本文關(guān)鍵詞：建筑核心企業(yè)供應(yīng)商關(guān)系成熟度模型應(yīng)用研究　出處：《重慶交通大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 建筑供應(yīng)鏈 核心企業(yè) 供應(yīng)商關(guān)系管理 能力成熟度模型 模糊綜合

【摘要】：隨著信息技術(shù)和交通運(yùn)輸業(yè)的發(fā)展，建筑業(yè)的區(qū)域性限制越來(lái)越小，建筑市場(chǎng)日益開(kāi)放，建筑行業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)也日趨激烈。作為建筑業(yè)的重要主體，承包商不但要直接面對(duì)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的壓力，還需面臨建筑材料價(jià)格上漲，以及業(yè)主針對(duì)建設(shè)工期、施工質(zhì)量、資金支付、結(jié)算審計(jì)等方面的苛刻要求。盡管上個(gè)世紀(jì)80年代末，建筑行業(yè)引入了供應(yīng)鏈管理，在一定程度上改變了粗放的傳統(tǒng)管理方式，有效改善了建筑行業(yè)的生產(chǎn)效率，對(duì)提高承包商的成本競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)起到了一定的促進(jìn)作用。但實(shí)踐表明，建筑業(yè)供應(yīng)商關(guān)系管理的一般原理、評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系等還不盡完善，其價(jià)值與作用尚未得到廣泛認(rèn)知，特別是對(duì)提高承包商成本競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)的作用還未充分顯現(xiàn)，這也是多數(shù)建筑核心企業(yè)，并未能夠與供應(yīng)商建立并保持長(zhǎng)期的現(xiàn)代供應(yīng)商關(guān)系的重要原因。加強(qiáng)供應(yīng)商關(guān)系管理理論研究與實(shí)踐探索，對(duì)改善建筑業(yè)市場(chǎng)主體協(xié)作關(guān)系，提高承包商市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力，促進(jìn)行業(yè)健康有序發(fā)展，具有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義�；诖�，本文提出了建筑核心企業(yè)供應(yīng)商關(guān)系管理，并采用成熟度的觀點(diǎn)對(duì)供應(yīng)商關(guān)系管理進(jìn)行量化研究，主要內(nèi)容包括： ①對(duì)建筑供應(yīng)商關(guān)系相關(guān)理論以及能力成熟度模型進(jìn)行綜述，重點(diǎn)分析了現(xiàn)有成熟度關(guān)系評(píng)價(jià)模型的不足，包括如何進(jìn)行評(píng)估、供應(yīng)商關(guān)系水平定義以及結(jié)果如何展示等問(wèn)題。 ②基于CMM理念，對(duì)建筑業(yè)供應(yīng)商關(guān)系進(jìn)行層次分析，將其劃分為傳統(tǒng)的買賣關(guān)系、有限的合作關(guān)系、短期的協(xié)作關(guān)系和長(zhǎng)期的合作關(guān)系4個(gè)層次，前2個(gè)層次反映傳統(tǒng)的對(duì)立關(guān)系，后2個(gè)層次反映協(xié)作關(guān)系。 ③構(gòu)建從信任、目標(biāo)、協(xié)作、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分擔(dān)、溝通、采購(gòu)、解決問(wèn)題和可持續(xù)發(fā)展8個(gè)維度，24個(gè)二級(jí)指標(biāo)的評(píng)價(jià)體系。以此為基礎(chǔ)，結(jié)合4個(gè)關(guān)系層次以及評(píng)價(jià)準(zhǔn)則，運(yùn)用模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法量化合作關(guān)系程度，，從而建立起了完整的成熟度模型。 ④以重慶中央公園項(xiàng)目建設(shè)作為研究對(duì)象，對(duì)業(yè)主單位重慶中央公園建設(shè)發(fā)展有限公司與其石材供應(yīng)商山東承隆集團(tuán)之間的合作關(guān)系運(yùn)用模型計(jì)算，結(jié)果為2.5，介于有限的合作關(guān)系和短期的協(xié)作關(guān)系之間，表明雙方的合作關(guān)系成熟度水平還不夠高，與實(shí)際相符合，據(jù)此佐證模型的有效性。
[Abstract]:With the development of information technology and transportation industry, the regional restrictions of the construction industry are becoming smaller and smaller, the construction market is opening up day by day, and the competition in the construction industry is becoming increasingly fierce. The contractor has to face not only the pressure of market competition, but also the rising price of construction materials, as well as the owner of the construction period, construction quality, capital payments. Although in the end of -20s, the construction industry introduced supply chain management, to some extent, changed the extensive traditional management. It can effectively improve the production efficiency of the construction industry and promote the cost competitive advantage of contractors. However, the practice shows that the general principle of supplier relationship management in construction industry. Evaluation index system is not perfect, its value and role has not been widely recognized, especially the role of improving the contractor's cost competitive advantage has not been fully revealed, this is also the majority of core construction enterprises. The