本文選題：農(nóng)業(yè)部門　切入點：績效評價　出處：《吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著社會主義市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展和改革開放的不斷深入，人們對政府的治理能力要求越來越高。為提高政府在人們心中的滿意度，樹立政府的公信力和良好的形象，績效評價被應(yīng)用到政府系統(tǒng)中來。農(nóng)業(yè)部門作為政府的重要部門，，關(guān)系到上億農(nóng)民群眾的利益，尤其是對我國這樣一個農(nóng)業(yè)大國而言，在農(nóng)業(yè)部門中應(yīng)用績效評價具有重要的意義和價值。本文就是以A市美國白蛾飛防項目為例，結(jié)合我國政府部門績效評價運用的現(xiàn)狀分析，提出了目前我國政府農(nóng)業(yè)部門績效評價應(yīng)用方面存在的問題，從績效評價環(huán)境、體系等方面出發(fā)，促進政府內(nèi)外評價機制的結(jié)合，推動政府農(nóng)業(yè)部門績效評價系統(tǒng)向著規(guī)范化、系統(tǒng)化、科學(xué)化和制度化的方向發(fā)展。 20世紀(jì)70年代末、80年代初，為有效應(yīng)對經(jīng)濟全球化、科技進步和國內(nèi)環(huán)境的巨大變化所帶來的猛烈沖擊，走出政府財政危機、管理危機和信任危機的困境，英、美等西方各國普遍實施了新公共管理運動，績效評價作為一種評價和改進政府績效的實用工具及提高政府績效管理水平的有效手段，逐步在政府管理中得到應(yīng)用。在我國，財政支出績效是政府績效的重要體現(xiàn)，通過財政支出績效評價，客觀評判政府資金投入和政府行為的實際效果，可以對政府部門自身管理是否科學(xué)有一個基本評價。近年來，績效評價被拓展運用于我國政府各部門的管理，財政部部長樓繼偉在財政廳（局）長座談會上明確要求“要推進預(yù)算績效管理，將績效觀念和績效要求貫穿于財政管理各個方面，對一些重大專項做中期績效評價”。2013年，財政部印發(fā)《預(yù)算績效評價共性指標(biāo)框架》，不斷加強和規(guī)范績效評價工作。 同時，我國績效評價理論研究和實踐運用也存在著一些不足。就政府農(nóng)業(yè)部門存在的問題，具體來說，主要包括評價主體單一、公共利益缺失、信息不對稱以及評價系統(tǒng)不健全等方面，并對問題產(chǎn)生的原因進行分析，包括績效評價價值標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不健全、缺乏全面的評價體系和完備的理論支撐等，為提出解決方案奠定基礎(chǔ)。通過實例論證的方法，以A市美國白蛾飛防項目為案例進行分析，包括項目的基本情況介紹、項目采用的方法、取得的成效以及績效評價在項目中的應(yīng)用，分析該項目取得的成績和該項目的績效評價對農(nóng)業(yè)部門發(fā)揮的作用，同時分析存在的問題。最后提出建議，從準(zhǔn)確定位政府角色、營造良好的政府績效評價環(huán)境、完善我國政府績效評價的指標(biāo)體系、加強政府績效評價的制度建設(shè)以及創(chuàng)新政府績效評價的技術(shù)手段等五個方面進行完善。
[Abstract]:With the development of socialist market economy and the deepening of reform and opening up, people have higher and higher demands on the government's ability to govern. In order to improve the satisfaction of the government in people's minds, to establish the credibility and good image of the government, Performance evaluation is applied to the government system. As an important department of the government, the agricultural sector is related to the interests of hundreds of millions of farmers, especially for a large agricultural country like China. The application of performance evaluation in agricultural sector is of great significance and value. This paper puts forward the problems existing in the application of the performance evaluation of the agricultural sector in our country at present. From the aspects of the performance evaluation environment and system, it promotes the combination of the internal and external evaluation mechanism of the government and promotes the standardization of the performance evaluation system of the government agricultural sector. Systematic, scientific and institutionalized development. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, in order to effectively cope with the fierce impact of economic globalization, scientific and technological progress and the tremendous changes in the domestic environment, we emerged from the dilemma of the government's financial crisis, management crisis and trust crisis. The United States and other western countries have generally implemented the New Public Management Movement. As a practical tool for evaluating and improving government performance and an effective means to improve the level of government performance management, performance evaluation has been gradually applied in government management. The performance of financial expenditure is an important embodiment of government performance. By evaluating the performance of fiscal expenditure and objectively judging the actual effect of government investment and government behavior, we can have a basic evaluation on whether the government departments themselves manage scientifically or not in recent years. Performance evaluation has been extended to the management of various departments of the Chinese government. Lou Jiwei, Minister of Finance, explicitly requested that "budget performance management should be promoted," at a forum of finance department (bureau) ministers. In 2013, the Ministry of Finance issued the Common Index Framework of Budget performance Evaluation to strengthen and standardize the performance evaluation work. At the same time, there are some deficiencies in the theoretical research and practical application of performance evaluation in China. The information asymmetry and the evaluation system are not perfect, and the causes of the problems are analyzed, including the imperfect value standard of performance evaluation, the lack of comprehensive evaluation system and the complete theoretical support, etc. In order to lay the foundation for the solution. Through the method of case study, taking the American White moth flight control project in A city as a case study, including the basic information of the project, the method adopted by the project, The results achieved and the application of performance evaluation in the project, the analysis of the achievements of the project and the impact of the performance evaluation of the project on the agricultural sector, and the analysis of the existing problems. To build a good environment for government performance evaluation, improve the index system of government performance evaluation, strengthen the system construction of government performance evaluation and innovate the technical means of government performance evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F810.6;D630

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 范柏乃;程宏偉;張莉;;韓國政府績效評估及其對中國的借鑒意義[J];公共管理學(xué)報;2006年02期

2 陳振明;;公共部門績效管理的理論與實踐[J];中國工商管理研究;2006年12期

3 周志忍;;公共組織績效評估：中國實踐的回顧與反思[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

4 許一;;目標(biāo)管理理論述評[J];外國經(jīng)濟與管理;2006年09期

5 靳永翥;;從“良政”走向“善治”——一種社會理論的檢視[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社科版);2010年02期

6 馬寶成;試論政府績效評估的價值取向[J];中國行政管理;2001年05期

7 彭國甫;價值取向是地方政府績效評估的深層結(jié)構(gòu)[J];中國行政管理;2004年07期

8 彭國甫;張玉亮;;追尋工具理性與價值理性的整合——地方政府公共事業(yè)管理績效評估的發(fā)展方向[J];中國行政管理;2007年06期

本文編號：1579605