【摘要】：近年來(lái),隨著反腐敗工作的深入開(kāi)展,依法嚴(yán)懲貪污、賄賂等腐敗犯罪已經(jīng)成為常態(tài)。特別是黨的十八大以來(lái),我國(guó)的反腐敗斗爭(zhēng)進(jìn)入攻堅(jiān)階段,其力度之大、難度之大前所未有。據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì),黨的十八大以來(lái),落馬的省部級(jí)以上官員就有100多名,其中多數(shù)涉及貪污、賄賂、濫用職權(quán)等職務(wù)犯罪。貪污、賄賂等職務(wù)犯罪嚴(yán)重侵犯了國(guó)家工作人員職務(wù)行為的廉潔性,損害了黨和國(guó)家的形象和聲譽(yù),擾亂了正常的市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序,給國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)發(fā)展帶來(lái)巨大危害。尤其是最近幾年,貪污、賄賂犯罪日益智能化、復(fù)雜化、隱蔽化,呈現(xiàn)出許多新的特點(diǎn),檢察機(jī)關(guān)查辦貪污、賄賂犯罪案件的難度越來(lái)越大。如何有效打擊貪污、賄賂犯罪是擺在檢察機(jī)關(guān)面前的一大難題。為適應(yīng)反腐敗工作的需要,更加有效地打擊貪污、賄賂等職務(wù)犯罪,檢察機(jī)關(guān)通過(guò)不斷探索、實(shí)踐,在綜合調(diào)研的基礎(chǔ)上,設(shè)置了檢察機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部司法會(huì)計(jì)技術(shù)門(mén)類(lèi),并選配司法會(huì)計(jì)專(zhuān)業(yè)技術(shù)人員,開(kāi)展司法會(huì)計(jì)相關(guān)工作,為查辦貪污、賄賂等職務(wù)犯罪案件提供司法會(huì)計(jì)技術(shù)與司法鑒定意見(jiàn)證據(jù)支持。我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)的司法會(huì)計(jì)工作已開(kāi)展近30年,雖然司法會(huì)計(jì)在查辦貪污、賄賂犯罪案件中發(fā)揮了重要作用,但是在具體的實(shí)踐應(yīng)用中仍存在不少問(wèn)題,尤其是司法會(huì)計(jì)在打擊貪污、賄賂等職務(wù)犯罪中所發(fā)揮的作用與當(dāng)前日益復(fù)雜的反腐敗斗爭(zhēng)形勢(shì)還有一定差距,比如偵查實(shí)踐中司法會(huì)計(jì)的應(yīng)用還不普遍,偵查人員的司法會(huì)計(jì)知識(shí)匱乏,仍存在“自偵自鑒”、“自檢自鑒”情況,以及司法會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)科本身還不成體系,司法會(huì)計(jì)教育與實(shí)踐脫節(jié)等。因此,對(duì)司法會(huì)計(jì)在貪污、賄賂犯罪案件偵查中的應(yīng)用進(jìn)行專(zhuān)門(mén)、系統(tǒng)研究,以理論研究指導(dǎo)偵查實(shí)踐工作具有十分重要意義。本文旨在通過(guò)研究司法會(huì)計(jì)在貪污、賄賂犯罪案件偵查中的應(yīng)用,來(lái)指導(dǎo)貪污、賄賂犯罪案件偵查工作。本文共三萬(wàn)余字,由三個(gè)部分組成。第一部分是司法會(huì)計(jì)概述。首先從司法會(huì)計(jì)的產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀入手,闡述司法會(huì)計(jì)理論研究的情況,提出司法會(huì)計(jì)的概念,其次闡述司法會(huì)計(jì)活動(dòng)的類(lèi)型,最后對(duì)司法會(huì)計(jì)與會(huì)計(jì)、審計(jì)、法務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了比較分析。第二部分是貪污、賄賂犯罪的特點(diǎn)及偵查,首先提出貪污、賄賂犯罪的概念,其次闡述貪污、賄賂犯罪的特點(diǎn),最后對(duì)貪污、賄賂犯罪案件偵查進(jìn)行了分析。第三部分是司法會(huì)計(jì)在貪污、賄賂犯罪案件偵查中的應(yīng)用。首先闡述了司法會(huì)計(jì)檢查在貪污、賄賂犯罪案件偵查中的應(yīng)用,包括司法會(huì)計(jì)檢查的作用、具體范圍、基本方法,以及司法會(huì)計(jì)檢查在貪污、賄賂犯罪案件偵查中的具體應(yīng)用。其次,著重分析司法會(huì)計(jì)鑒定在貪污、賄賂犯罪案件偵查中的應(yīng)用,包括司法會(huì)計(jì)鑒定的主要作用、鑒定范圍、啟動(dòng)程序、基本方法,以及司法會(huì)計(jì)鑒定意見(jiàn)的審查。最后,對(duì)當(dāng)前司法會(huì)計(jì)存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了探討。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the deepening of anti-corruption work, it has become the norm to punish corruption, bribery and other corruption crimes in accordance with the law. Especially since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the anti-corruption struggle of our country has entered the critical stage, its strength is so great, the difficulty is unprecedented. According to statistics, since the 18th CPC National Congress, there have been more than 100 officials at or above the provincial and ministerial levels, most of whom are involved in corruption, bribery, abuse of power, and other official crimes. Corruption, bribery and other duty crimes have seriously violated the integrity of state functionaries, damaged the image and reputation of the party and the state, disrupted the normal market economic order, and brought great harm to the economic and social development of the country. Especially in recent years, the crime of corruption and bribery has become more and more intelligent, complicated and concealed, showing many new features. It is more and more difficult for procuratorial organs to investigate and handle corruption and bribery crimes. How to effectively combat corruption, bribery crime is a big problem in front of procuratorial organs. In order to meet the needs of anti-corruption work and fight corruption and bribery more