important reason why we can not establish and maintain long-term modern supplier relationship with suppliers. Strengthen the theoretical research and practical exploration of supplier relationship management to improve the cooperative relationship of the main body in the construction market. It is of practical significance to improve the contractors' market competitiveness and promote the healthy and orderly development of the industry. Based on this, this paper puts forward the management of supplier relationship in the construction core enterprises. The quantitative research on supplier relationship management is carried out from the viewpoint of maturity. The main contents are as follows: 1. Summarize the theory of building supplier relationship and capability maturity model, and focus on the analysis of the shortcomings of the existing maturity relationship evaluation model, including how to evaluate. The definition of supplier relationship level and how to display the results. 2 based on the concept of CMM, the relationship of suppliers in construction industry is divided into four levels: traditional business relationship, limited cooperative relationship, short-term cooperative relationship and long-term cooperative relationship. The first two levels reflect the traditional opposites and the latter two reflect the cooperative relations. (3) to build an evaluation system based on 8 dimensions of trust, goal, collaboration, risk sharing, communication, procurement, problem solving and sustainable development, and 24 secondary indicators. Combined with the four levels of relationship and the evaluation criteria, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to quantify the degree of cooperation relationship, and a complete maturity model is established. (4) taking the construction of Chongqing Central Park Project as the research object, the cooperation relationship between Chongqing Central Park Construction and Development Co., Ltd and its stone supplier Shandong Chenglong Group is calculated by using the model. The result is 2.5, which is between the limited cooperative relationship and the short-term cooperative relationship, which indicates that the maturity level of the cooperative relationship between the two sides is not high enough, which is consistent with the actual situation, which proves the validity of the model.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F426.92;F274;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 蔣明榮;楊曉明;;加強(qiáng)工程項(xiàng)目供應(yīng)商關(guān)系管理是降低材料采購(gòu)成本有效途徑[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年21期

2 王要武,鄭寶才;建筑供應(yīng)鏈合作伙伴選擇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的研究[J];低溫建筑技術(shù);2004年04期

3 聞敬謙,李青;企業(yè)供應(yīng)鏈中供應(yīng)商管理系統(tǒng)研究與實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];計(jì)算機(jī)工程與應(yīng)用;2004年08期

4 宋艷華,金維興,張文榮;基于供應(yīng)鏈管理的建筑企業(yè)核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力分析[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年12期

5 ;問(wèn)題工作室[J];經(jīng)理人;2000年01期

6 王要武,薛小龍;供應(yīng)鏈管理在建筑業(yè)的應(yīng)用研究[J];土木工程學(xué)報(bào);2004年09期

7 楊智璇;;建筑項(xiàng)目分包商與合作伙伴關(guān)系[J];項(xiàng)目管理技術(shù);2008年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 譚元戎;溶入目的論元素的知識(shí)型營(yíng)銷人員能力成熟度評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];南京理工大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1367018