本文選題：土地流轉(zhuǎn) + 中介組織　； 參考：《南京大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：中共十七屆三中全會(huì)《關(guān)于推進(jìn)農(nóng)村改革發(fā)展若干重大問題的決定》(以下簡稱《決定》)確立積極鼓勵(lì)土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的政策�！稕Q定》對(duì)土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)、土地流轉(zhuǎn)、耕地面積等問題進(jìn)行規(guī)范,并首次提出選定試驗(yàn)區(qū)域,開展土地流轉(zhuǎn)試點(diǎn)工作,積累土地流轉(zhuǎn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)�！稕Q定》在全國貫徹實(shí)施后,農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)市場呈現(xiàn)出一派蓬勃發(fā)展的景象。隨著《決定》精神的貫徹落實(shí),農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)利好政策深入人心,土地流轉(zhuǎn)規(guī)模逐漸擴(kuò)大,發(fā)展速度日益加快,流轉(zhuǎn)對(duì)象和利益關(guān)系也從單一向多元化發(fā)展。在土地流轉(zhuǎn)實(shí)施過程中,多種形式的土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織開始孕育與發(fā)展,成為土地流轉(zhuǎn)市場中不可或缺的構(gòu)成要素。從現(xiàn)有的國內(nèi)外研究成果來看,多數(shù)研究土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的課題,局限于特定的區(qū)域,案例具有特殊性和片面性,從推廣的角度分析,缺乏典型性和代表性；部分學(xué)者對(duì)于農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織當(dāng)前的存在形式過于樂觀,并未充分考慮到中國政治體制和經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的特點(diǎn),在實(shí)際工作中不接地氣,難以操作；對(duì)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的性質(zhì)、運(yùn)營模式、運(yùn)作機(jī)制等方面還缺乏系統(tǒng)、深入、細(xì)致的研究,結(jié)合國內(nèi)外土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)和模式進(jìn)行研究的文章也不多。目前,對(duì)土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的研究,仍處在表淺的層面,實(shí)質(zhì)性的突破不多,可推廣可操作性不強(qiáng)。研究的滯后,嚴(yán)重影響農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的培育和發(fā)展。本文針對(duì)當(dāng)前中國土地流轉(zhuǎn)復(fù)雜的現(xiàn)狀,圍繞土地流轉(zhuǎn)中的利益問題展開研究,對(duì)中國現(xiàn)存的三種土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織模式進(jìn)行比較分析,研究若干發(fā)達(dá)國家土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的成功之道,借鑒其成熟經(jīng)驗(yàn),通過對(duì)眾多資料進(jìn)行梳理和總結(jié),大膽地提出一個(gè)設(shè)想：建立公益性農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織。政府從宏觀層面出發(fā)組織流轉(zhuǎn),其最終目標(biāo)是實(shí)現(xiàn)國家戰(zhàn)略,維護(hù)國家利益；農(nóng)民從個(gè)人利益出發(fā)進(jìn)行交易,其根本目的是維護(hù)自身權(quán)益,過上有保障的生活。土地作為稀缺的國有資源,不能完全由市場決定其用途,必須要服從國家的宏觀調(diào)控和農(nóng)業(yè)布局的總體規(guī)劃。公益性土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的出現(xiàn)可以緩解政府與農(nóng)民之間的矛盾,搭建溝通的橋梁和平臺(tái),最終促成利益的趨同。公益性土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的建立可以解決諸多問題。第一,作為公正的第三方組織,在政府和農(nóng)民之間構(gòu)建平等的對(duì)話平臺(tái),使土地流轉(zhuǎn)雙方之間的利益訴求得以伸張,用市場的杠桿尋求平衡,促進(jìn)社會(huì)公平；第二,公益性農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的介入,有利于協(xié)調(diào)各利益方之間的關(guān)系。在充分保障農(nóng)民利益的同時(shí),確保國家在土地流轉(zhuǎn)中的宏觀戰(zhàn)略得以實(shí)施,最大化地實(shí)現(xiàn)各自的利益；第三,公益性農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織承擔(dān)起其使命,能有利于政府充分發(fā)揮其自身的職能。政府一旦從繁冗瑣碎的協(xié)調(diào)事務(wù)中解放出來,將有更多的時(shí)間和精力用于農(nóng)村發(fā)展大政方針的制定,集中生產(chǎn),形成規(guī)模效應(yīng),促進(jìn)農(nóng)業(yè)的現(xiàn)代化發(fā)展；第四,公益性土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的建立有利于規(guī)范土地交易市場秩序,監(jiān)督管理土地市場,保證土地流轉(zhuǎn)市場沿著健康、有序的方向發(fā)展,同時(shí)促進(jìn)中國城鎮(zhèn)化發(fā)展,達(dá)到城鄉(xiāng)共同繁榮。本文主要運(yùn)用三種方法,對(duì)中國農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織進(jìn)行研究和分析。是比較分析法,分析闡述政府主導(dǎo)的中介組織、市場主導(dǎo)的中介組織和農(nóng)民自發(fā)成立的土地交易組織的優(yōu)劣；通過比較中外土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織的異同,闡述中國農(nóng)村中介組織如何揚(yáng)長避短、洋為中用。二是文獻(xiàn)資料法,通過研究,廣泛收集相關(guān)學(xué)術(shù)文獻(xiàn)、政府公告、法律法規(guī)等,獲取各種研究素材,對(duì)論題進(jìn)行分析闡述。三是案例研究法,通過對(duì)相關(guān)案例的研究分析,增強(qiáng)本研究的實(shí)證性,夯實(shí)其實(shí)踐性與應(yīng)用性。本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于創(chuàng)造性地提出建立“公益性農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織”的構(gòu)想。這樣的組織形式在當(dāng)下中國農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的社會(huì)實(shí)踐中,已經(jīng)具備萌芽發(fā)展的條件,只要政府給予正確的引導(dǎo)和足夠的支持,就一定能夠很快發(fā)展起來。本文也存在許多不足,由于本人理論功底有限,對(duì)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織問題的認(rèn)識(shí)還不夠全面和深刻,資料多數(shù)通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)數(shù)據(jù)庫進(jìn)行收集,實(shí)證研究方面功課做得不足。中國農(nóng)村土地改革是一個(gè)大課題,本文的工作只是在土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織問題研究方面邁出的一小步,需要進(jìn)一步深入研究的問題還很多,例如如何對(duì)公益性農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織定位,公益性農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中介組織自身如何發(fā)展,政府如何監(jiān)管等等。
[Abstract]:In the third Plenary Session of the 17th CPC Central Committee, the policy of actively encouraging the transfer of land contracted management rights was established by the Communist Party of China (hereinafter referred to as < Decision >). < Decision > to standardize the land contract management rights, land circulation, and the area of cultivated land, and first put forward the selected test areas to carry out the land transfer test. With the implementation of the whole country, the rural land circulation market presents a flourishing scene. With the implementation of the spirit, the policy of the rural land transfer is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, the scale of the land circulation is gradually expanding, the speed of development is accelerating, and the relations of circulation objects and interests are also from In the process of land transfer, various forms of land transfer intermediary organizations have begun to develop and develop, and become an indispensable element in the land circulation market. From the existing research results at home and abroad, most of the research projects of land transfer intermediary organizations are limited to specific areas, and the cases have special cases. Special and one-sided, from the perspective of promotion, the lack of typicality and representativeness; some scholars are too optimistic about the current form of rural land transfer intermediary organization, not fully considering the characteristics of China's political system and economic system, it is ungrounded and difficult to operate in the actual work; the intermediary organization of rural land