本文關(guān)鍵詞：城市規(guī)劃區(qū)農(nóng)用地征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究　出處：《云南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 城市規(guī)劃區(qū) 農(nóng)用地征收 補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)

【摘要】：土地問題是當(dāng)前中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和城市化進(jìn)程中最重要的問題之一。城市化進(jìn)程加快帶來的建設(shè)用地需求增加和我國(guó)土地用途管理制度,催生了土地問題中最為關(guān)鍵的征地問題,即國(guó)家征收集體土地,并將其用途變?yōu)榻ㄔO(shè)用地。由于近年來建設(shè)用地緊缺和其價(jià)格的飛速上漲,征地矛盾開始頻頻出現(xiàn),其中最主要的矛盾集中在征地補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)上。 當(dāng)前中國(guó)征地補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)均采用“統(tǒng)一年產(chǎn)值倍數(shù)法”和“區(qū)片綜合地價(jià)法”兩種方式來確定。這兩類補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)均是建立在“土地年產(chǎn)值”這一基礎(chǔ)上的,并用此來計(jì)算對(duì)被征地農(nóng)民的補(bǔ)償�；凇巴恋啬戤a(chǎn)值”基礎(chǔ)的補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)僅僅考慮到了土地的當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值,對(duì)土地的預(yù)期經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值、社會(huì)保障價(jià)值、生態(tài)價(jià)值和增值均不能體現(xiàn),導(dǎo)致了當(dāng)前征地補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)補(bǔ)償范圍過窄和補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)過低等問題,使得被征地農(nóng)民獲得的補(bǔ)償普遍偏低,無(wú)法保障其根本利益和長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展,從而引起農(nóng)戶與政府的沖突。特別是對(duì)城市規(guī)劃區(qū)中農(nóng)用地的征收,由于農(nóng)地已經(jīng)增值,現(xiàn)行的補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)無(wú)法維護(hù)農(nóng)民的利益,此區(qū)域會(huì)比純農(nóng)業(yè)區(qū)矛盾更加尖銳。 黨的十八屆三中全會(huì)明確提出了“保障農(nóng)民公平分享土地增值收益”的觀點(diǎn),在這一背景下,本文以土地增值收益為切入點(diǎn),引入“土地發(fā)展權(quán)”的理論,并將土地發(fā)展權(quán)價(jià)值具體細(xì)分為“農(nóng)地發(fā)展權(quán)價(jià)值”和“市地發(fā)展權(quán)價(jià)值”,論證了“農(nóng)地發(fā)展權(quán)價(jià)值歸農(nóng)民,市地發(fā)展權(quán)價(jià)值歸國(guó)家”的這一觀點(diǎn)。因此,本文在這一理論基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建了基于土地發(fā)展權(quán)的農(nóng)用地征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn),將農(nóng)用地價(jià)值細(xì)分為農(nóng)用地經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值、社會(huì)價(jià)值、生態(tài)價(jià)值、土地發(fā)展權(quán)價(jià)值四個(gè)部分,通過理論分析得出了在征地過程中,農(nóng)地不同類別價(jià)值的分配。 在這一新的補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)框架下,本文選取四川省南充市順慶區(qū)的A地塊征地案例對(duì)新舊補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了實(shí)例對(duì)比分析。分析發(fā)現(xiàn),在新舊補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)下,農(nóng)地經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差異較小,但新的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)在計(jì)算農(nóng)地經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值時(shí)更加適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢(shì)的變化；舊標(biāo)準(zhǔn)未考慮農(nóng)民的土地發(fā)展權(quán)價(jià)值,農(nóng)民獲得的補(bǔ)償僅占到土地總收益的6%,新的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)考慮了農(nóng)地發(fā)展權(quán)價(jià)值,農(nóng)民獲得的補(bǔ)償占土地總收益的25%；從結(jié)果看來,新的補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)下農(nóng)民能夠得到的補(bǔ)償是舊標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的3.6倍。新標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有利于提高在農(nóng)地征收行為中農(nóng)民的獲得的補(bǔ)償,有利于保障農(nóng)民的生活的長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展,維護(hù)好農(nóng)民的切身利益,同時(shí)符合征地收益在國(guó)家、集體和個(gè)人中合理分配這一指導(dǎo)思想。
[Abstract]:Land problem is one of the most important problems in the process of economic development and urbanization in China. The most critical land expropriation problem is the expropriation of collective land by the state and the conversion of its use into construction land. Due to the shortage of construction land and the rapid increase of its price in recent years. The contradiction of land expropriation began to appear frequently, and the most important contradiction was focused on the standard of compensation for land requisition. At present, the compensation standards of land requisition in China are determined by "unified annual output value multiple method" and "district comprehensive land price method". Both of these two compensation standards are based on the "land annual output value". The compensation standard based on "annual output value of land" only takes into account the current economic value of land, the expected economic value of land and the value of social security. Ecological value and value-added can not be reflected, leading to the current land requisition compensation standard compensation range is too narrow and compensation standards are too low, so that the farmers who have been expropriated the compensation is generally low. It can not guarantee its fundamental interests and long-term development, thus causing conflicts between farmers and the government, especially the expropriation of agricultural land in urban planning areas, because the agricultural land has already increased in value. The current compensation standard can not protect the interests of farmers, this area will be more acute than pure agricultural areas. The third Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee clearly put forward the viewpoint of "ensuring the peasants to share the land value-added income equitably". Under this background, this paper introduces the theory of "land development right" with the land value-added income as the starting point. The value of land development right is subdivided into "value of farmland development right" and "value of city land development right", which proves that the value of farmland development right belongs to farmers and the value of city land development right belongs to state. On the basis of this theory, this paper constructs the compensation standard of agricultural land expropriation based on land development right, and subdivides the value of agricultural land into four parts: economic value, social value, ecological value and value of land development right. Through theoretical analysis, the distribution of different types of farmland value in the process of land expropriation is obtained. Under the framework of this new compensation standard, this paper selects a land expropriation case of Shunqing District, Nanchong City, Sichuan Province, and makes a comparative analysis of the old and new compensation standards. The analysis shows that under the new and old compensation standards. The difference of the compensation standard of farmland economic value is small, but the new standard is more suitable for the change of economic situation in the calculation of farmland economic value. The old standard does not take into account the value of farmers' land development rights, the compensation received by farmers only accounts for 6% of the total income of land, the new standard considers the value of agricultural land development rights, and the compensation received by farmers accounts for 25% of the total income of land; According to the results, the farmers can get 3.6 times more compensation under the new compensation standard than the old standard. The new standard is helpful to improve the compensation of farmers in the behavior of farmland expropriation. It is beneficial to ensure the long-term development of farmers' life, safeguard the vital interests of farmers, and accord with the guiding ideology of rational distribution of land expropriation proceeds among the state, collectives and individuals.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F321.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王德起;;城市化進(jìn)程中土地增值機(jī)制的理論探析[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2010年04期

