本文選題：糾錯機制　切入點：問責(zé)主體　出處：《人民論壇》2013年33期

【摘要】：正對我國決策問責(zé)與糾錯機制現(xiàn)狀進行分析可以發(fā)現(xiàn),當(dāng)前我國決策問責(zé)與糾錯制度雖已建立,但并不能有效約束政府權(quán)力。新制度經(jīng)濟學(xué)國家理論表明,只有權(quán)力才能控制權(quán)力,所以應(yīng)引入多元問責(zé)主體,既充分發(fā)揮黨的紀(jì)律檢查機構(gòu)的監(jiān)督作用,又強化人民代表大會的監(jiān)督權(quán),同時鼓勵和拓展社會問責(zé)。另外,還需要加大對問責(zé)對象的懲罰力度,提高政府決策效率。
[Abstract]:Through the analysis of the present situation of decision-making accountability and error correction mechanism in China, we can find that although the system of decision-making accountability and error correction has been established, it can not restrain government power effectively. Only power can control power, so we should introduce multiple subjects of accountability, not only give full play to the supervisory role of the party's disciplinary inspection organs, but also strengthen the supervisory power of the people's congresses, and at the same time encourage and expand social accountability. We also need to increase the punishment of accountability objects and improve the efficiency of government decision-making.
【作者單位】： 中央財經(jīng)大學(xué)中國發(fā)展和改革研究院;中央財經(jīng)大學(xué);桂林師范高等�？茖W(xué)校;
【分類號】：D630;F014

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張長云;;黨內(nèi)糾錯機制的探索與實踐[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué);2009年31期

2 楚東;;更和軟兩手糾錯[J];w，

本文編號：1685511