基于金融危機(jī)史的會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-17 19:22
【摘要】：1637年荷蘭郁金香狂熱使人們首次嘗到投機(jī)泡沫所帶來(lái)的災(zāi)難；1720年發(fā)生在英國(guó)的南海泡沫，讓人們充分意識(shí)到會(huì)計(jì)信息真實(shí)性的重要性，由此帶來(lái)審計(jì)的萌芽與發(fā)展；1929年大蕭條，促使“公認(rèn)會(huì)計(jì)原則”的誕生；2008年金融危機(jī)引發(fā)公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)的爭(zhēng)論，G20確立建立高質(zhì)量全球統(tǒng)一會(huì)計(jì)體系的目標(biāo)。正如前財(cái)政部副部長(zhǎng)王軍所言：縱觀歷史，每一次重大金融危機(jī)都是一部會(huì)計(jì)反思史、再造史和創(chuàng)新史。本文即選取金融危機(jī)史的視角，研究會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的變遷。 本文采用規(guī)范研究方法。首先，通過(guò)對(duì)歷史上八次重大金融危機(jī)進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要回顧，并分析其各自對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷產(chǎn)生的影響，在此基礎(chǔ)之上，總結(jié)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷的一般規(guī)律，為全文奠定研究基礎(chǔ)。然后，本文運(yùn)用馬克思主義哲學(xué)中的歷史分析法，將會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則技術(shù)性和社會(huì)性兩大屬性之間的關(guān)系，同生產(chǎn)力與生產(chǎn)關(guān)系的矛盾運(yùn)動(dòng)相結(jié)合，闡述金融危機(jī)引起會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷根源的外生性特征；同時(shí)，透過(guò)現(xiàn)象看本質(zhì)，運(yùn)用演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)自組織理論，從前提、動(dòng)力和路徑等方面，全面、系統(tǒng)地研究金融危機(jī)引起會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷根源的內(nèi)生性本質(zhì)。最后，根據(jù)前文研究基礎(chǔ)與結(jié)論，總結(jié)金融危機(jī)對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則發(fā)展的幾點(diǎn)啟示。 本文基于金融危機(jī)史的新視角，研究會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷，取得了一定的研究成果，得出以下研究結(jié)論：①會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷的趨勢(shì)是國(guó)際趨同，變遷的核心是保障會(huì)計(jì)信息的可靠性；②金融危機(jī)引起會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷的根源，外生性特征表現(xiàn)為社會(huì)性拉動(dòng)技術(shù)性的變遷模式，理論上表現(xiàn)為生產(chǎn)關(guān)系影響和反作用于生產(chǎn)力的情形；③金融危機(jī)引起會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷的根源，由其內(nèi)生性本質(zhì)所決定，即在特定環(huán)境作用下會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則自組織演化過(guò)程的一種變遷，，金融危機(jī)引起會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷也可以看作，會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則自組織演化理論一個(gè)有力的客觀歷史佐證。 據(jù)前文研究成果，金融危機(jī)對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則發(fā)展具有一定的啟示意義：金融危機(jī)引起會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷是會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則自組織演化過(guò)程的外在表現(xiàn)，具有客觀性和歷史必然性。開(kāi)放性較高的會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則系統(tǒng)，在其社會(huì)性的強(qiáng)大需求和拉動(dòng)下，準(zhǔn)則作為技術(shù)性很強(qiáng)的理論系統(tǒng)而不斷走向科學(xué)，會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則對(duì)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的推動(dòng)效率也就越高。盡管在金融危機(jī)下，準(zhǔn)則的社會(huì)性表現(xiàn)得更加強(qiáng)勢(shì)和突出，但應(yīng)堅(jiān)持其客觀、公正的技術(shù)性這一本質(zhì)屬性，逐漸使會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則滯后性向前瞻性、科學(xué)性和靈活性轉(zhuǎn)變，最大限度減少會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則給經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展帶來(lái)的負(fù)面效應(yīng)，使會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則更好地服務(wù)于社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)。
[Abstract]:The Dutch tulip frenzy in 1637 made people taste the disaster caused by speculative bubble for the first time; the South China Sea bubble that occurred in Britain in 1720 made people fully aware of the importance of accounting information authenticity, which brought about the germination and development of audit; the Great Depression of 1929 promoted the birth of GAAP; the 2008 financial crisis triggered the debate of fair value accounting, and the G20 established the goal of establishing a high-quality global unified accounting system. As Wang Jun, a former deputy finance minister, put it: throughout history, every major financial crisis is a history of accounting reflection, reconstruction and innovation. This paper selects the perspective of the history of financial crisis to study the changes of accounting standards. In this paper, the normative research method is adopted. First of all, through a brief review of the eight major financial crises in history, and analysis of their respective impact on the changes of accounting standards, on this basis, summarize the general laws of changes in accounting standards, and lay a research foundation for the full text. Then, by using the historical analysis method in Marxist philosophy, this paper combines the relationship between the technical and social attributes of accounting standards with the contradictory movement of productive forces and production relations, and expounds the exogenous characteristics of the root causes of the changes of accounting standards caused by the financial crisis. At the same time, through the phenomenon to look at the essence, the use of evolutionary economics self-organization theory, from the premise, motivation and path, a comprehensive and systematic study of the financial crisis caused by the accounting standards change root of the intrinsic essence. Finally, according to the above research basis and conclusion, this paper summarizes some enlightenments of the financial crisis to the development of accounting standards. Based on the new perspective of the history of financial crisis, this paper studies the changes of accounting standards, and obtains some research results. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) the trend of accounting standards changes is international convergence, and the core of the changes is to ensure the reliability of accounting information; (2) the root of the change of accounting standards caused by the financial crisis, the exogenous characteristics are the change mode of social pull technology, and in theory, it is the influence of production relations and the situation of counteracting on productive forces. (3) the root of the change of accounting standards caused by the financial crisis is determined by its intrinsic nature, that is, a change in the process of self-organization evolution of accounting standards under the action of a specific environment, and the changes of accounting standards caused by the financial crisis can also be regarded as a powerful objective historical evidence of the theory of self-organization evolution of accounting standards. According to the previous research results, the financial crisis has certain enlightenment significance to the development of accounting standards: the change of accounting standards caused by financial crisis is the external manifestation of the process of self-organization evolution of accounting standards, which has objectivity and historical necessity. The accounting standard system with high openness, under the strong demand and pull of its sociality, as a highly technical theoretical system, continues to move towards science, and the higher the efficiency of the accounting standards to promote the social economy. Although under the financial crisis, the social performance of standards is more strong and prominent, but we should adhere to its objective and fair technical attribute, gradually change the lag of accounting standards to forward-looking, scientific and flexible, minimize the negative effects of accounting standards on economic development, and make accounting standards better serve the social economy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F233;F831.59
