【摘要】：為滿足中低收入家庭的住房需求我國(guó)實(shí)施了“商品歸商品，保障歸保障”的雙軌制住房制度。由于我國(guó)保障房建設(shè)起步晚，住房制度尚不完善，保障房建設(shè)遇到困難，如供給過分依賴于保障房新建、保障房選址不合理、質(zhì)量不達(dá)標(biāo)，形成無效供給、建設(shè)資金與運(yùn)營(yíng)資金短缺問題。這些問題可通過住房流轉(zhuǎn)得到解決。本研究將以住房流轉(zhuǎn)因素為視角促進(jìn)住房流轉(zhuǎn)進(jìn)而為這些問題的解決提出建議。 本文主要采用案例分析法和比較歸納法，依據(jù)美國(guó)、荷蘭商品房市場(chǎng)過濾的實(shí)踐提出影響住房過濾的五大關(guān)鍵，即當(dāng)前住房特征、家庭收入、家庭生命周期、家庭成員結(jié)構(gòu)和住房消費(fèi)行為。住房過濾在地理空間上表現(xiàn)為家庭居住向郊區(qū)擴(kuò)散。按照政府力量介入住房體系程度本文以美國(guó)、新加坡、香港為例，探討不同國(guó)家為實(shí)現(xiàn)保障房流轉(zhuǎn)所把握關(guān)鍵因素的區(qū)別，研究發(fā)現(xiàn)以市場(chǎng)力量為主的美國(guó)通過家庭收入因素，實(shí)現(xiàn)存量房由商品房體系向保障房體系流轉(zhuǎn)；以政府力量為主的新加坡著重考慮住房特征、家庭生命周、家庭成員結(jié)構(gòu)因素，以組屋第二市場(chǎng)實(shí)現(xiàn)住房流轉(zhuǎn)，政府力量和市場(chǎng)力量相對(duì)均衡的香港則以住房特征將住房市場(chǎng)劃分為三個(gè)供給層次以家庭收入限制和居屋第二市場(chǎng)實(shí)現(xiàn)公屋流轉(zhuǎn)。在地里空間分布上,美國(guó)保障房和新加坡組屋都明顯呈現(xiàn)向郊區(qū)過濾現(xiàn)象，但香港并不明顯。 本研究一方面進(jìn)一步充實(shí)住房過濾理論完善住房流轉(zhuǎn)影響因素，為我國(guó)住房保障政策提供理論基礎(chǔ)，另一方面在實(shí)踐中建議我國(guó)住房特征形成梯度供給、成立調(diào)研小組定期調(diào)查被保障家庭結(jié)構(gòu)與生命周期、對(duì)家庭收入因素可采用的兩種應(yīng)用及長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)來看減少住房政策對(duì)購(gòu)房轉(zhuǎn)售政策的限制。由于研究數(shù)據(jù)限制，本文只提出影響住房流轉(zhuǎn)的因素，各因素按重要性的排序及對(duì)住房流轉(zhuǎn)的影響力度尚須進(jìn)一步論證。
[Abstract]:In order to meet the housing needs of middle and low income families, China has implemented a two-track housing system, which is "goods for commodities, security for security". Due to the late start of indemnificatory apartment's construction and the imperfect housing system in our country, the construction of indemnificatory apartment has encountered difficulties, such as excessive reliance on the new construction of indemnificatory apartment, unreasonable location and poor quality, which has resulted in an ineffective supply. Shortage of construction and operating funds. These problems can be solved through housing circulation. This study will promote housing circulation from the perspective of housing transfer factors, and then give some suggestions to solve these problems. Based on the practice of filtering the commercial housing market in the United States and the Netherlands, this paper mainly uses case analysis and comparative induction to put forward five key factors that affect housing filtering, namely, current housing characteristics, family income, family life cycle, and so on. Family member structure and housing consumption behavior. Housing filtering in the geographical space for the spread of family to the suburbs. According to the degree of government intervention in housing system this paper takes the United States, Singapore and Hong Kong as an example to explore the differences of key factors held by different countries in order to realize indemnificatory apartment's circulation. The study finds that the United States, which is dominated by market forces, passes through family income factors. To realize the circulation of stock housing from commercial housing system to indemnificatory apartment system; Singapore, which is dominated by government forces, focuses on housing characteristics, family life week, family members' structure, and the realization of housing circulation in the secondary housing market. Hong Kong, where government power and market power are relatively balanced, divides the housing market into three levels of supply according to housing characteristics. Public housing flows are realized by household income constraints and the secondary market of HOS flats. In the spatial distribution of the field, indemnificatory apartment and Singapore house are obviously filtered into the suburbs, but Hong Kong is not obvious. On the one hand, this study further enriches the housing filtering theory to perfect the influencing factors of housing circulation, and provides the theoretical basis for the housing security policy of our country. On the other hand, it suggests that the housing characteristics of our country form a gradient supply in practice. A research group was set up to investigate the two kinds of application of family structure and life cycle, and to reduce the restriction of house purchase and resale policy in the long run. Because of the limitation of the research data, this paper only puts forward the factors that affect the housing circulation, and the order of the factors according to the importance and the influence on the housing circulation still need to be further demonstrated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳章喜;翟敏如;;關(guān)于住房保障影響居民消費(fèi)的實(shí)證分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2012年06期

2 周精靈;劉丹;;香港公屋制度對(duì)我國(guó)廉租住房制度的啟示[J];長(zhǎng)春大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

3 李揚(yáng);汪利娜;殷劍峰;;普遍住房保障制度比較和對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年01期

4 劉志林;;低收入住房政策模式選擇的中央一地方差異——基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析法(ANP)的決策模型分析[J];城市與區(qū)域規(guī)劃研究;2009年02期

5 鄧大偉;諸大建;;保障性住房提供的強(qiáng)制性指標(biāo)配建模式探討——基于住房的屬性[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2009年01期

6 張庭偉;實(shí)現(xiàn)小康后的住宅發(fā)展問題——從美國(guó)60年來住房政策的演變看中國(guó)的住房發(fā)展[J];城市規(guī)劃;2001年04期

7 譚禹;;二元化住房制度與住房市場(chǎng)問題的解決[J];城市問題;2009年09期

8 柳德榮;;美國(guó)的廉租住房保障措施及借鑒[J];城市問題;2011年07期

9 李莉;王旭;;美國(guó)公共住房政策的演變與啟示[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2007年05期

10 王喜梅;張橋云;;美國(guó)社會(huì)管理對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示——以住房保障為例[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2013年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2405390