本文選題：互聯(lián)網(wǎng) + 壟斷行為��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為逐漸成為反壟斷司法規(guī)制的焦點(diǎn)。網(wǎng)絡(luò)外部性、消費(fèi)者鎖定效應(yīng)、雙邊市場(chǎng)等互聯(lián)網(wǎng)特征使互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為的認(rèn)定具有復(fù)雜性,給司法規(guī)制活動(dòng)帶來(lái)了巨大挑戰(zhàn)。目前,對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制問(wèn)題的研究常見(jiàn)于規(guī)范分析,且研究?jī)?nèi)容主要集中在相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定、市場(chǎng)支配地位認(rèn)定以及濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位判定等問(wèn)題,鮮有專(zhuān)門(mén)針對(duì)該類(lèi)案件司法裁判文書(shū)進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究之范例。基于此,本文以實(shí)證研究方法對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究,以15份司法裁判文書(shū)為研究樣本,通過(guò)對(duì)研究樣本進(jìn)行頻次、對(duì)比等定量分析,對(duì)我國(guó)目前互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制相關(guān)問(wèn)題展開(kāi)全面研究。文章除引言、結(jié)論外,主要由以下四部分構(gòu)成:第一部分:實(shí)證研究樣本及設(shè)計(jì)說(shuō)明。首先,對(duì)本文研究樣本的選取與獲取進(jìn)行說(shuō)明;其次,對(duì)研究樣本基本內(nèi)容作簡(jiǎn)要概述;最后,闡述實(shí)證定量分析所需變量的設(shè)計(jì)與運(yùn)用。第二部分:互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀的實(shí)證考察。將案件司法裁判文書(shū)所反饋的信息分為三類(lèi):審判基本情況、涉嫌違法壟斷行為表現(xiàn)及認(rèn)定情況以及其他司法規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀情況說(shuō)明。對(duì)三類(lèi)信息進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)歸納,展示互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀考察的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)果。第三部分:互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制的問(wèn)題及原因。實(shí)證發(fā)現(xiàn),我國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制的主要問(wèn)題表現(xiàn)為:傳統(tǒng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)部門(mén)壟斷現(xiàn)象未得到有效規(guī)制,新興互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)壟斷行為難以認(rèn)定以及涉外互聯(lián)網(wǎng)壟斷行為在我國(guó)得不到制裁。其原因在于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)反壟斷法律體系不健全、法院缺乏案件審判經(jīng)驗(yàn)、原被告法律地位不對(duì)等以及互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)性問(wèn)題難以應(yīng)對(duì)四方面。第四部分:互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制的完善。提出以公平、合理、經(jīng)濟(jì)效率優(yōu)先、審慎以及公共利益作為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制的指導(dǎo)原則。建議通過(guò)以下路徑解決互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為的司法規(guī)制困境:完善互聯(lián)網(wǎng)反壟斷法律法規(guī)體系、彌補(bǔ)法律漏洞;強(qiáng)化審判組織建設(shè)、逐步提升司法審判專(zhuān)業(yè)素養(yǎng);構(gòu)建公平合理舉證責(zé)任制度、矯正失衡的訴辯格局;采用綜合行為認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、化解技術(shù)性審判障礙。除此之外,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制仍需注意把握規(guī)制力度防止司法能動(dòng)過(guò)度、平衡司法規(guī)制與政策性保護(hù)以促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展以及科學(xué)適用豁免制度以激勵(lì)行業(yè)創(chuàng)新。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the development of Internet economy, monopoly behavior in Internet field has gradually become the focus of anti-monopoly judicial regulation. The characteristics of Internet such as network externality, consumer locking effect, bilateral market and so on make the identification of monopoly behavior in the field of Internet complicated and bring great challenges to the judicial regulation activities. At present, the research on the judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in the field of Internet is usually based on normative analysis, and the research mainly focuses on the definition of relevant markets, the determination of market dominant position and the determination of abuse of market dominant position, etc. There are few examples of empirical research on judicial adjudication documents of this kind of cases. Based on this, this paper uses the empirical research method to study the judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in the field of Internet, taking 15 judicial decision documents as the research sample, through the quantitative analysis of frequency, contrast and so on. This paper makes a comprehensive study on the judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in the Internet field in China. Besides the introduction and conclusion, the paper consists of the following four parts: the first part: empirical research sample and design explanation. First of all, the selection and acquisition of the research sample is explained; secondly, the basic content of the research sample is briefly summarized; finally, the design and application of the variables needed for empirical quantitative analysis are expounded. The second part: an empirical study on the current situation of judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in the Internet field. The information received from the judicial decision documents is divided into three categories: the basic situation of trial, the behavior of suspected illegal monopoly and its cognizance, and the explanation of the current situation of other judicial regulations. This paper summarizes the three kinds of information and shows the results of the investigation on the current situation of judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in the field of Internet. The third part: the problems and reasons of judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in Internet field. It is found that the main problems in the judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in China's Internet field are that the monopoly phenomenon in the traditional Internet sector has not been effectively regulated. The monopoly behavior of emerging Internet enterprises is difficult to identify and foreign Internet monopoly behavior can not be sanctioned in our country. The reasons are that the legal system of Internet antimonopoly is not perfect, the court lacks the trial experience of cases, the legal status of the original defendant is not equal, and the technical problems of Internet are difficult to deal with in four aspects. The fourth part: the perfection of judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in Internet field. Fair, reasonable, economic efficiency first, prudence and public interest are the guiding principles of judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in the field of Internet. It is suggested that the following ways should be adopted to solve the dilemma of judicial regulation in the field of Internet monopoly: to perfect the legal system of Internet antitrust, to make up for the legal loophole, to strengthen the construction of trial organization, and to gradually improve the professional accomplishment of judicial trial; The system of fair and reasonable burden of proof should be constructed to correct the imbalance of litigation, and the standard of comprehensive behavior should be adopted to resolve the technical obstacles of trial. In addition, the judicial regulation of monopoly behavior in the field of Internet still needs to grasp the regulation to prevent excessive judicial initiative, to balance judicial regulation with policy protection to promote the development of industry and to promote the scientific application of exemption system in order to stimulate innovation in the industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;聚焦互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域“國(guó)進(jìn)民退”[J];中國(guó)智庫(kù);2011年02期

