本文選題：證券業(yè) + 系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)��； 參考：《廈門大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：2007年美國(guó)次貸危機(jī)引發(fā)全球性的金融危機(jī),系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)在世界范圍內(nèi)快速傳播,各國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)、金融發(fā)展受到了巨大的影響,各金融機(jī)構(gòu)以及各國(guó)監(jiān)管部門開始將系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的預(yù)警和防范作為風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理的一個(gè)重點(diǎn)。此次危機(jī)雖然已經(jīng)接近尾聲,但是關(guān)于系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的測(cè)度和防范將成為金融業(yè)永恒的主題。 本文通過(guò)回顧關(guān)于系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度量方法的相關(guān)理論和實(shí)證研究,引出了本文研究所使用的CoVaR方法。通過(guò)詳細(xì)介紹該方法的原理和實(shí)際操作,以我國(guó)11家上市證券公司為研究對(duì)象,對(duì)我國(guó)證券業(yè)的系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析。本文使用分位數(shù)回歸方法求解VaR和CoVaR,計(jì)算我國(guó)證券業(yè)以及各證券公司的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)價(jià)值和各公司與行業(yè)之間的相互風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溢出效應(yīng),得到可以量化的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)值和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溢出率。 實(shí)證結(jié)果表明,使用VaR方法可能會(huì)低估證券公司以及證券業(yè)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)水平,尤其是極端事件發(fā)生的時(shí)候；而CoVaR方法能夠較為全面的捕捉各機(jī)構(gòu)處于極端狀況時(shí)對(duì)行業(yè)整體風(fēng)險(xiǎn)值的影響,以及行業(yè)處于極端狀況時(shí)對(duì)各機(jī)構(gòu)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)值的影響,因此相對(duì)于傳統(tǒng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度量方法而言,CoVaR是比較全面和有效的方法。實(shí)證結(jié)果還表明,各證券公司對(duì)證券業(yè)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溢出效應(yīng)與其資產(chǎn)或者市值規(guī)模并沒(méi)有必然的關(guān)系。自身風(fēng)險(xiǎn)水平較低的證券公司對(duì)行業(yè)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溢出效應(yīng)較低,而行業(yè)對(duì)這些證券公司的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溢出效應(yīng)則較高。使用CoVaR方法可以度量各證券公司對(duì)行業(yè)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溢出效應(yīng)大小以及各個(gè)證券公司受到行業(yè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)爆發(fā)的影響大小,但是這并不能代表公司對(duì)行業(yè)收益水平的影響力,事實(shí)上,這二者之間并不沖突。文章最后針對(duì)實(shí)證分析的結(jié)論,對(duì)我國(guó)證券公司的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范和監(jiān)管部門的監(jiān)管提出政策建議。
[Abstract]:In 2007, the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States triggered a global financial crisis, systemic risk spread rapidly around the world, and the economic and financial development of various countries was greatly affected. Financial institutions and national regulators have begun to place systemic risk warning and prevention as a focus of risk management. Although the crisis has come to an end, the measurement and prevention of systemic risk will become the eternal theme of the financial industry. By reviewing the relevant theoretical and empirical research on systematic risk measurement, this paper leads to the CoVaR method used in this paper. By introducing the principle and practice of this method in detail, taking 11 listed securities companies in China as the research object, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the systemic risk of the securities industry in China. In this paper, the quantile regression method is used to solve VaR and CoVaR, and the risk value and mutual risk spillover effect between companies and industries are calculated, and the quantifiable risk value and risk spillover rate are obtained. The empirical results show that the VaR method may underestimate the risk level of securities firms and securities industry, especially when extreme events occur. The CoVaR method can comprehensively capture the impact of the institutions in extreme conditions on the overall risk value of the industry and the impact of the industry in the extreme situation on the risk value of each organization. Therefore, CoVaR is more comprehensive and effective than the traditional risk measurement method. The empirical results also show that the risk spillover effect of securities firms to the securities industry is not necessarily related to their assets or the scale of market value. The securities companies with lower risk level have lower risk spillover effect on the industry, while the risk spillover effect of the industry on these securities companies is higher. The CoVaR method can measure the risk spillover effect of each securities company to the industry and the impact of the industry risk explosion on each securities company, but this does not represent the influence of the company on the industry income level, in fact, the risk spillover effect of each securities company on the industry can be measured. There is no conflict between the two. Finally, based on the conclusion of empirical analysis, the paper puts forward some policy suggestions on the risk prevention and supervision of securities companies in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F224;F832.39

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李進(jìn)安;對(duì)證券公司風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理制度建設(shè)的思考[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2004年12期

2 董青馬;盧滿生;;金融開放度與發(fā)展程度差異對(duì)銀行危機(jī)生成機(jī)制影響的實(shí)證分析[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2010年06期

3 張曉樸;;系統(tǒng)性金融風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究:演進(jìn)、成因與監(jiān)管[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2010年07期

4 郭衛(wèi)東;;中國(guó)上市銀行的系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)價(jià)值及溢出——基于CoVaR方法的實(shí)證分析[J];北京工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

5 王長(zhǎng)江;;問(wèn)題類證券公司破產(chǎn)原因及處置方式研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2005年06期

6 周玲玲;;我國(guó)證券公司業(yè)務(wù)結(jié)構(gòu)的現(xiàn)狀[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2011年07期

7 萬(wàn)曉莉;董湘;;我國(guó)資本市場(chǎng)的系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其防范體系重構(gòu)[J];改革;2010年09期

8 張強(qiáng);馮超;;金融危機(jī)后我國(guó)上市商業(yè)銀行系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)測(cè)算[J];上海金融;2010年12期

9 高國(guó)華;潘英麗;;銀行系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度量——基于動(dòng)態(tài)CoVaR方法的分析[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年12期

10 劉曉星;段斌;謝福座;;股票市場(chǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溢出效應(yīng)研究:基于EVT-Copula-CoVaR模型的分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：1911218