本文編號(hào)：2501206
[Abstract]:The Dutch tulip frenzy in 1637 made people taste the disaster caused by speculative bubble for the first time; the South China Sea bubble that occurred in Britain in 1720 made people fully aware of the importance of accounting information authenticity, which brought about the germination and development of audit; the Great Depression of 1929 promoted the birth of GAAP; the 2008 financial crisis triggered the debate of fair value accounting, and the G20 established the goal of establishing a high-quality global unified accounting system. As Wang Jun, a former deputy finance minister, put it: throughout history, every major financial crisis is a history of accounting reflection, reconstruction and innovation. This paper selects the perspective of the history of financial crisis to study the changes of accounting standards. In this paper, the normative research method is adopted. First of all, through a brief review of the eight major financial crises in history, and analysis of their respective impact on the changes of accounting standards, on this basis, summarize the general laws of changes in accounting standards, and lay a research foundation for the full text. Then, by using the historical analysis method in Marxist philosophy, this paper combines the relationship between the technical and social attributes of accounting standards with the contradictory movement of productive forces and production relations, and expounds the exogenous characteristics of the root causes of the changes of accounting standards caused by the financial crisis. At the same time, through the phenomenon to look at the essence, the use of evolutionary economics self-organization theory, from the premise, motivation and path, a comprehensive and systematic study of the financial crisis caused by the accounting standards change root of the intrinsic essence. Finally, according to the above research basis and conclusion, this paper summarizes some enlightenments of the financial crisis to the development of accounting standards. Based on the new perspective of the history of financial crisis, this paper studies the changes of accounting standards, and obtains some research results. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) the trend of accounting standards changes is international convergence, and the core of the changes is to ensure the reliability of accounting information; (2) the root of the change of accounting standards caused by the financial crisis, the exogenous characteristics are the change mode of social pull technology, and in theory, it is the influence of production relations and the situation of counteracting on productive forces. (3) the root of the change of accounting standards caused by the financial crisis is determined by its intrinsic nature, that is, a change in the process of self-organization evolution of accounting standards under the action of a specific environment, and the changes of accounting standards caused by the financial crisis can also be regarded as a powerful objective historical evidence of the theory of self-organization evolution of accounting standards. According to the previous research results, the financial crisis has certain enlightenment significance to the development of accounting standards: the change of accounting standards caused by financial crisis is the external manifestation of the process of self-organization evolution of accounting standards, which has objectivity and historical necessity. The accounting standard system with high openness, under the strong demand and pull of its sociality, as a highly technical theoretical system, continues to move towards science, and the higher the efficiency of the accounting standards to promote the social economy. Although under the financial crisis, the social performance of standards is more strong and prominent, but we should adhere to its objective and fair technical attribute, gradually change the lag of accounting standards to forward-looking, scientific and flexible, minimize the negative effects of accounting standards on economic development, and make accounting standards better serve the social economy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F233;F831.59
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉玉廷;;我國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則國(guó)際趨同走向縱深發(fā)展階段——《中國(guó)企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則與國(guó)際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)告準(zhǔn)則持續(xù)趨同路線圖》解讀[J];財(cái)務(wù)與會(huì)計(jì);2010年06期
2 邢樹(shù)東;孫志梅;;會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則:公共選擇理論的一個(gè)實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年08期
3 葛家澍;杜興強(qiáng);;會(huì)計(jì)信息、公司治理與會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則：理論分析、博弈解釋與歷史證據(jù)[J];當(dāng)代會(huì)計(jì)評(píng)論;2008年01期
4 陳志英;美國(guó)處理儲(chǔ)貸協(xié)會(huì)危機(jī)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)及借鑒[J];南方金融;2001年04期
5 閆大波;姜力巖;;分析會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷的自組織演化機(jī)理研究[J];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年12期
6 保羅·米爾格羅姆,約翰·羅伯特,吳素萍;美國(guó)的儲(chǔ)貸危機(jī)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;1998年03期
7 李寧;;基于游說(shuō)的會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2007年20期
8 雷光勇,陳瓊香;交易費(fèi)用、納什均衡與會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);1999年04期
9 郭書(shū)江;論經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)、金融危機(jī)的形成原因與遏制[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2004年01期
10 杜靜然;馬旭東;;基于自組織理論金融工具會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷的研究[J];中國(guó)注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師;2012年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 杜靜然;基于演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論的會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷研究[D];天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年
2 高利芳;基于趨同的會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷與會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則執(zhí)行研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年
本文編號(hào)：2501206
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/kuaiji/2501206.html
最近更新
教材專著
