本文選題：出口貿(mào)易成本 + 貿(mào)易成本測度��； 參考：《世界經(jīng)濟研究》2013年05期

【摘要】：目前測度貿(mào)易成本廣為應(yīng)用的Novy方法存在實踐性缺陷,本文直接基于Andersen多邊一般均衡微觀需求建模思路,重構(gòu)可行的出口貿(mào)易成本測度方程,并以中國經(jīng)驗數(shù)據(jù)為例證與原有方法進(jìn)行了對比分析。結(jié)果表明,兩種方法存在穩(wěn)健的測度差異,很有必要認(rèn)真探討。近年來中國與主要貿(mào)易伙伴雙邊貿(mào)易成本整體加速下降,亞太地區(qū)及北方鄰國貿(mào)易成本明顯小于其他地區(qū)。
[Abstract]:At present, Novy method, which is widely used to measure trade cost, has some practical defects. This paper reconstructs the feasible measurement equation of export trade cost directly based on the idea of Andersen multilateral equilibrium micro demand modeling. The empirical data of China are taken as an example and the original method is compared and analyzed. The results show that there are robust differences between the two methods, so it is necessary to discuss them carefully. Bilateral trade costs between China and its major trading partners have accelerated in recent years, and trade costs in the Asia-Pacific region and neighbouring countries in the north are significantly lower than in other regions.
【作者單位】： 新疆師范大學(xué)法經(jīng)學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究新疆項目(10XJJC790001) 新疆維吾爾自治區(qū)社會科學(xué)基金項目(10BJY013) 新疆師范大學(xué)自治區(qū)高校文科基地中亞與中國西北邊疆政治經(jīng)濟研究中心項目資助
【分類號】：F740.45;F224
，

本文編號：1923961