2 畢忠德;王士君;朱光明;周樂;;城市化過程中的土地增值研究——以長(zhǎng)春市為例[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2011年04期

3 李燕茹,胡兆量;城市土地增值的動(dòng)力機(jī)制與調(diào)控[J];城市問題;2000年03期

4 閆文;許月明;;河北省多樣化征地補(bǔ)償方式探析[J];調(diào)研世界;2010年03期

5 肖屹,郭玉燕;對(duì)土地征用中外部性的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)思考[J];國(guó)土資源科技管理;2005年04期

6 王萬(wàn)茂;臧俊梅;;試析農(nóng)地發(fā)展權(quán)的歸屬問題[J];國(guó)土資源科技管理;2006年03期

7 王熒;;農(nóng)地非農(nóng)化過程中的農(nóng)民土地權(quán)益分析[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年S1期

8 張玉陽(yáng);;城市化背景下我國(guó)征地補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的實(shí)證研究——以重慶市為例[J];廣東農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2012年04期

9 譚術(shù)魁;肖建英;;農(nóng)民征地補(bǔ)償滿意度實(shí)證研究[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2012年02期

10 劉靈輝;;農(nóng)村土地內(nèi)部產(chǎn)權(quán)關(guān)系解構(gòu)下的征地補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[J];國(guó)土資源科技管理;2012年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1436981