本文關(guān)鍵詞： 區(qū)域發(fā)展能力 農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力 東中西部6省差距　出處：《貴州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前,區(qū)域發(fā)展差距及其成因研究已成為學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn),但針對(duì)農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力的研究還處于起步階段,且對(duì)農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力的評(píng)價(jià)大多止步于定性研究。本文通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)理論深入分析,定義農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力的四大維度,認(rèn)為農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力就是農(nóng)村地區(qū)吸引資本、勞動(dòng)力等要素聚集,提高資源配置效率,增強(qiáng)農(nóng)產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,提升生態(tài)環(huán)境承載力的綜合能力體現(xiàn)。本論文在區(qū)域發(fā)展理論和能力理論指導(dǎo)下,參考相關(guān)指標(biāo)體系設(shè)計(jì)方法與評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)內(nèi)容,構(gòu)建區(qū)域發(fā)展能力與農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力兩套評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,采用層次分析法,通過(guò)逐級(jí)加權(quán)合成,得到區(qū)域發(fā)展能力和農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力總指數(shù)。RACDI(Rural Areas Capacity Development Index)選擇的指標(biāo)評(píng)價(jià)內(nèi)容既與RCDI(Reginal Capacity Development Index)保持一致,又側(cè)重體現(xiàn)了農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力的特殊性。本指標(biāo)體系測(cè)算指標(biāo)個(gè)數(shù)適中,指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)獲取難度小,既能較全面的反映農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力的實(shí)際情況,也能減輕指標(biāo)搜集的工作量;總指數(shù)的合成方法簡(jiǎn)單方便,易于掌握。利用本論文構(gòu)建的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系對(duì)東中西6省的RCDI和RACDI進(jìn)行測(cè)算分析,得出結(jié)論。東中西6省RACDI差距明顯,尤其是貴州省的RACDI各年都處于最低水平。RACDI分項(xiàng)能力中除產(chǎn)品競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力個(gè)別年份變化較大外,要素聚集能力、資源分配率和生態(tài)環(huán)境承載力的波動(dòng)較為平緩。江蘇省的RCDI高于其他5省,但其RACDI并不表現(xiàn)出同等的優(yōu)勢(shì),而貴州省的RACDI處于最低水平,但RCDI也不處于絕對(duì)的劣勢(shì)。這說(shuō)明區(qū)域發(fā)展能力強(qiáng)的地區(qū),其農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力并不一定就強(qiáng);相反,農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力弱的地區(qū),其區(qū)域發(fā)展能力也不一定就弱于其他地區(qū),農(nóng)村發(fā)展能力與區(qū)域發(fā)展能力并不是同等同向變化的。
[Abstract]:At present, the research on regional development gap and its causes has become the focus of academic attention, but the research on rural development ability is still in its infancy. And the evaluation of rural development ability mostly stops at qualitative research. Through in-depth analysis of relevant theories, this paper defines four dimensions of rural development ability, and concludes that rural development ability is the accumulation of capital and labor force in rural areas. Under the guidance of regional development theory and ability theory, this paper refers to the design method of relevant index system and the content of evaluation index, under the guidance of regional development theory and ability theory, and improve the efficiency of resource allocation, enhance the market competitiveness of agricultural products, and enhance the comprehensive ability of carrying capacity of ecological environment. Constructing two sets of evaluation index system of regional development ability and rural development ability, adopting analytic hierarchy process, through step by step weight synthesis, The evaluation contents of regional development capacity and rural Areas Capacity Development index are consistent with that of RCDI(Reginal Capacity Development index, but also embody the particularity of rural development ability. The number of indexes measured in this index system is moderate. The difficulty of obtaining index data is small, which can not only reflect the actual situation of rural development ability more comprehensively, but also reduce the workload of index collection; the synthesis method of total index is simple and convenient. It is easy to master. Using the evaluation index system constructed in this paper, the RCDI and RACDI of the six provinces of East and West are calculated and analyzed, and the conclusion is drawn that the RACDI gap between East and West provinces is obvious. Especially in Guizhou province, the ability of RACDI in each year is at the lowest level. The RCDI of Jiangsu Province is higher than that of the other five provinces, but its RACDI does not show the same advantage, while the RACDI of Guizhou Province is at the lowest level. However, RCDI is not at an absolute disadvantage. This shows that the rural development capacity of the regions with strong regional development capacity is not necessarily strong; on the contrary, the regional development capacity of the regions with weak rural development capacity is not necessarily weaker than that of other regions. Rural development capacity and regional development capacity are not the same direction change.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F323

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王進(jìn);王禮力;龐新江;;我國(guó)農(nóng)村區(qū)域競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系及實(shí)證分析[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

2 楊忍;劉彥隨;劉玉;;新時(shí)期中國(guó)農(nóng)村發(fā)展動(dòng)態(tài)與區(qū)域差異格局[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2011年10期

3 楊科;;論農(nóng)村貧困人口的自我發(fā)展能力[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年04期

4 邵建平;蘇小敏;張永;;西部自我發(fā)展能力提升對(duì)策研究——基于比較優(yōu)勢(shì)承接?xùn)|部產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的視角[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2012年06期

5 王國(guó)升;陳源泉;高旺盛;;區(qū)域農(nóng)村發(fā)展差距成因評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)資源與區(qū)劃;2007年05期

6 郭存芝;凌亢;白先春;胡振宇;梅小平;;城市可持續(xù)發(fā)展能力及其影響因素的實(shí)證[J];中國(guó)人口·資源與環(huán)境;2010年03期

7 杜志雄;;中國(guó)農(nóng)村區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及趨勢(shì)[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì);1992年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉慧;[N];中國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)導(dǎo)報(bào);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1525338