transfer. The nature, operation mode, operation mechanism and other aspects are still lack of systematic, in-depth, meticulous research, combined with the advanced experience and model of land transfer intermediary organizations at home and abroad and research articles are not much. At present, the research on the intermediary organization of land transfer is still in the superficial level, the substantial breakthrough is not much, and the extension of the operability is not strong. The lag of the research seriously affects the cultivation and development of the intermediary organizations of rural land circulation. This paper, aiming at the current situation of the land circulation in China, focuses on the interests of the land circulation, compares and analyses the three existing intermediary organizations of land circulation in China, and studies the intermediary organizations of the land circulation in some developed countries. In the way of success, by drawing on its mature experience, by combing and summarizing a large number of data, the author boldly puts forward a tentative idea: the establishment of a public welfare rural land transfer intermediary organization. The government will organize the circulation from the macro level, and its ultimate goal is to realize the national strategy and safeguard the interests of the country; the peasants carry on the transaction from the personal interests. The fundamental purpose is to maintain its own rights and interests and live a guaranteed life. As a scarce state resource, land can not be completely determined by the market for its use. It must obey the national macro-control and the overall planning of the agricultural layout. The emergence of intermediary organizations for public welfare land transfer can slow down the contradiction between the government and the peasants and build communication. Bridges and platforms eventually lead to the convergence of interests. The establishment of intermediary organizations for public welfare land transfer can solve many problems. First, as a fair third party organization, an equal dialogue platform is built between the government and the peasants, the interests of the two sides of the land transfer are extended, the balance is sought with the leverage of the market, and the society promotes the society. Second, the intervention of the intermediary organization of the public welfare rural land circulation helps to coordinate the relations among all the interests. At the same time, to ensure the interests of the farmers, ensure the implementation of the macro strategy of the state in the land circulation, and maximize their respective interests; third, the intermediary organizations of the public welfare rural land transfer undertake its own. The mission is conducive to the government to give full play to its own functions. Once the government is liberated from the trivial and trivial coordination affairs, the government will have more time and energy for the formulation of the policy of rural development, the concentration of production, the formation of scale effect, and the modernization of agriculture; fourth, the establishment of intermediary organizations for the circulation of public welfare land. It is beneficial to standardize the order of the land trading market, supervise and manage the land market, ensure the development of the land circulation market along a healthy and orderly direction, and promote the development of China's urbanization and achieve the common prosperity of urban and rural areas. This paper mainly uses three methods to study and analyze the intermediary organizations of rural land circulation in China. Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of government dominated intermediary organizations, market dominated intermediary organizations and farmers' spontaneous land trading organizations. By comparing the similarities and differences between Chinese and foreign land transfer intermediary organizations, this paper expounds how China's rural intermediary organizations can promote their strengths and avoid weaknesses, and the two is the literature material law. Through the research, the relevant academic literature is widely collected. Government announcements, laws and regulations and so on, obtain various research materials, analyze the topic. Three is case study method, through the research and analysis of related cases, strengthen the empirical study, tamp the practicality and applicability. The innovation of this article lies in the creation of the creation of "public welfare rural land transfer intermediary organization" In the social practice of rural land circulation in China, this kind of organizational form has the conditions of germination and development. As long as the government gives correct guidance and sufficient support, it will be able to develop quickly. There are also many shortcomings in this paper. Because of my limited theoretical foundation, the intermediary organization problem of rural land circulation is limited. The knowledge is not comprehensive and profound. Most of the data are collected through the network database and the empirical research is not enough. The rural land reform in China is a major issue. The work of this paper is only a small step in the research of the intermediary organization of land circulation, and many problems need further study, for example, for example. How to locate the intermediary organizations of public welfare rural land circulation, how to develop the intermediary organizations of public welfare rural land circulation, how to supervise the government and so on.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F321.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃建平;淺析土地流轉(zhuǎn)和農(nóng)機(jī)化的關(guān)系[J];江西農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2001年06期