2 董文兵;;大力加強(qiáng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域的執(zhí)政能力建設(shè)[J];中共云南省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

3 ;名刊摘要[J];信息化建設(shè);2011年12期

4 ;中國(guó)今年將對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域侵權(quán)假冒進(jìn)行重點(diǎn)部署[J];信息與電腦(理論版);2013年12期

5 趙玉林;;處理互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域人權(quán)保障困境的理論基礎(chǔ)探析——兼談協(xié)商權(quán)利論的優(yōu)越性[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2014年06期

6 ;熱點(diǎn)研究[J];中國(guó)智庫(kù);2011年02期

7 陳際紅;外資投資互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域的法律問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)律師;2001年07期

8 甄靜慧;;視聽(tīng)網(wǎng)站大整頓的利益鏈條[J];南風(fēng)窗;2010年01期

9 周春慧;;三百鏖戰(zhàn)搜索市場(chǎng) 法律遠(yuǎn)比激情殘酷[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年Z1期

10 邢少文;;財(cái)經(jīng)資訊盤(pán)點(diǎn)[J];南風(fēng)窗;2011年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 陳飛;;微視頻網(wǎng)站運(yùn)作研究[A];新媒體：競(jìng)合與共贏[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)記者 吳瑜琦;我省將重點(diǎn)打擊互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域侵權(quán)假冒[N];安徽經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2014年

2 本報(bào)記者 侯捷寧;全國(guó)社�；穑嚎春没ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域投資[N];證券日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

3 李中朝;發(fā)揮主流新聞信息在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域的作用[N];人民郵電;2007年

4 ;再議美國(guó)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域控制權(quán)問(wèn)題[N];人民郵電;2006年

5 商報(bào)記者 曉雪;移動(dòng)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域的微創(chuàng)新[N];中國(guó)圖書(shū)商報(bào);2011年

6 本報(bào)記者 凡曉芝;中軟國(guó)際和掌中無(wú)限誰(shuí)是誰(shuí)的救命稻草？[N];計(jì)算機(jī)世界;2010年

7 總編輯 董凱虹;少些浮躁[N];計(jì)算機(jī)世界;2006年

8 ;清華大學(xué)博士生導(dǎo)師李星：IPv6將營(yíng)造更好創(chuàng)新環(huán)境[N];人民郵電;2010年

9 楊軼清;如果阿里巴巴不在浙江[N];經(jīng)理日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

10 本報(bào)記者 龔丹韻;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)為何速生又速死[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張莉;企業(yè)流程審批移動(dòng)平臺(tái)設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];華僑大學(xué);2015年

2 宋琳;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域壟斷行為司法規(guī)制的實(shí)證研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2016年

3 李倩;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域中相關(guān)市場(chǎng)的法律界定研究[D];安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2058516