本文關(guān)鍵詞： 住房保障 公共租賃住房 動態(tài)管理　出處：《中國海洋大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：當前，隨著3600萬套保障性住房的相繼建設(shè)與使用，我國住房保障邁入“建管并重”時期。完善其建設(shè)、分配、管理、退出等制度，制定公平合理、公開透明的保障性住房配租政策和監(jiān)管程序，嚴格規(guī)范準入、退出管理和租費標準，進而提升目標群體的社會福利水平，成為繼續(xù)推進住房保障健康發(fā)展的必然選擇。公共租賃住房是我國住房保障體系的重要組成部分，并將成為未來保障性住房建設(shè)的主體。公共租賃住房動態(tài)管理是指基于社會保障公平正義的目標，政府以及社會公眾對公共租賃住房規(guī)劃、建設(shè)、準入、退出以及績效評估的系統(tǒng)性、科學(xué)性管理過程。其本質(zhì)是調(diào)控目標群體的有序進入與退出，確保有限的公共租賃住房資源高效利用，做到“應(yīng)保盡保”。 盡管我國目前針對公租房的管理制度出臺了許多政策文件，但是在實踐過程中仍存在諸多問題亟待解決，主要包括：缺乏循環(huán)機制，，管理體系尚不完善；低收入家庭界定難；公平配租存在問題；動態(tài)監(jiān)管不到位；退出機制不健全等。造成上述問題存在的主要原因包括：立法工作滯后于住房保障事業(yè)的發(fā)展；尚未建立起全國層面統(tǒng)一的公共租賃住房信息化平臺；地方政府受短期利益影響，對公共租賃住房重視不夠；居民配合意識不高，存在投機傾向等。同時，為了更好的理解我國公共租賃住房管理存在的問題，特選取公共租賃住房準入管理中的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)—信息公示為案例，運用AHP層次分析法與綜合評分法，對我國十七個省會城市的住房保障網(wǎng)站信息公示的數(shù)據(jù)進行了量化評估。通過數(shù)據(jù)分析發(fā)現(xiàn)我國存在城市保障性住房信息公示水平整體較低、信息公示實施效果差距較大、公示的細節(jié)信息仍有待于進一步完善等問題。因此，為解決我國公共租賃住房管理存在的問題，應(yīng)當積極借鑒香港、新加坡等地先進的管理制度，總結(jié)其成功經(jīng)驗，再針對我國實際情況，得出建立健全我國公共租賃住房動態(tài)管理的對策，主要包括：健全公共租賃住房的法律制度；建立獎懲兼?zhèn)涞耐顺鰴C制；強化動態(tài)監(jiān)管；對地方政府公租房的管理成效進行績效考核；建立全國統(tǒng)一的公租房信息化管理平臺等。
[Abstract]:At present, with the successive construction and use of 36 million sets of affordable housing, China's housing security has entered a period of "equal emphasis on construction and management". It is necessary to perfect its construction, distribution, management, withdrawal and other systems and formulate a fair and reasonable system. Open and transparent rent allocation policies and regulatory procedures for affordable housing, strict regulation of access, withdrawal from management and rental fee standards, thereby raising the level of social welfare of the target group, Public rental housing is an important part of our housing security system. The dynamic management of public rental housing refers to the goal of social security fairness and justice, the government and the public planning, construction, access to public rental housing, The essence of withdrawal and the systematic and scientific management process of performance evaluation is to regulate the orderly entry and exit of the target group, to ensure the efficient use of limited public rental housing resources, and to ensure that "should be guaranteed to the best extent". Although China has issued many policy documents for the management system of public rental housing, there are still many problems to be solved in the process of practice, including: lack of circulation mechanism, imperfect management system, difficulty in defining low-income families; The main reasons for the above problems include: the legislative work lags behind the development of housing security; A unified information platform for public rental housing at the national level has not yet been established; local governments, affected by short-term interests, have not paid enough attention to public rental housing; the residents' awareness of cooperation is not high, and there is a tendency to speculate. At the same time, In order to better understand the problems existing in the management of public rental housing in China, this paper selects the key link in the management of public rental housing access-information publicity as a case, and applies AHP analytic hierarchy process and comprehensive scoring method. This paper evaluates quantitatively the data of information publication of housing security websites in 17 provincial capitals of our country. Through the analysis of the data, it is found that the level of information publicity of urban housing is relatively low in China, and the effect of information publicity is quite different. Therefore, in order to solve the problems existing in the management of public rental housing in China, we should actively learn from the advanced management systems in Hong Kong and Singapore, and sum up their successful experiences. According to the actual situation of our country, the countermeasures to establish and perfect the dynamic management of the public rental housing in our country are obtained, including: perfecting the legal system of the public rental housing; establishing the exiting mechanism with both rewards and punishments; strengthening the dynamic supervision; This paper evaluates the management effect of local government public rental housing and establishes a unified information management platform for public rental housing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F299.23;F832.49

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜金鋒;馮長春;;香港“夾心階層住屋計劃”經(jīng)驗借鑒[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2010年03期

2 馮科;;利用創(chuàng)新機制完善住房保障制度[J];城市開發(fā);2006年12期

3 文林峰;;發(fā)展公共租賃住房的現(xiàn)實意義和前景分析[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè);2009年10期

4 柯善北;;重視保障性住房的分配管理[J];中華建設(shè);2011年05期

5 魏麗艷;;保障性住房公平分配的準入退出機制研究[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2012年03期

6 馬平;;應(yīng)保盡保 應(yīng)退盡退 完善廉租住房動態(tài)管理機制[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè);2010年08期

7 徐俊;;廉租房的動態(tài)保障功能及其對法律調(diào)整的影響[J];湖州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年05期

8 陳柳欽;;完善城市基本住房保障制度的幾點思考[J];吉林工商學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期

9 謝東;趙澤洪;梁亞樨;;論公共行政決策的科學(xué)化——以AHP層次分析法為例[J];決策探索(上半月);2007年03期

10 郭江華;彭海紅;王海波;;公共租賃房:我國保障性住房供應(yīng)體系的核心[J];經(jīng)濟與管理;2012年06期

本文編號：1535020