本文選題：作業(yè)成本法　切入點(diǎn)：量本利　出處：《西安石油大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前,我國(guó)石油鉆探行業(yè)生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)形勢(shì)發(fā)生了巨大變化,鉆探市場(chǎng)全面開放,各方面競(jìng)爭(zhēng)越來越激烈,原有的“一對(duì)一”服務(wù)模式的改變,生產(chǎn)由服務(wù)保障向經(jīng)濟(jì)效益轉(zhuǎn)換,優(yōu)選區(qū)塊、優(yōu)化生產(chǎn)部署成為企業(yè)決策的首要任務(wù),同時(shí),隨著科技的進(jìn)步和生產(chǎn)的提速,行業(yè)的間接成本所占比重急劇上升,用傳統(tǒng)的量本利分析模型進(jìn)行區(qū)塊效益分析嚴(yán)重偏離實(shí)際,管理層急需一套適合鉆探企業(yè)區(qū)塊效益評(píng)價(jià)模型來為之服務(wù)。本文以CQ鉆井公司為例,結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外作業(yè)成本法下量本利分析研究現(xiàn)狀和相關(guān)理論,分析CQ鉆井公司組織架構(gòu)、成本屬性和目前區(qū)塊效益評(píng)價(jià)現(xiàn)狀,以及在傳統(tǒng)量本利分析模型下區(qū)塊效益評(píng)價(jià)存在的缺陷;同時(shí),分析作業(yè)成本法下量本利分析在⑶鉆井公司區(qū)塊效益評(píng)價(jià)中應(yīng)用的必要性和可能性,并利用作業(yè)成本法下量本利分析理論和結(jié)合CQ鉆井公司自身特點(diǎn),構(gòu)建了適合CQ鉆井公司多區(qū)塊的效益評(píng)價(jià)模型一作業(yè)成本法下量本利分析模型;然后,利用CQ鉆井公司2010-2012年各項(xiàng)生產(chǎn)指標(biāo)和歷史財(cái)務(wù)數(shù)據(jù),對(duì)比分析作業(yè)成本法下量本利分析模型和傳統(tǒng)量本利分析模型下⑶鉆井公司區(qū)塊效益評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果的差異,進(jìn)一步闡述作業(yè)成本法下量本利分析模型在⑶鉆井公司區(qū)塊效益評(píng)價(jià)中的適應(yīng)性和有效性。當(dāng)然,本文的研究不是終點(diǎn),因?yàn)槭袌?chǎng)環(huán)境瞬息萬變,隨著內(nèi)外部環(huán)境的不斷變化,作業(yè)成本法下量本利分析模型也可能會(huì)其他模型所取代,但在目前情況來看,最為適應(yīng)CQ鉆井公司區(qū)塊效益評(píng)價(jià)模型依舊是作業(yè)成本法下量本利分析模型,但由于時(shí)間倉(cāng)促、精力有限,作業(yè)的劃分和作業(yè)動(dòng)因的選擇上還需要進(jìn)一步論證,這也是下一步研究的方向和目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:At present, great changes have taken place in the production and management situation of China's oil drilling industry. The drilling market is fully open and the competition in all aspects is becoming more and more intense. With the change of the original "one-to-one" service mode, the production has changed from the service guarantee to the economic benefit.Selection of blocks and optimization of production deployment have become the primary task of enterprise decision-making. At the same time, with the progress of science and technology and the acceleration of production, the proportion of indirect costs in the industry has risen sharply.The traditional quantitative cost-benefit analysis model is seriously deviated from the actual situation, and the management is in urgent need of a suitable evaluation model for the block benefit of drilling enterprises.Taking CQ drilling company as an example, this paper analyzes the organizational structure, cost attributes and current status of block benefit evaluation of CQ drilling company, combining with the current situation and relevant theories of quantitative cost-benefit analysis under Activity-Based costing (ABC) at home and abroad.At the same time, it analyzes the necessity and possibility of the application of cost-benefit analysis in block benefit evaluation of No. 3 drilling company.By using CQ drilling Company's production indexes and historical financial data from 2010 to 2012, the differences of the evaluation results of block benefit of three drilling companies under Activity-Based costing (ABC) and traditional Cost-Benefit Analysis (CQ) are compared and analyzed.The adaptability and effectiveness of the quantitative cost-benefit analysis model under Activity-Based costing in the evaluation of block benefit of No. 3 drilling Company are further expounded.Of course, the study of this paper is not the end, because the market environment changes rapidly, with the constant changes of the internal and external environment, the activity-based costing model may also be replaced by other models, but in the current situation,The most suitable block benefit evaluation model for CQ drilling company is still the quantitative cost-benefit analysis model under Activity-Based costing, but due to the short time and limited energy, the division of operation and the choice of operation motivation need to be further demonstrated.This is also the next research direction and goal.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安石油大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F406.7;F426.22

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙玉霞;;作業(yè)基礎(chǔ)本量利分析法在單項(xiàng)工程成本管理中的應(yīng)用探討[J];平頂山工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

2 曹偉;作業(yè)成本法與變動(dòng)成本法下的本量利分析模型比較[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2005年09期

3 趙選民;張繼偉;;作業(yè)成本法成本動(dòng)因選擇及運(yùn)用[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2010年35期

4 張嬈;作業(yè)成本法的利弊分析——兼論ABC法在我國(guó)的應(yīng)用[J];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

5 王平心,汪方軍,楊敏;作業(yè)基礎(chǔ)本量利模型研究[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2000年06期

6 畢翠霞;;基于作業(yè)成本法的鉆井成本分析初探[J];管理觀察;2008年07期

7 任海云;師萍;;作業(yè)成本法研究現(xiàn)狀綜述[J];中國(guó)管理信息化;2009年04期

8 毛金寶;;傳統(tǒng)方法及作業(yè)基礎(chǔ)下本量利分析模型研究[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2011年02期

9 田穎枝,諸葛良,陳俊芳;作業(yè)成本法在中國(guó)制造企業(yè)應(yīng)用的案例研究[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2002年04期

10 陳倩倩;;基于作業(yè)成本法的本量利分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2012年26期

，

本文編號(hào)：1710599