effectively, through constant exploration and practice, on the basis of comprehensive investigation, the procuratorial organs have set up the technical categories of internal judicial accounting of the procuratorial organs. And select the professional and technical personnel of judicial accounting to carry out the related work of judicial accounting to provide forensic accounting technology and evidence support for the investigation and handling of corruption bribery and other job crimes. The judicial accounting work of procuratorial organs in our country has been carried out for nearly 30 years. Although judicial accounting has played an important role in investigating and handling corruption and bribery crimes, there are still many problems in the practical application of judicial accounting. In particular, the role of judicial accounting in combating corruption, bribery and other professional crimes still has a certain gap with the current increasingly complex situation of anti-corruption struggle, for example, the application of judicial accounting in the practice of investigation is not universal. The lack of judicial accounting knowledge of investigators, there are still "self-investigation self-learning", "self-examination self-reference" situation, as well as the discipline of judicial accounting itself is not systematic, judicial accounting education and practice, and so on. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the application of judicial accounting in the investigation of embezzlement and bribery crimes, and to guide the investigation practice with the theoretical research. The purpose of this paper is to guide the investigation of corruption and bribery by studying the application of judicial accounting in the investigation of corruption and bribery crimes. There are more than 30,000 words in this paper, which are composed of three parts. The first part is an overview of judicial accounting. Starting with the present situation of the emergence and development of judicial accounting, this paper expounds the research situation of judicial accounting theory, puts forward the concept of judicial accounting, then expounds the types of judicial accounting activities, and finally discusses the judicial accounting and accounting, auditing, and so on. The relationship of forensic accounting is compared and analyzed. The second part is the characteristics and investigation of corruption and bribery crime. Firstly, the concept of corruption and bribery crime is put forward. Secondly, the characteristics of corruption and bribery crime are expounded. Finally, the investigation of corruption and bribery crime is analyzed. The third part is the application of judicial accounting in the investigation of corruption and bribery crimes. Firstly, this paper expounds the application of judicial accounting inspection in the investigation of corruption and bribery crime cases, including the function, specific scope, basic methods, and the specific application of judicial accounting inspection in the investigation of corruption and bribery crime cases. Secondly, it focuses on the application of forensic accounting expertise in the investigation of corruption and bribery crimes, including the main role of forensic accounting expertise, the scope of forensic accounting, the initiation procedure, the basic methods, and the examination of forensic accounting expert opinions. Finally, the existing problems of judicial accounting are discussed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D918.95;D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 龐建兵;我國(guó)司法會(huì)計(jì)的現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2001年02期