2 鄭靜波,肖吉懷;土地流轉(zhuǎn)應(yīng)把握好四個(gè)關(guān)鍵[J];農(nóng)村合作經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)營管理;2001年07期

3 ;正確引導(dǎo)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)[J];農(nóng)村合作經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)營管理;2001年09期

4 何朝暉,楊超龍,譚桂華;土地流轉(zhuǎn)要實(shí)現(xiàn)“三個(gè)突破” 制止“三種行為”[J];農(nóng)村合作經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)營管理;2001年11期

5 何朝暉,楊超龍,譚桂華;土地流轉(zhuǎn)中應(yīng)當(dāng)注意的幾個(gè)問題[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2001年10期

6 陳治華;關(guān)于農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的調(diào)查與思考[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)與技術(shù);2001年11期

7 張成君,王萬江;現(xiàn)階段農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的現(xiàn)狀分析[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2002年04期

8 凌東藩;淺析沈陽市農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)實(shí)踐[J];遼寧農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2002年04期

9 于紅英;淺談土地流轉(zhuǎn)中的問題與對(duì)策[J];現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè);2002年11期

10 汪騰平;破解土地流轉(zhuǎn)中的難題[J];鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)論壇;2002年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 周博文;;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中的社會(huì)穩(wěn)定問題研究[A];科學(xué)發(fā)展·惠及民生——天津市社會(huì)科學(xué)界第八屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)優(yōu)秀論文集（下）[C];2012年

