發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-06 13:22

  本文選題：基金會(huì) + 監(jiān)事會(huì)��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，，隨著社會(huì)意識(shí)的增強(qiáng)及政府權(quán)力的下放，非營(yíng)利組織數(shù)量飛速增長(zhǎng)，關(guān)注度持續(xù)升溫。然而，非營(yíng)利組織在發(fā)展壯大的同時(shí)，不可避免地暴露出公款私用、透明度低等相關(guān)問(wèn)題。通過(guò)梳理不難發(fā)現(xiàn)，非營(yíng)利組織缺乏有效的組織內(nèi)部監(jiān)督，是導(dǎo)致其運(yùn)作出現(xiàn)漏洞的重要原因之一。自監(jiān)事會(huì)制度作為我國(guó)非營(yíng)利組織內(nèi)部監(jiān)督機(jī)構(gòu)實(shí)施以來(lái)，雖對(duì)規(guī)范組織內(nèi)部管理起到了一定積極作用，但監(jiān)事會(huì)并未能如愿完整履行其職能及義務(wù)，仍存在監(jiān)事職責(zé)與權(quán)力不相匹配等情況。 為探究監(jiān)事會(huì)的實(shí)際作用，結(jié)合我國(guó)非營(yíng)利組織的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況，找出影響其有效性發(fā)揮的治理要因，選取了公益基金會(huì)作為典型代表，提出五組假設(shè)，以基金會(huì)中心網(wǎng)披露的120例基金會(huì)樣本為數(shù)據(jù)資料，以分權(quán)制衡理論、委托代理理論、經(jīng)濟(jì)人假設(shè)理論等為研究基礎(chǔ)，運(yùn)用描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)分析，關(guān)系檢驗(yàn)以及逐步回歸分析等實(shí)證方法，旨在探討監(jiān)事會(huì)內(nèi)部特征中監(jiān)事年齡、監(jiān)事會(huì)規(guī)模、監(jiān)事會(huì)會(huì)議次數(shù)、外部監(jiān)事比例與監(jiān)事性別多樣性因子等五個(gè)層面與財(cái)務(wù)治理因子的內(nèi)在關(guān)系。 研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，監(jiān)事會(huì)特征五組因子對(duì)非營(yíng)利組織財(cái)務(wù)治理的影響呈現(xiàn)不同程度的差異。其中外部監(jiān)事人員比例與非營(yíng)利組織財(cái)務(wù)治理呈現(xiàn)顯著相關(guān)性，監(jiān)事年齡、監(jiān)事規(guī)模及監(jiān)事會(huì)會(huì)議次數(shù)對(duì)非營(yíng)利組織財(cái)務(wù)治理的影響不顯著，而監(jiān)事性別多樣性對(duì)非營(yíng)利組織財(cái)務(wù)治理的影響則與假設(shè)相左。 根據(jù)研究結(jié)果，要從根本上打破阻礙非營(yíng)利組織健康發(fā)展的重要瓶頸，必須從完善組織內(nèi)部治理特征入手。為此提出提高外部監(jiān)事的人員比例、培養(yǎng)監(jiān)事人員專(zhuān)業(yè)素質(zhì)、準(zhǔn)確定位監(jiān)事會(huì)角色以及適當(dāng)借鑒國(guó)外監(jiān)管機(jī)制等具體建議，以供參考。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the strengthening of social consciousness and the decentralization of government power, the number of non-profit organizations has increased rapidly and the attention has been rising. However, as NPOs develop and grow, they inevitably expose some related problems, such as private use of public funds and low transparency. It is not difficult to find that the lack of effective internal supervision of non-profit organizations is one of the important reasons leading to loopholes in their operation. Since the implementation of the board of supervisors system as the internal supervisory body of the non-profit organizations in China, although it has played a positive role in standardizing the internal management of the organization, the board of supervisors has failed to fulfill its functions and obligations completely. There are still cases where supervisors' duties and powers do not match. In order to explore the actual role of the board of supervisors, combined with the reality of non-profit organizations in China, to find out the governance factors that affect its effectiveness, select the public welfare foundation as the typical representative, and put forward five hypotheses. On the basis of 120 foundation samples disclosed by the Foundation Central Network, the theory of separation of powers and checks and balances, the principal-agent theory, the hypothesis of economic man, and so on, the descriptive statistical analysis is used. The empirical methods, such as relationship test and stepwise regression analysis, are designed to explore the age of supervisors, the size of board of supervisors, the number of meetings of supervisors in the internal characteristics of the board of supervisors. The internal relationship between the proportion of external supervisors and the gender diversity factor of supervisors and the financial governance factors. It is found that the five groups of factors of board of supervisors have different effects on the financial governance of non-profit organizations. The proportion of external supervisors is significantly correlated with the financial governance of non-profit organizations. The age of supervisors, the size of supervisors and the number of meetings have no significant impact on the financial governance of non-profit organizations. The influence of supervisors' gender diversity on the financial governance of non-profit organizations is contrary to the hypothesis. According to the research results, in order to fundamentally break the important bottleneck that hinders the healthy development of non-profit organizations, we must start with perfecting the internal governance characteristics of the organizations. In order to improve the proportion of external supervisors, train the professional quality of supervisors, accurately locate the role of the board of supervisors and draw on the appropriate supervision mechanism of foreign countries and other specific suggestions for reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F235

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁輝;應(yīng)急決策群體的組織[J];安全;1997年01期

2 賀長(zhǎng)元;完善公司治理關(guān)鍵:監(jiān)事會(huì)職能的重新定位[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

3 尹軍,過(guò)家興;對(duì)安徽省優(yōu)秀教練員年齡結(jié)構(gòu)的研究[J];安徽體育科技;1999年04期

4 張振新;杜光文;王振山;;監(jiān)事會(huì)、董事會(huì)特征與信息披露質(zhì)量[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2011年10期

5 文藝,徐陽(yáng)光,蔣安;論我國(guó)獨(dú)立董事與監(jiān)事會(huì)關(guān)系的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2003年01期

6 伍中信;現(xiàn)代企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)治理結(jié)構(gòu)論綱[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2004年03期

7 薛祖云,黃彤;董事會(huì)、監(jiān)事會(huì)制度特征與會(huì)計(jì)信息質(zhì)量——來(lái)自中國(guó)資本市場(chǎng)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2004年04期

8 馬施;李毓萍;;監(jiān)事會(huì)特征與信息披露質(zhì)量——來(lái)自深交所的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

9 李維安,張亞雙;如何構(gòu)造適合國(guó)情的公司治理監(jiān)督機(jī)制——論我國(guó)監(jiān)事會(huì)的功能定位[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2002年02期

10 陳秀峰;;走向他律與自律:大學(xué)教育基金會(huì)的社會(huì)監(jiān)督機(jī)制探析——以社會(huì)互構(gòu)理論為視角[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年04期

本文編號(hào)：1986682