明清地權(quán)契約中“業(yè)”的表述與田骨田皮的“業(yè)權(quán)”屬性
本文選題:明清時(shí)期 + 地權(quán)契約; 參考:《南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年05期
【摘要】:明清時(shí)期田骨田皮分離是永佃關(guān)系或者說(shuō)永佃制進(jìn)一步發(fā)展的結(jié)果。就權(quán)利范疇與屬性來(lái)說(shuō),田皮與使用權(quán)、經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)、永佃、永佃權(quán)存在交集,但實(shí)際并不相同。在土地"王有"觀念支配下,田骨田皮分離無(wú)論是針對(duì)國(guó)家所有權(quán)作進(jìn)一步分割,還是針對(duì)私人所有權(quán)作進(jìn)一步分割,其終極所有權(quán)依然歸屬國(guó)家。受"王有"觀念的影響,人們并不總是關(guān)注于土地的"所有""占有",而更多關(guān)注的是基于土地的"收益",是為了獲得這一收益而力求享有的合法經(jīng)營(yíng)的權(quán)利——"業(yè)權(quán)",這在明清地權(quán)契約中有著更為明顯的體現(xiàn)。業(yè)權(quán)固然是多重權(quán)利的組合,但卻彰顯著濃厚的傳統(tǒng)文化觀念,即強(qiáng)調(diào)對(duì)土地的經(jīng)營(yíng)與收益權(quán)利,而并非對(duì)土地的所有、占有權(quán)利,相對(duì)于現(xiàn)代所有權(quán)概念,"業(yè)權(quán)"更能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)對(duì)田骨田皮權(quán)利范疇與屬性的表達(dá)。
[Abstract]:The separation of farmland and skin in Ming and Qing dynasties was the result of the further development of permanent tenancy relationship or permanent tenancy system. As far as the category and attribute of right are concerned, there exists intersection of right of use, right of management and right of permanent tenancy, but it is not the same. Under the domination of the concept of "Wang you", the ultimate ownership of land is still owned by the state, whether it is for the further division of the state ownership or for the private ownership. Influenced by the concept of "Wang you", People do not always pay attention to the "all" possession "of land, but pay more attention to the" income "based on the land, which is the legal right to operate in order to obtain this income -" title ", which was the title deed in the Ming and Qing dynasties. There is a more obvious manifestation in the covenant. Although the title is a combination of multiple rights, it shows a strong traditional cultural concept, that is, emphasizing the right to land management and income, not the ownership of the land, the right to occupy it. Compared with the modern concept of ownership, the title can express the category and attribute of the right.
【作者單位】: 南京郵電大學(xué)馬克思主義學(xué)院;
【基金】:教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究青年基金項(xiàng)目“明清田骨田皮分離制度研究”(12YJCZH277) 南京郵電大學(xué)引進(jìn)人才科研啟動(dòng)基金項(xiàng)目“制度與形式:中國(guó)古代地權(quán)分離淵源研究”(NYS212004)
【分類號(hào)】:F329;K248
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 楊周;永佃權(quán)試探[J];浙江師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1988年02期
2 張少筠;慈鴻飛;;清至新中國(guó)建立初期政府永佃權(quán)政策的演變——以國(guó)家和福建地方互動(dòng)為中心的考察[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)史;2011年01期
3 周榮;永佃權(quán)與清代農(nóng)民生活[J];史學(xué)月刊;2002年04期
4 吳量愷;清代的農(nóng)民永佃權(quán)及其影響[J];江漢論壇;1984年06期
5 楊國(guó)楨;論中國(guó)永佃權(quán)的基本特征[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究;1988年02期
6 王聰聰;;基于永佃權(quán)的清代國(guó)家法與習(xí)慣法之比較[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年02期
7 卞利;;江西地區(qū)永佃權(quán)產(chǎn)生的時(shí)間問(wèn)題考辨[J];江西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1989年03期
8 ;永佃權(quán)[J];黃山學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期
,本文編號(hào):2035587
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2035587.html