本文關(guān)鍵詞：可持續(xù)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)理論及指標(biāo)體系研究　出處：《天津大學(xué)》2005年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 可持續(xù)發(fā)展 外部性 可持續(xù)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長模型 可持續(xù)發(fā)展指標(biāo) 綠色國民核算 真實(shí)儲蓄 生態(tài)足跡

【摘要】： 可持續(xù)發(fā)展是一個(gè)涉及經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會、人口、資源、環(huán)境、文化等眾多領(lǐng)域的全面發(fā)展�，F(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展過程中出現(xiàn)的人口壓力、資源耗竭以及環(huán)境污染直接導(dǎo)致了可持續(xù)發(fā)展問題的提出。在眾多學(xué)者對可持續(xù)發(fā)展的不倦探索和在已有的各學(xué)科理論的滋養(yǎng)下,可持續(xù)發(fā)展理論已初具雛形,可持續(xù)發(fā)展觀念已被普遍接受。 對可持續(xù)發(fā)展論述的目的,就是要建立了一個(gè)清晰的可持續(xù)發(fā)展框架以便于深入研究。在微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)分析部分,明確指出主流經(jīng)濟(jì)理論中若干非持續(xù)性假定;外部性的存在使得社會資源配置效率低下,社會凈福利遭受損失,是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展不可持續(xù)的根源。消除外部性的根本措施是外部成本內(nèi)在化,產(chǎn)權(quán)明晰和政府干預(yù)也是重要的手段;對正效用的偏好可以內(nèi)在地調(diào)節(jié)代際資源配置不公。宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)分析論證了可持續(xù)發(fā)展的非線性,說明全球同時(shí)踏上可持續(xù)發(fā)展的道路是不現(xiàn)實(shí)的。盡管發(fā)達(dá)國家和發(fā)展中國家存在著不同的可持續(xù)和發(fā)展偏好,但走向聯(lián)合是必然趨勢,拓展的蜈蚣博弈、無名氏定理等對此也予以了證明。運(yùn)用IS-LM-EE曲線探討三市場的均衡變動(dòng)時(shí),明確地反映出貨幣政策、財(cái)政政策和環(huán)境政策在宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)調(diào)控中的相互協(xié)調(diào)過程。 在Romer內(nèi)生增長理論上構(gòu)建的反映資本全貌的生產(chǎn)函數(shù)是本文的亮點(diǎn)之一。各人均變量變化率、儲蓄率、人口增長率、折舊率以及各資本投入彈性之間復(fù)雜密切的關(guān)系可以在嚴(yán)密的數(shù)學(xué)推導(dǎo)中反映出來,人均資本增長率和人均收入變化率的取值及變動(dòng)范圍也得到確定。本文構(gòu)建的增長模型可預(yù)見憑直覺難以洞悉的細(xì)節(jié),并得出一些與理論和事實(shí)相符的結(jié)論。該模型是對可持續(xù)發(fā)展理論的豐富。 在對可持續(xù)發(fā)展指標(biāo)體系及評價(jià)方法論述時(shí),研究顯著側(cè)重于GGDP、GS和EF部分,以此為后續(xù)的實(shí)證研究做充分鋪墊。此外,在Weitzman和Hartwick的研究框架下提出了單一綠色國民核算模型。實(shí)證部分通過對1991～2003年中國、內(nèi)蒙古和天津市的經(jīng)濟(jì)進(jìn)行定量評估,得出了許多可供科學(xué)決策的依據(jù),開辟了一條可行的核算思路。
[Abstract]:Sustainable development is a comprehensive development involving economy, society, population, resources, environment, culture and so on. Resource depletion and environmental pollution directly lead to the issue of sustainable development. With the tireless exploration of sustainable development by many scholars and the nourishment of existing theories of various disciplines, the theory of sustainable development has begun to take shape. The concept of sustainable development has been widely accepted. The purpose of the discussion of sustainable development is to establish a clear framework of sustainable development for further study. In the part of microeconomic analysis, it points out some assumptions of non-sustainability in mainstream economic theory. The existence of externality causes the low efficiency of social resource allocation and the loss of social net welfare, which is the root of unsustainable economic development. The fundamental measure to eliminate externality is internalization of external cost. The clarity of property rights and government intervention are also important means; The preference for positive utility can internally adjust the unfair allocation of intergenerational resources. Macroeconomic analysis demonstrates the nonlinearity of sustainable development. It shows that it is unrealistic for the world to embark on the road of sustainable development at the same time. Although there are different preferences for sustainability and development in developed and developing countries, it is inevitable to move towards union and expand the centipede game. This is also proved by the Anonymous theorem. When we use the IS-LM-EE curve to study the equilibrium change of the three markets, it clearly reflects the monetary policy. The process of coordination between fiscal policy and environmental policy in macroeconomic regulation and control. One of the bright spots of this paper is the production function which is constructed on the theory of Romer endogenous growth reflecting the whole picture of capital. The rate of change of each variable, the rate of saving, and the rate of population growth are all variable. The complicated and close relationship between depreciation rate and the elasticity of capital input can be reflected in strict mathematical derivation. The growth rate of per capita capital and the change rate of per capita income are also determined. The growth model constructed in this paper can foresee the details which are difficult to understand intuitively. Some conclusions consistent with the theory and facts are obtained. The model is rich in the theory of sustainable development. In the sustainable development indicators system and evaluation methods, the study focused significantly on GGDPGS and EF parts, in order to do the follow-up empirical research. In addition. Under the framework of Weitzman and Hartwick, a single green national accounting model is proposed. The quantitative evaluation of the economy of Inner Mongolia and Tianjin has obtained many scientific basis for decision making and has opened up a feasible way of accounting.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號】：F061.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 郭小東;華光;;試論我國財(cái)稅科學(xué)發(fā)展指數(shù)的構(gòu)建——基于層次分析法的研究[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2010年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 侯偉;城鄉(xiāng)總體規(guī)劃戰(zhàn)略環(huán)境評價(jià)研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

2 劉淵;真實(shí)儲蓄測度理論與方法研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

3 刁巍楊;我國區(qū)域資源保障程度評價(jià)及空間分異特征研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 潘慧玲;內(nèi)蒙古阿拉善盟可持續(xù)發(fā)展問題研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

2 付支霞;白山市可持續(xù)發(fā)展能力評價(jià)[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年

3 李銳;沈陽市能耗與經(jīng)濟(jì)、環(huán)境及人口的相關(guān)性分析[D];東北大學(xué);2008年

4 王允;新型農(nóng)村社會養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2012年

5 孟憲振;城市可持續(xù)發(fā)展指標(biāo)體系的比較研究[D];重慶交通大學(xué);2012年

6 張欣;我國城鎮(zhèn)職工基本養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)制度可持續(xù)發(fā)展對策研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

7 羅燦;面向可持續(xù)利用的水資源建模與仿真[D];華中科技大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1410816