2 喬星歌;淺析司法會(huì)計(jì)的偵查與鑒定在訴訟活動(dòng)中的作用[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2002年01期

3 林惠成;偵破重大經(jīng)濟(jì)案件的幕后戲——記當(dāng)好公檢法配角的上海司法會(huì)計(jì)中心[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2002年02期

4 季艷明,陳平;司法會(huì)計(jì)工作現(xiàn)狀及解決的途徑[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2003年04期

5 楊斯邁,楊蒼;司法會(huì)計(jì)及其在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中的適用[J];中國(guó)司法鑒定;2003年04期

6 吳迅;司法會(huì)計(jì)教學(xué)中存在問(wèn)題芻議[J];云南警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

7 潘惠敏;論司法會(huì)計(jì)運(yùn)行環(huán)境的創(chuàng)建[J];政法學(xué)刊;2004年04期

8 楊崇勤;淺談司法會(huì)計(jì)在預(yù)防職務(wù)犯罪中的重要作用[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2004年06期

9 王秀麗;界限與勾連:“司法”視野下的中國(guó)司法會(huì)計(jì)[J];新疆財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

10 趙毅;目前我國(guó)司法會(huì)計(jì)存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2005年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)記者 袁妖;搭起司法與會(huì)計(jì)的橋梁[N];財(cái)會(huì)信報(bào);2005年

2 張勝利　張一龍 張申生;鄭州：司法會(huì)計(jì)8年查處違法違紀(jì)資金近億[N];工人日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

3 本報(bào)記者 李若凡;司法會(huì)計(jì)：不可忽視的反腐力量[N];河南日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

4 本報(bào)記者 張馮焱　通訊員 張勝利;走向偵查前沿的司法會(huì)計(jì)[N];鄭州日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

5 楊國(guó)恩 河南省登封市人民檢察院;運(yùn)用司法會(huì)計(jì)提前介入偵查機(jī)制 促進(jìn)自偵辦案工作又好又快發(fā)展[N];西部時(shí)報(bào);2011年

6 郭濤 周明俊;司法會(huì)計(jì)：從賬本中搜集犯罪證據(jù)[N];中國(guó)稅務(wù)報(bào);2005年

7 陳辛江;檢察司法會(huì)計(jì)介入重大工程[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

8 葛東升 高永祥;應(yīng)充分發(fā)揮司法會(huì)計(jì)在檢察工作中的作用[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

9 陳樹(shù)國(guó);司法會(huì)計(jì)工作如何幫助辦案[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

10 本報(bào)通訊員 芮東生　記者 盧志堅(jiān) 本報(bào)記者 湯維駿 岳紅革 周澤春 張有成 通訊員 李笑冰 鄔蘭 王天潤(rùn);司法會(huì)計(jì)解數(shù)字謎團(tuán)[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李寧;刑事訴訟視野下的司法會(huì)計(jì)制度研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2008年

2 蔡賽容;我國(guó)司法會(huì)計(jì)發(fā)展中存在的主要問(wèn)題探討[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

3 江典鍵;反貪偵查中司法會(huì)計(jì)技術(shù)應(yīng)用研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

4 沈吟秋;關(guān)于構(gòu)建我國(guó)司法會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

5 朱靚;我國(guó)司法會(huì)計(jì)過(guò)度借鑒審計(jì)問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

6 楊振強(qiáng);論司法會(huì)計(jì)在職務(wù)犯罪偵查中的運(yùn)用[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2016年

7 胡楊;經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件中司法會(huì)計(jì)方法應(yīng)用研究[D];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

8 陳紹娥;司法會(huì)計(jì)在上市公司財(cái)務(wù)舞弊案件中的功能研究[D];云南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年

9 王艷麗;司法會(huì)計(jì)在貪污賄賂犯罪案件偵查中的應(yīng)用研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

10 韓斌;我國(guó)司法會(huì)計(jì)活動(dòng)證據(jù)規(guī)則研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2434823