本文選題：大英縣 + 失地農(nóng)民　； 參考：《電子科技大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著城市化進程的加快,農(nóng)村集體土地被大量征用,眾多農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)化為城市居民,失地農(nóng)民的安置問題已成為城市化進程中面臨的重要問題。大英縣城市建設(shè)經(jīng)歷了由建縣初2平方公里的農(nóng)業(yè)小鎮(zhèn)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)?012年城市面積13平方公里的中等城鎮(zhèn),城市居民由2萬余人達到目前的12萬人。在城市化快速發(fā)展的同時,大量城郊農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)槌鞘芯用?縣級政府在征地拆遷、住房安置等方面做了大量工作,積累了較多的經(jīng)驗和教訓(xùn)。本文通過對大英縣建縣16年以來在推進舊城改造、新城拓展,以及建設(shè)工業(yè)園區(qū)、中國死海旅游區(qū)等過程中政府對失地農(nóng)民住房保障工作所采取的模式、建設(shè)的效果和群眾的感受作典型性對比分析,逐一剖析不同安置模式存在的優(yōu)劣和可資借鑒的經(jīng)驗,最后探討在新的發(fā)展階段如何更好地實現(xiàn)城市快速發(fā)展與保障改善民生實現(xiàn)同步推進。文章通過相關(guān)理論研究探討了如何在新時期更好地遵循市場經(jīng)濟規(guī)律,科學(xué)確定被征地農(nóng)民的土地及房產(chǎn)價值,切實保護被征地農(nóng)民的合法權(quán)益。通過對已建成拆遷安置小區(qū)的對比分析,總結(jié)在拆遷安置過程中不同模式的優(yōu)點和不足,并采取居民問卷調(diào)查的形式分析被安置群眾對安置模式的滿意程度。通過對比分析,文章提出目前大英縣征地拆遷和安置房建設(shè)中存在群眾較高期望值與遵循市場規(guī)律,資金和土地緊缺與安置量增大,規(guī)劃執(zhí)行缺位與提升城市品質(zhì),政策執(zhí)行不統(tǒng)一與拆遷壓力增大等4個主要矛盾。最后,文章就完善安置房建設(shè)工作給予了相關(guān)政策建議,主要包括:1,提升城市規(guī)劃水平,增強規(guī)劃執(zhí)行剛性;2,提升綜合保障水平,維護群眾合法權(quán)益。3,完善安置工作舉措,健全住房保障機制。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of urbanization, rural collective land has been expropriated in large numbers, many farmers have been transformed into urban residents, and the resettlement of land-lost farmers has become an important problem in the process of urbanization. The urban construction of Daying County has changed from a small agricultural town of 2 square kilometers at the beginning of the county to a medium town with an area of 13 square kilometers in 2012. The number of urban residents has reached 120000 from more than 20, 000 to the present. With the rapid development of urbanization, a large number of suburban farmers have turned into urban residents, and the county government has done a lot of work in land acquisition and demolition, housing resettlement and so on, and has accumulated more experience and lessons. In this paper, in the course of promoting the transformation of the old city, the expansion of the new city, and the construction of the industrial park and the China Dead Sea tourist area, the government has adopted the mode of housing security for the landless peasants since the construction of the county in Daying County for 16 years. The effects of construction and the feelings of the masses are compared and analyzed one by one, and the advantages and disadvantages of different resettlement models and the experience that can be used for reference are analyzed one by one. Finally, it discusses how to better realize the rapid development of the city and guarantee the improvement of people's livelihood in the new stage of development. This paper discusses how to follow the law of market economy better in the new period, scientifically determine the land and real estate value of the peasants who have been expropriated, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the peasants who have been expropriated through the relevant theoretical research. Based on the comparative analysis of the completed resettlement community, this paper summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of different models in the process of resettlement, and analyzes the satisfaction of the resettled people with the resettlement model by means of questionnaire survey. Through comparative analysis, the paper points out that there are high expectations of the masses and follow the market law in the current land requisition and relocation and housing construction in Daying County, the funds and land shortage and the increase of the resettlement quantity, the lack of implementation of the plan and the improvement of the quality of the city. There are four main contradictions between the inconsistent implementation of the policy and the increase of the demolition pressure. Finally, the article gives relevant policy suggestions on improving the construction of resettlement houses, mainly including: 1, raising the level of urban planning, enhancing the rigidity of planning execution, raising the level of comprehensive security, safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the masses, and perfecting the measures of resettlement work. We will improve the housing security mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：電子科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F323.6;F301.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 俞孔堅,李迪華,韓西麗;論“反規(guī)劃”[J];城市規(guī)劃;2005年09期

2 倪峰;;博弈論視角的城市拆遷問題分析[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年01期

3 岳子成;;我國公共政策執(zhí)行偏差的主體因素分析及對策研究[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2009年02期

，

本文編號：1958197