本文選題：稅法　切入點(diǎn)：會(huì)計(jì)制度　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)市場化和國際化日益加強(qiáng)及會(huì)計(jì)改革的不斷深化,會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法之間的差異日益擴(kuò)大,稅會(huì)差異成為我國經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期的急需解決的焦點(diǎn),會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法之間的表現(xiàn)形式,影響的因素,協(xié)調(diào)的方式等,在實(shí)務(wù)界引起了很大的反響,它關(guān)系到我國稅制和會(huì)計(jì)體系的健全和完善,也成為稅法和會(huì)計(jì)理論界的研究難點(diǎn)和熱點(diǎn),本文正是在這一背景下展開的研究,應(yīng)用理論分析和實(shí)證研究相結(jié)合的方法,探析會(huì)稅差異形成的原因,從制度和業(yè)務(wù)兩個(gè)層面,探索適合我國稅會(huì)差異協(xié)調(diào)的具體建議。 本文首先梳理了國內(nèi)外學(xué)者對稅會(huì)關(guān)系研究的文獻(xiàn),利用前人的研究成果,著重論述了從五個(gè)方面探討了會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法的協(xié)調(diào)問題：1.會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法的關(guān)系。在界定會(huì)計(jì)制度和稅法概念的基礎(chǔ)上,分析稅法與會(huì)計(jì)制度的關(guān)系以及稅會(huì)模式。2.會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法的差異分析。分別按會(huì)計(jì)要素對稅會(huì)差異進(jìn)行分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上對2007-2008年我國上市公司的稅會(huì)差異進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,得出會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法差異的原因是會(huì)計(jì)環(huán)境對稅會(huì)差異的影響和相關(guān)利益者的利益博弈結(jié)果。3.會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法差異協(xié)調(diào)的可能。稅會(huì)分離造成不利影響要求必須建立會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,而在變革中會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法觀念的相互汲取以及我國會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法制定人一致性使得會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法差異協(xié)調(diào)成為可行。4.國外處理會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法差異的借鑒。經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平影響著會(huì)計(jì)制度和稅法的變革,對美、法、日三國稅會(huì)模式依據(jù)的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化特征等進(jìn)行對比分析,從中吸取有益的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn),以找到適合我國會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法協(xié)作的有效途徑。5.我國會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法協(xié)調(diào)的途徑。我國會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅法的差異在加強(qiáng)政府部門的溝通,會(huì)計(jì)制度運(yùn)用中應(yīng)尋求與稅法的協(xié)調(diào),稅法改革中應(yīng)尋求與會(huì)計(jì)制度的協(xié)調(diào)的思路上,分別按會(huì)計(jì)要素對稅會(huì)差異協(xié)調(diào)進(jìn)行設(shè)計(jì),減少稅會(huì)差異。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于：一是依據(jù)會(huì)計(jì)環(huán)境因素對稅會(huì)模式選擇的機(jī)理,從博弈的角度分析稅會(huì)差異的產(chǎn)生與協(xié)調(diào)；二是從制度和業(yè)務(wù)兩個(gè)層面,按會(huì)計(jì)要素提出稅會(huì)差異協(xié)調(diào)設(shè)想,具有可操作性。因而本文的研究結(jié)論可以為政府和企業(yè)協(xié)調(diào)稅會(huì)提供參考意見。
[Abstract]:With the strengthening of marketization and internationalization of economy and the deepening of accounting reform, the difference between accounting system and tax law is widening day by day. The manifestation of accounting system and tax law, the influencing factors, the way of coordination and so on, have caused a great reaction in the practical circles, which is related to the perfection and perfection of tax system and accounting system of our country. It has also become the research difficulty and hot spot in the field of tax law and accounting theory. In this context, this paper, by applying the method of combining theoretical analysis with empirical research, explores the reasons for the formation of tax differences, from the two aspects of system and business. To explore the specific suggestions suitable for the coordination of tax differences in China. This article first combs the domestic and foreign scholars to the tax association relations research literature, uses the predecessor's research result, This paper mainly discusses the coordination between accounting system and tax law from five aspects: 1. The relationship between accounting system and tax law. On the basis of defining the concept of accounting system and tax law, This paper analyzes the relationship between tax law and accounting system and the mode of tax meeting. 2. The difference between accounting system and tax law is analyzed. Based on the analysis of accounting factors, the paper makes an empirical analysis of the tax differences of China's listed companies from 2007 to 2008. It is concluded that the difference between accounting system and tax law is due to the influence of accounting environment on tax differences and the result of interest game between relevant stakeholders. 3. The possibility of coordination between accounting system and tax law. Establish the coordination mechanism between accounting system and tax law, However, the mutual absorption of the concept of accounting system and tax law and the consistency between accounting system and tax code make it feasible to coordinate the difference between accounting system and tax law. 4. The reference of dealing with the difference between accounting system and tax law abroad. The level of economic development affects changes in the accounting system and tax laws, Through comparative analysis of the political, economic and cultural characteristics of the three national tax associations based on the models of the United States, France and Japan, we can draw useful and successful experiences from them. In order to find an effective way to coordinate the accounting system and tax law in our country, the way to coordinate the accounting system and tax law in our country. The difference between the accounting system and tax law in our country is to strengthen the communication between government departments, and the coordination between the accounting system and the tax law should be sought in the application of accounting system. In the reform of the tax law, we should seek the idea of coordinating with the accounting system, and design the tax differences according to the accounting elements to reduce the tax differences. The innovation of this paper lies in the following aspects: first, according to the mechanism of accounting environment factors' choice of tax meeting mode, the author analyzes the generation and coordination of tax meeting difference from the angle of game, second, from the system and business level, It is feasible to put forward the concordance of tax differences according to the accounting factors, so the conclusion of this paper can provide reference for the government and enterprises to coordinate the tax.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F233;F812.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳萍;;會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則制定的制度博弈思考[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2006年02期

2 周萍華;從世界兩大稅務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)模式探析我國所得稅會(huì)計(jì)——我國所得稅會(huì)計(jì)與國際慣例的比較[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2003年04期

3 卓敏;;我國稅收與會(huì)計(jì)關(guān)系模式的選擇及其差異協(xié)調(diào)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2007年01期

4 任立乾;淺談企業(yè)所得稅會(huì)計(jì)與稅法的差異及其協(xié)調(diào)對策[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年05期

5 宋常,邢敏,湯寧;稅收法規(guī)與會(huì)計(jì)規(guī)制引發(fā)的所得稅差異及其協(xié)調(diào)[J];審計(jì)與理財(cái);2004年12期

6 鄧力平,曲曉輝;稅收國際協(xié)調(diào)與會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則全球趨同關(guān)系之辨析[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2003年09期

7 戴德明;張妍;何玉潤;;我國會(huì)計(jì)制度與稅收法規(guī)的協(xié)作研究——基于稅會(huì)關(guān)系模式與二者差異的分析[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2005年01期

8 梁爽;;會(huì)計(jì)目標(biāo)與會(huì)計(jì)環(huán)境邏輯關(guān)系剖析[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2005年01期

9 樓繼偉;;中國企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則建設(shè)的可貴實(shí)踐和嶄新突破[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2006年02期

10 薛麗達(dá);張菊香;王敬勇;;會(huì)計(jì)制度的不完全性:基于博弈的理論分析[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年03期

，

本文編號：1664855