本文關(guān)鍵詞：昆明市生產(chǎn)環(huán)節(jié)食品安全監(jiān)管研究　出處：《云南財經(jīng)大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 昆明市 食品生產(chǎn) 食品安全監(jiān)管

【摘要】：當前，我國食品生產(chǎn)企業(yè)數(shù)量龐大且數(shù)量還在激增，由于食品生產(chǎn)標準不全，法律約束不足，監(jiān)管效果不佳，風險交流滯后以及小企業(yè)檢測成本過高等問題，這使得一些食品生產(chǎn)商對于其食品安全的監(jiān)管消極應對。食品生產(chǎn)過程中通常都會使用添加劑，而部分企業(yè)非法添加或過量使用添加劑，給消費者生命安全造成了極大隱患。面對食品安全監(jiān)管的“內(nèi)憂外患”，，監(jiān)管形勢極其嚴峻。 根據(jù)黨的十八大會議精神，為進一步強化政府食品監(jiān)管能力，2013年全國啟動了機構(gòu)改革，對現(xiàn)行食品監(jiān)管部門職能進行了整合，為監(jiān)管部門更好的行使監(jiān)管職責創(chuàng)造了良好條件。2014年3月剛剛結(jié)束的十二屆全國人大二次會議上，“食品藥品安全”位列票選熱點問題前五位。李克強總理在政府工作報告中也指出：“嚴守法規(guī)和標準，用最嚴格的監(jiān)管、最嚴厲的處罰、最嚴肅的問責，堅決治理餐桌上的污染，切實保障‘舌尖上的安全’�！痹俅伪砻髁苏谥卫硎称钒踩珕栴}上的決心。 基于此背景，本文以昆明市為例，在參考和借鑒其他學者食品安全監(jiān)管成果的基礎上，運用文獻研究法、調(diào)查研究法與比較研究法，對昆明市生產(chǎn)環(huán)節(jié)食品安全監(jiān)管的現(xiàn)狀進行了調(diào)查研究，總結(jié)現(xiàn)有工作成果，分析現(xiàn)存問題，并依照我國其他先進城市對此的做法及其總結(jié)的經(jīng)驗教訓與啟示，從而加強對昆明市的食品安全監(jiān)管機制的提出，進而促進昆明市食品生產(chǎn)加工的規(guī)范發(fā)展；實施生產(chǎn)過程保險監(jiān)控進行生產(chǎn)風險監(jiān)控；鼓勵企業(yè)規(guī)�；�(jīng)營并劃定行業(yè)監(jiān)測大區(qū)以降低檢測成本；以網(wǎng)絡為載體加強新型聯(lián)動監(jiān)管機制建設實現(xiàn)量化分級監(jiān)管目標；加強誠信體系建設，引導生產(chǎn)企業(yè)樹立食品安全監(jiān)管主人翁意識等多條建議，試圖為昆明市未來監(jiān)管體制下針對食品生產(chǎn)加工過程的監(jiān)管規(guī)劃藍圖。
[Abstract]:At present, China's food production enterprises and the large number of the number is due to surge, food production standard is not complete, lack of legal constraints, regulatory effect is poor, the detection cost of risk communication lag and small businesses are too high, which makes some food producers for the food safety supervision negative coping. Usually the use of additives in food production in the process, and some companies illegally added or excessive use of additives, caused a great threat to the safety of the consumers. In the face of the food safety supervision, supervision of "domestic trouble and foreign invasion is very serious."
According to the eighteen meeting of the party spirit, to further strengthen the government food regulatory capacity, in 2013 the country launched a institutional reform, the current food regulatory functions were integrated for regulators to better exercise regulatory responsibilities to create good conditions for.2014 in March have just twelve National People's Congress of the two meeting of the bundles, "food problem drug safety ranked voting hot top five. Premier Li Keqiang pointed out in the government work report:" strict regulations and standards, with the most stringent regulation, the most severe punishment, the most serious accountability, pollution firmly on the table, and effectively protect the 'safety on the tongue'. "Once again that the government determination in the governance of food safety issues.
Based on this background, this paper takes Kunming city as an example, on the basis of reference to other scholars of food safety supervision results, using the literature research method, survey research method and comparative research method, investigated the status quo of Kunming city production of food safety supervision, summarizes the existing achievements, analyzing the existing problems, and in accordance with the other advanced city of our country in practice and summarizes the lessons and enlightenment, put forward to strengthen food safety supervision mechanism in Kunming City, and then promote the standardized development of food production and processing in Kunming city; the implementation of production process monitoring production insurance risk monitoring; encourage enterprises to large-scale operation and monitoring industry delineated areas to reduce detection the cost of the network as the carrier; strengthen the new joint monitoring mechanism construction to achieve quantitative classification of regulatory objectives; strengthen the construction of credit system, to guide the production of enterprises Establish a food safety supervision master consciousness and many of the recommendations for the supervision system, to the city of Kunming in the future of regulatory planning blueprint for the food production process.

【學位授予單位】：云南財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F203;F426.82

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓慶齡;;從主體角度規(guī)范和健全我國當前食品安全市場的對策研究[J];北方經(jīng)濟;2009年08期

2 魏華光;產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量適度監(jiān)管的若干原則和形式[J];質(zhì)量指南;2003年Z4期

3 阮興文;;關(guān)于公眾參與我國食品安全監(jiān)督管理的思考[J];黨政干部論壇;2009年05期

4 高云龍;;食品監(jiān)管,誰說了算[J];東北之窗;2010年18期

5 京信;誰來捍衛(wèi)食品安全鐡[J];城市質(zhì)量監(jiān)督;2003年01期

6 耿弘;童星;;從單一主體到多元參與——當前我國食品安全管制模式及其轉(zhuǎn)型[J];湖南師范大學社會科學學報;2009年03期

7 謝敏,于永達;對中國食品安全問題的分析[J];上海經(jīng)濟研究;2002年01期

8 劉亞平;;中國食品監(jiān)管體制:改革與挑戰(zhàn)[J];華中師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2009年04期

9 郝麗風,李莉;食品行業(yè)誠信缺失的經(jīng)濟學分析[J];經(jīng)濟與管理;2005年04期

10 王曉麗;李磊;;基于食品安全視角的食品企業(yè)社會責任淺析[J];價值工程;2009年11期

本文編號：1381305