價(jià)的知識(shí)型城市發(fā)展路徑研究[D];中國(guó)科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué);2013年

3 張文磊;基于國(guó)家利益分析的國(guó)際碳減排合作研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

4 李慧明;生態(tài)現(xiàn)代化與氣候談判[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

5 吳瑛;中國(guó)話語權(quán)生產(chǎn)機(jī)制研究[D];上海外國(guó)語大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2107783