本文選題：兩權(quán)市場 + 農(nóng)地配置機(jī)制　； 參考：《農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)》2017年02期

【摘要】：農(nóng)地配置機(jī)制市場化是創(chuàng)新和改革的目標(biāo),農(nóng)地所有者集體組織的主體資格有缺陷是現(xiàn)實(shí)。本文以此為立論基礎(chǔ)和前提,以黨的政策為指針,提出了農(nóng)地"兩權(quán)市場"的概念,在建立"兩權(quán)市場"過程中要對(duì)集體經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行完善或改造,以落實(shí)農(nóng)地產(chǎn)權(quán)使其成為真正的市場主體。同時(shí)分析了農(nóng)地行政配置機(jī)制的弊端,闡述了市場機(jī)制的優(yōu)勢,也提出了建立"兩權(quán)市場’的路徑�？隙�"兩權(quán)市場"和三權(quán)分置是相容的。
[Abstract]:The marketization of farmland allocation mechanism is the goal of innovation and reform. This paper takes this as the basis and premise of the argument, taking the policy of the Party as the guide, puts forward the concept of "two power markets" of farmland, and in the process of establishing "two power markets", it is necessary to perfect or reform the corporate governance structure of collective economic organizations. In order to implement the farmland property right, it becomes the real market main body. At the same time, this paper analyzes the malpractice of the farmland administrative allocation mechanism, expounds the advantages of the market mechanism, and puts forward the way to establish the "two-right market". Affirmed that the "two power market" and the three power division is compatible.
【作者單位】： 遼寧農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)校;
【分類號(hào)】：F321.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 趙娉婷;;農(nóng)村集體建設(shè)用地配置機(jī)制研究——以濰坊市高新區(qū)為例[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2011年07期

2 魏峰;鄭義;劉孚文;;我國農(nóng)村集體建設(shè)用地市場配置機(jī)制研究——以重慶地票制度為例[J];現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)科技;2010年08期

3 程安林;;上市公司會(huì)計(jì)信息披露的配置機(jī)制分析[J];中國管理信息化;2008年02期

4 秋風(fēng);;重構(gòu)資源跨地區(qū)配置機(jī)制[J];中國新聞周刊;2009年38期

5 甘志華;劉，

本文編號(hào)：1787640