本文選題：產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移 + 協(xié)同發(fā)展��； 參考：《中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展在地理區(qū)位、自然環(huán)境、經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模、科技創(chuàng)新、勞動(dòng)力資源等領(lǐng)域具有較好的優(yōu)勢。京津冀區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)劃總是走走停停,實(shí)際效果不大,目前的合作水平和力度遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)落后于長三角和珠三角地區(qū)。京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展的出發(fā)點(diǎn)是北京功能疏解和非首都核心功能轉(zhuǎn)移,津冀兩地借力發(fā)展。通過京津冀以及全國經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)中三次產(chǎn)業(yè)占比的分析比較,發(fā)現(xiàn)北京市第二產(chǎn)業(yè)在國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值中占比已經(jīng)遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)低于第三產(chǎn)業(yè)占比,并且持續(xù)下降,產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移對(duì)于北京市經(jīng)濟(jì)增長影響不大,可整理出更多的居住空間、建設(shè)用地資源,為北京的發(fā)展提供空間保障。本文數(shù)據(jù)通過實(shí)地調(diào)研和公開資料收集,對(duì)京津冀地區(qū)國土部門進(jìn)行走訪,了解最新協(xié)同發(fā)展動(dòng)態(tài),考察天津、河北多個(gè)開發(fā)園區(qū),了解到園區(qū)土地利用效率低下、盲目擴(kuò)張,同時(shí)長期面臨建設(shè)用地指標(biāo)不足等矛盾問題,通過對(duì)比分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)土地利用集約節(jié)約度低、土地批而未供問題嚴(yán)重、后備土地資源匱乏等情況,承接產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移應(yīng)優(yōu)先利用低效的開發(fā)園區(qū)建設(shè)用地、保護(hù)寶貴的耕地資源、充分發(fā)揮批而未供土地的利用。構(gòu)建偏離-份額模型,得到各相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)對(duì)北京經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的貢獻(xiàn)度、競爭效率值,篩選出產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移行業(yè)類別。津冀兩地在承接產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移項(xiàng)目上存在競爭關(guān)系,通過兩地產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)比、工業(yè)集聚度分析、園區(qū)集約節(jié)約用地評(píng)價(jià)等多個(gè)環(huán)節(jié),綜合比較篩選出了天津武清、西青、東麗、寶坻四個(gè)區(qū),以及河北保定、廊坊、唐山三市分別承接北京市不同行業(yè)的搬遷轉(zhuǎn)移工作,提出重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目的搬遷建議。耕地面積大量減少、建設(shè)用地指標(biāo)不足、生態(tài)保護(hù)任務(wù)艱巨、土地違法問題突出等難題,客觀上要求三地著眼于京津冀區(qū)域一體化發(fā)展大局,實(shí)行嚴(yán)格保護(hù)耕地原則下產(chǎn)業(yè)功能劃分,堅(jiān)持占補(bǔ)平衡政策不放松的前提下允許部分地區(qū)跨地區(qū)指標(biāo)交易,傾斜照顧產(chǎn)業(yè)承接地區(qū)核減耕地保有量指標(biāo)分配,存量挖潛提高園區(qū)土地集約節(jié)約度,并按照國家新型城鎮(zhèn)發(fā)展要求,重點(diǎn)推進(jìn)規(guī)劃修改、規(guī)劃銜接,實(shí)現(xiàn)多規(guī)合一,助力京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei have good advantages in geographical location, natural environment, economic scale, scientific and technological innovation, labor resources and so on. The regional economic planning of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region always stops, but the actual effect is not so good. The present cooperation level and intensity lag far behind the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. The starting point of the coordinated development of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei is the function of Beijing and the transfer of non-capital core function, and the development of Tianjin and Hebei. Through the analysis and comparison of the proportion of the three industries in the economic structure of Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei and the whole country, it is found that the proportion of the secondary industry in the GDP of Beijing is far lower than that of the tertiary industry, and it continues to decline. The industrial transfer has little effect on Beijing's economic growth, so it can sort out more living space, construct land resources and provide space guarantee for the development of Beijing. Through field research and public data collection, this paper visits the land departments of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region to find out the latest coordinated development trends, and investigates Tianjin and many development parks in Hebei Province, and finds out that the land use efficiency of the parks is low and the land use is blindly expanding. At the same time, for a long time faced with contradictions such as insufficient construction land indicators, through comparative analysis, it is found that the land use intensive saving degree is low, the problem of land grant but not supply is serious, the reserve land resources are scarce and so on. To undertake industrial transfer, priority should be given to the use of construction land of inefficient development parks, the protection of valuable cultivated land resources, and the full use of grants but not available land. Based on the model of deviation-share, the contribution degree and competitive efficiency of the related industries to Beijing's economic development are obtained, and the industry categories of industrial transfer are screened out. There is a competitive relationship between Tianjin and Hebei in undertaking industrial transfer projects. Through the comparison of industrial structure between the two places, the analysis of industrial concentration degree, and the evaluation of intensive land conservation in the park, the Tianjin Wuqing, Xiqing, and Dongli are selected by comprehensive comparison. Baodi four districts, as well as Hebei Baoding, Langfang, Tangshan three cities to undertake the relocation of different industries in Beijing, proposed relocation proposals for key projects. The large reduction of cultivated land area, the lack of indicators for construction land, the arduous task of ecological protection, the outstanding problems of land violations, and so on, objectively require the three places to focus on the overall situation of regional integration development in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. Under the principle of strict protection of cultivated land, the industrial function should be divided, and on the premise that the policy of balance between occupation and compensation should not be relaxed, some regions should be allowed to trade indicators across regions, and the industry should be inclined to take care of the industry to undertake a reduction in the quota distribution of cultivated land holdings. In order to improve the intensive saving degree of land in the park, and in accordance with the requirements of the development of new cities and towns of the country, it is necessary to promote the planning modification, plan convergence, realize the integration of multiple rules and regulations, and promote the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F301.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 顧湘;;產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)演進(jìn)對(duì)土地利用的影響研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2011年18期

2 劉彥隨,陳百明;中國可持續(xù)發(fā)展問題與土地利用/覆被變化研究[J];地理研究;2002年03期

3 袁志剛,范劍勇;1978年以來中國的工業(yè)化進(jìn)程及其地區(qū)差異分析[J];管理世界;2003年07期

4 付聰;;淺談集約節(jié)約用地[J];科技創(chuàng)新與應(yīng)用;2014年14期

5 Minmin HUO;Zhongxiang YU;;Land Use in Ma'anshan Economic and Technological Development Zone: Based on the Land Survey of Typical Enterprises[J];Asian Agricultural Research;2014年03期

6 Cui Xianghua;Li Min;;Separating Citizenization and Land Requisition: New Urbanization in Beijing's Rural-Urban Fringe Area[J];China City Planning Review;2015年01期

7 鄭健;;加快鐵路建設(shè),助推京津冀交通一體化[J];城市軌道交通研究;2014年06期

8 張淑蓮;;基于合作博弈的京津冀區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)作研究[J];河北師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

9 戴宏偉,馬麗慧;借勢與造勢——京津冀產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度轉(zhuǎn)移與河北產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2002年18期

10 李亮;張聰;但文紅;;貴州省優(yōu)勢工業(yè)演進(jìn)研究——基于偏離份額模型的實(shí)證分析[J];綿陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1828759