2 ;第五十期 新型農(nóng)村社區(qū)建設(shè)與土地流轉(zhuǎn)實(shí)踐[A];中國智庫經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察（2013年第1輯）[C];2013年

3 黃建軍;;當(dāng)前我國農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中的問題及前景展望[A];全國博士生論壇“現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程中的農(nóng)村與農(nóng)民問題”論文集[C];2012年

4 尹愛飛;王曉東;;基于博弈分析探討土地流轉(zhuǎn)中各主體的流轉(zhuǎn)意愿[A];2009年中國土地學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

5 黃曉平;李建平;黃中茂;;創(chuàng)新財(cái)政投入機(jī)制,推進(jìn)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)[A];中國“三農(nóng)”問題研究與探索：全國財(cái)政支農(nóng)優(yōu)秀論文選（2008）[C];2009年

6 吳閩忠;;淺談城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展中的土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題[A];成渝地區(qū)城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌與區(qū)域合作研討會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

7 詹晨暉;顏崢;;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)意愿度模型的構(gòu)建與應(yīng)用——以重慶市為例[A];自主創(chuàng)新與持續(xù)增長第十一屆中國科協(xié)年會(huì)論文集（3）[C];2009年

8 余愛民;;淺談如何認(rèn)識(shí)和引導(dǎo)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)——以荊州荊門為例[A];首屆湖湘三農(nóng)論壇論文集（上）[C];2008年

9 卿漸偉;;關(guān)于常德市農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的調(diào)查與思考[A];第二屆湖湘三農(nóng)論壇論文集[C];2009年

10 向常水;;論當(dāng)前湖南土地流轉(zhuǎn)存在的問題及對(duì)策[A];第二屆湖湘三農(nóng)論壇論文集[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 廖富洲;在農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中要維護(hù)好農(nóng)民利益[N];中國改革報(bào);2004年

2 ;住農(nóng)家 問三農(nóng) 難點(diǎn)追蹤  關(guān)注農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)[N];福建日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

3 克山縣人民政府代縣長 史耀忠;組建“土地流轉(zhuǎn)銀行”好處多[N];黑龍江經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2005年

4 尋烏縣 汪紅英 嚴(yán)考泉;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)亟待規(guī)范[N];江西日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

5 葛長明;江都市著力規(guī)范農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)[N];揚(yáng)州日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

6 記者 彭華;我市農(nóng)村雇用農(nóng)業(yè)工人成氣候[N];東營日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

7 趙長賓;我市農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)快速發(fā)展[N];萊蕪日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

8 劉曉雷;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)現(xiàn)場會(huì)召開[N];平頂山日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

9 記者 劉永安　實(shí)習(xí)生 侯利平;省政府農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)工作調(diào)研組蒞汴[N];開封日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

10 記者 楊春蓮　通訊員 何啟林;我市召開全市農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)現(xiàn)場會(huì)[N];欽州日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 吳萍;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)：基于現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)范式的理論分析與實(shí)證研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2010年

2 曾超群;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題研究[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

3 謝文;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)金融支持體系研究[D];中南大學(xué);2010年

4 唐文金;農(nóng)戶土地流轉(zhuǎn)意愿與行為研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2008年

5 周金衢;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中農(nóng)民、大戶與國家關(guān)系研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2014年

6 段力妼;農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2011年

7 李淑妍;農(nóng)民工市民化視角下的農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2013年

8 戴偉娟;城市化進(jìn)程中農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題研究[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2010年

9 桂琳;溝域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過程中土地流轉(zhuǎn)路徑研究[D];中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)(北京);2012年

10 孫研;我國土地流轉(zhuǎn)條件下糧作農(nóng)戶經(jīng)營模式研究[D];西北大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 孫海森;諸城土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題研究[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2009年

2 王旭靜;基層政府在農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)中的行為探析[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

3 陶正兵;河南省農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的市場化研究[D];河南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

4 李曉霞;影響我國農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的因素及未來發(fā)展趨勢(shì)研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2012年

5 邵捷;我國農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的政府行為研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2012年

6 朱開波;旺蒼縣農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)研究[D];四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

7 婁亞鵬;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)中的農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題研究[D];長江大學(xué);2013年

8 馬興彬;我國農(nóng)村城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程中土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

9 馬小遐;我國農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)改革的金融支持研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2014年

10 黃忠越;大同市農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)問題研究[D];山西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1826156