本文關(guān)鍵詞：先進(jìn)制造技術(shù)投資項目社會評價研究　出處：《燕山大學(xué)》2014年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 先進(jìn)制造技術(shù) 投資項目 社會評價 貨幣化

【摘要】：先進(jìn)制造技術(shù)AMT(Advanced Manufacturing Technology)是指在保留傳統(tǒng)制造技術(shù)有效要素的基礎(chǔ)上，不斷吸收科技發(fā)展新成果實現(xiàn)新的制造技術(shù)的總稱。當(dāng)前，我國工業(yè)化進(jìn)程進(jìn)入轉(zhuǎn)型關(guān)鍵期，AMT作為制造業(yè)應(yīng)用發(fā)展的必然趨勢，項目的不斷引入不僅給企業(yè)帶來微觀層面的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和無形戰(zhàn)略效益，同時對區(qū)域自然環(huán)境和社會經(jīng)濟(jì)政治文化環(huán)境等各個方面也產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的影響。在“以人為本”為核心的可持續(xù)發(fā)展觀下，投資決策不僅要重視項目投資的微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)效益，更要從全社會角度去考核項目對自然、社會以及經(jīng)濟(jì)等各方面的影響。在此背景下，本研究在相關(guān)理論支撐基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建AMT投資項目社會評價體系，，并試圖實現(xiàn)評價結(jié)果的量化、貨幣化，為實際決策提供科學(xué)依據(jù)。 首先，第一章內(nèi)容在明確投資項目社會評價的范疇基礎(chǔ)之上，選擇宏觀角度作為研究切入點，通過緒論論述選題來源、研究意義之后，明確了研究內(nèi)容和研究技術(shù)路線。第二章給出整個研究的理論基礎(chǔ)，根據(jù)外部性理論，基于“以人為本”的可持續(xù)發(fā)展觀下，對AMT投資項目展開全面綜合的社會評價，識別項目對社會系統(tǒng)的影響。論文的第三章內(nèi)容從AMT投資項目對宏觀社會系統(tǒng)可能產(chǎn)生的社會經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會環(huán)境、自然環(huán)境以及項目與區(qū)域的互適性四個方面構(gòu)建AMT投資項目社會評價的評價系統(tǒng)框架，并系統(tǒng)分析了在開展社會評價時，需要識別的AMT投資項目的引入可能給區(qū)域社會帶來的具體影響，同時進(jìn)行AMT投資項目社會評價系統(tǒng)指標(biāo)量化研究。 為了使研究更加具有實用性，第四章通過構(gòu)建自然環(huán)境資源價值量化評估“新三分法”——直接價值法、替代價值法和效用測度法方法框架，對AMT投資項目的自然環(huán)境影響評價給出了較為具體的量化方案。同時，在第五章借助陳述偏好法中較為成熟的條件極值法CVM，通過問卷調(diào)研的方式結(jié)合雙邊界二分法的消費者支付(受償)引導(dǎo)方法，對調(diào)研問題進(jìn)行啟發(fā)式詢問，最終對社會評價中難以找到相關(guān)市場價值衡量的社會影響評價指標(biāo)進(jìn)行貨幣化。為了使得最終得到AMT項目社會評價的量化結(jié)果，文章第六章主要對AMT投資項目的社會互適性評價指標(biāo)進(jìn)行量化，并借助Stackelberg模型對AMT項目與區(qū)域社會互適性進(jìn)行博弈過程分析。第七章內(nèi)容借助粗糙集算法理論對構(gòu)建的指標(biāo)系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行篩選，以及信息熵理論對各項指標(biāo)賦予相對客觀的權(quán)重，實現(xiàn)評價模型的集成。 第八章內(nèi)容通過秦皇島臻鼎科技有限公司CAM生產(chǎn)系統(tǒng)的實證研究，對所構(gòu)建的評價模型進(jìn)行適用性印證，實證研究發(fā)現(xiàn)對AMT項目進(jìn)行社會評價有助于識別項目給區(qū)域社會帶來的不同方面的影響，而模型最后的綜合評價值則在進(jìn)行方案評判和比選的時候具有實際應(yīng)用價值。
[Abstract]:Advanced manufacturing technology (AMT(Advanced Manufacturing technology) refers to the retention of traditional manufacturing technology on the basis of effective elements. At present, the process of industrialization in China has entered a critical period of transition, AMT as an inevitable trend of manufacturing application development. The continuous introduction of projects not only brings micro-level economic benefits and intangible strategic benefits to enterprises. At the same time, the regional natural environment and social, economic, political and cultural environment and other aspects also have a far-reaching impact. "people-oriented" as the core of the concept of sustainable development. Investment decision should not only pay attention to the micro-economic benefits of project investment, but also assess the impact of the project on the natural, social and economic aspects from the perspective of the whole society. On the basis of relevant theories, this study constructs the social evaluation system of AMT investment projects, and tries to realize the quantification and monetization of the evaluation results, which provides a scientific basis for the actual decision-making. First of all, the content of the first chapter in the clear investment project social evaluation on the basis of the category, choose a macro perspective as the research entry point, through the introduction to discuss the source of the topic, after the research significance. The second chapter gives the theoretical basis of the whole study, according to the theory of externality, based on the "people-oriented" concept of sustainable development. Comprehensive social evaluation of AMT investment projects to identify the impact of the project on the social system. The third chapter of the paper from the AMT investment projects on the macro social system likely to produce the social economy. Social environment, natural environment and mutual applicability of the project and the region of four aspects of the AMT investment project social evaluation system framework, and a systematic analysis of the development of social evaluation. The introduction of AMT investment projects that need to be identified may have a specific impact on the regional society. At the same time, the quantitative research on the social evaluation system indicators of AMT investment projects is carried out. In order to make the research more practical, chapter 4th constructs the framework of "new three-point method", "direct value method", alternative value method and utility measure method to evaluate the value of natural environment resources. At the same time, in Chapter 5th, we give a more specific quantitative scheme for the natural environment impact assessment of AMT investment projects. At the same time, in Chapter 5th, we use the more mature conditional extreme value method (CVM), which is a more mature method of preference statement. Through the questionnaire survey combined with the dual-boundary dichotomy of consumer payment (compensation) guidance method, the investigation of the question of heuristic inquiry. Finally, it is difficult to find the relevant market value in the social evaluation of social impact evaluation indicators to monetize, in order to make the final AMT project social evaluation results. Chapter 6th quantifies the social interoperability evaluation index of AMT investment projects. The Stackelberg model is used to analyze the interaction between AMT project and regional society. Chapter 7th selects the index system based on rough set algorithm theory. And the information entropy theory gives relative objective weight to each index to realize the integration of evaluation model. Chapter 8th through Qinhuangdao Zhending Technology Co., Ltd. CAM production system empirical research, the evaluation model built to verify the applicability. Empirical study found that social evaluation of AMT projects can help to identify the impact of the project on different aspects of regional society. The final comprehensive evaluation value of the model has practical application value in scheme evaluation and comparison.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F406.7;F424

