本文選題：傳統(tǒng)村落 + 旅游開發(fā)�。� 參考：《大理大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：旅游已成為當(dāng)今社會(huì)人們生活中重要的活動(dòng)之一,而由大都市向偏遠(yuǎn)地方進(jìn)行旅游活動(dòng)的趨勢(shì)已非常明顯。如今偏遠(yuǎn)地區(qū)的傳統(tǒng)村落游日益成為熱點(diǎn),本文抓住云南大理環(huán)洱海地區(qū)具有“高原湖泊生態(tài)脆弱區(qū)、民族文化多元融合區(qū)、鄉(xiāng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展活躍區(qū)”等多重特征的典型區(qū)域,來分析傳統(tǒng)村落旅游開發(fā)的狀況,在評(píng)價(jià)傳統(tǒng)村落旅游開發(fā)狀況的基礎(chǔ)上,分析不同類型村落的不同旅游開發(fā)模式,研究不同旅游旅游開發(fā)模式的得失,探求傳統(tǒng)村落旅游開發(fā)的合理模式。全文由四部分組成,第一部分是緒論,首先從三個(gè)方面提出了論文的研究背景、研究目的和意義、國(guó)內(nèi)外傳統(tǒng)村落旅游開發(fā)研究綜述,在此基礎(chǔ)上引出了本文的研究?jī)?nèi)容、研究方法和創(chuàng)新之處以及基本概念和理論基礎(chǔ)。第二部分闡述了國(guó)內(nèi)外傳統(tǒng)村落旅游開發(fā)典型案例,從而引出第三章內(nèi)容;第三部分是主要研究環(huán)洱海傳統(tǒng)村落旅游開發(fā)主要模式,選取喜洲村、雙廊村和龍下登村為典型村落來進(jìn)行比較研究,又分別從運(yùn)營(yíng)方式、開發(fā)效益、適宜性三方面方面對(duì)三種旅游開發(fā)模式進(jìn)行分析比較,在此基礎(chǔ)上評(píng)價(jià)分析不同旅游開發(fā)模式的優(yōu)劣性;第四部分是結(jié)合上述第二部分理論基礎(chǔ),對(duì)環(huán)洱海傳統(tǒng)村落合理旅游開發(fā)模式進(jìn)行思考:思考合理旅游開發(fā)模式應(yīng)遵循的基本原則、最后針對(duì)現(xiàn)存的旅游開發(fā)模式不足之處以及旅游開發(fā)模式的選擇和構(gòu)建提出相應(yīng)的對(duì)策和建議,并對(duì)文章做整體總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, tourism has become one of the most important activities in people's life, and the trend of tourism from big cities to remote places is very obvious. Nowadays, traditional village tours in remote areas are becoming more and more popular. This paper focuses on the typical areas with many characteristics such as the fragile ecological area of plateau and lake, the multi-fusion area of ethnic culture and the active area of rural economic development in Huaner Lake area of Dali, Yunnan Province. To analyze the status of tourism development in traditional villages, on the basis of evaluating the status of tourism development in traditional villages, to analyze the different tourism development models of different types of villages, and to study the gains and losses of different tourism development modes. To explore the reasonable mode of traditional village tourism development. The paper is composed of four parts. The first part is the introduction. Firstly, the research background, purpose and significance of the paper are put forward, and the domestic and foreign traditional village tourism development research is summarized. On this basis, the research content of this paper is drawn out. Research methods and innovations as well as basic concepts and theoretical basis. The second part elaborated the domestic and foreign traditional village tourism development typical case, thus leads to the third chapter content; the third part is mainly studies the ring Erhai traditional village tourism development main pattern, selects the Xizhou village, Shuanglang Village and Longxiaden Village are the typical villages to carry on the comparative research, and analyze and compare the three kinds of tourism development models from the aspects of operation mode, development benefit and suitability, respectively. On this basis, it evaluates and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of different tourism development models. The fourth part is based on the theoretical basis of the second part. The rational tourism development mode of the traditional village in Huaner Lake is considered: the basic principles that should be followed in the rational tourism development mode, At last, the author puts forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for the deficiency of the existing tourism development mode and the choice and construction of the tourism development mode, and summarizes the whole article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大理大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F592.7;F327

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊榮彬;車震宇;李汝恒;;社區(qū)居民視角下鄉(xiāng)村旅游發(fā)展模式比較研究——以環(huán)洱海地區(qū)喜洲、雙廊為例[J];農(nóng)業(yè)現(xiàn)代化研究;2015年06期

2 唐曉云;;古村落旅游社會(huì)文化影響:居民感知、態(tài)度與行為的關(guān)系——以廣西龍脊平安寨為例[J];人文地理;2015年01期

3 李斌;;傳統(tǒng)村落旅游經(jīng)濟(jì)的認(rèn)識(shí)與開發(fā)——基于嶼北村與光復(fù)鄉(xiāng)的比較[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2014年17期

4 周乾松;;新型城鎮(zhèn)化過程中加強(qiáng)傳統(tǒng)村落保護(hù)與發(fā)展的思考[J];長(zhǎng)白學(xué)刊;2013年05期

5 "加快公共文化服務(wù)體系建設(shè)研究"課題組;吳理財(cái);;城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程中傳統(tǒng)村落的保護(hù)與發(fā)展研究——基于中西部五省的實(shí)證調(diào)查[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2013年04期

6 程乾;郭靜靜;;基于類型的古村落旅游競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2011年07期

7 吳文智;趙磊;;我國(guó)古村鎮(zhèn)旅游研究進(jìn)展[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2010年11期

8 魏峰群;;傳統(tǒng)古村落保護(hù)與旅游開發(fā)的混合效應(yīng)模式研究[J];干旱區(qū)資源與環(huán)境;2010年10期

9 章海英;;基于相關(guān)利益主體的古村落旅游開發(fā)模式探討[J];水利天地;2010年09期

10 馬少春;何朝華;;環(huán)洱海地區(qū)鄉(xiāng)村非農(nóng)化發(fā)展研究[J];保山學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張小輝;海南省新農(nóng)村建設(shè)背景下傳統(tǒng)村落的保護(hù)與整治規(guī)劃研究[D];海南大學(xué);2013年

2 朱孟超;旅游資源非優(yōu)區(qū)旅游開發(fā)研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1988895