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭運芳;關(guān)于投資項目社會評價的思考[J];武漢科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年03期

2 歐壽銘;;環(huán)境影響評價新的生長點——社會影響評價[J];廈門科技;2007年03期

3 梁梁,吳廣謀,盛昭瀚;一種多層次多指標(biāo)體系綜合評判的新方法[J];系統(tǒng)工程理論與實踐;1991年05期

4 薛曉娟;投資項目社會評價研究[J];沿海企業(yè)與科技;2005年02期

5 賀仲雄,隋志強;FHW決策系統(tǒng) 第三講[J];預(yù)測;1988年02期

6 李春好;先進(jìn)制造技術(shù)選擇的多目標(biāo)廣義投資效率模型[J];中國軟科學(xué);2002年08期

7 姜華;丁凱;;開展社會影響評價日顯緊迫[J];浙江經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年07期

8 朱吉祥;張禮中;周小元;梁國玲;王乾;蔡子昭;王偉;;基于信息熵的灰色模型在地質(zhì)災(zāi)害評價中的應(yīng)用——以四川青川縣為例[J];災(zāi)害學(xué);2012年01期

9 譚永忠;王慶日;陳佳;牟永銘;張潔;;耕地資源非市場價值評價方法的研究進(jìn)展與述評[J];自然資源學(xué)報;2012年05期

10 江沖;金建君;李論;;基于CVM的耕地資源保護(hù)非市場價值研究——以浙江省溫嶺市為例[J];資源科學(xué);2011年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 賀全龍;基于熵的建筑工程項目沖突事件互適性研究[D];天津大學(xué);2007年

2 吳迪;社會進(jìn)步評價尺度研究[D];中共中央黨校;2012年

本文編號：1428629