本文選題：印度 + 反傾銷　； 參考：《貴州財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來,特別是加入WTO之后,我國出口貿(mào)易保持高速增長(zhǎng),已成為世界上第一大貿(mào)易國。但是伴隨而來的國際貿(mào)易摩擦也在不斷增加,我國是當(dāng)今世界上遭受反傾銷調(diào)查最多、受害最嚴(yán)重的國家之一。根據(jù)WTO反傾銷數(shù)據(jù)庫統(tǒng)計(jì)顯示,1995—2015年,我國共遭受1123起反傾銷調(diào)查,其中有820起采取了反傾銷措施。美國和歐盟多次運(yùn)用反傾銷手段限制中國產(chǎn)品的進(jìn)口,給中國企業(yè)帶來巨大損失。不僅如此,這種態(tài)勢(shì)還蔓延到發(fā)展中國家,其中印度已連續(xù)多年成為對(duì)中國企業(yè)實(shí)施反傾銷調(diào)查最多的國家。頻繁的反傾銷行為已違背WTO建立這項(xiàng)規(guī)則的初衷,反傾銷淪為貿(mào)易保護(hù)的手段,損害了中國企業(yè)的正當(dāng)利益,也不利于全球貿(mào)易的自由化發(fā)展。當(dāng)前,我國企業(yè)對(duì)美國、歐盟等發(fā)達(dá)國家的反傾銷調(diào)查應(yīng)訴率較高,積累了比較豐富的經(jīng)驗(yàn),而對(duì)發(fā)展中國家的反傾銷研究較少,應(yīng)訴率和勝訴率都偏低。本文以印度對(duì)華反傾銷問題為研究對(duì)象,從定量和定性兩個(gè)方面來深入研究印度對(duì)華反傾銷的原因,并給出對(duì)策建議,這對(duì)減少我國企業(yè)對(duì)印貿(mào)易損失,維護(hù)我國企業(yè)的正當(dāng)利益具有非常重要的意義。本文首先對(duì)印度反傾銷所依據(jù)的法律法規(guī)以及反傾銷程序進(jìn)行分析,使中國企業(yè)能清楚知道印度的反傾銷流程。然后,研究當(dāng)前印度反傾銷的基本情況,從反傾銷力度、被調(diào)查行業(yè)、反傾銷稅的征收等幾個(gè)方面總結(jié)印度對(duì)華反傾銷的特征。其次,從國際背景、印度國內(nèi)背景和中國國內(nèi)背景三個(gè)方面對(duì)印度對(duì)華反傾銷的原因進(jìn)行理論分析。再次,選取影響印度對(duì)華反傾銷的宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)因素進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,得出印度對(duì)華反傾銷的力度與宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)因素的關(guān)系。最后,從中國政府、行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)和企業(yè)三個(gè)層面給出針對(duì)性對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, especially after China's entry into WTO, China's export trade has maintained a rapid growth, and has become the largest trading country in the world. However, the international trade frictions are also increasing. China is one of the countries suffering the most anti-dumping investigation and the most serious injury. According to the statistics of WTO anti-dumping database, from 1995 to 2015, China was subjected to 1123 anti-dumping investigations, of which 820 had taken anti-dumping measures. The United States and the European Union have repeatedly used anti-dumping measures to restrict imports of Chinese products, causing huge losses to Chinese enterprises. Not only this, but also spread to developing countries, including India has been the most anti-dumping investigation of Chinese enterprises for many years. The frequent antidumping acts have violated the original intention of the WTO to establish this rule. Antidumping has been reduced to the means of trade protection, which has harmed the legitimate interests of Chinese enterprises and is not conducive to the development of global trade liberalization. At present, the anti-dumping investigation response rate of Chinese enterprises to the developed countries such as the United States and the European Union is relatively high, and they have accumulated rich experience, while the anti-dumping research on the developing countries is less, the response rate and the successful rate are on the low side. This paper takes India's anti-dumping against China as the object of study, studies the causes of India's anti-dumping against China from both quantitative and qualitative aspects, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions, which will reduce the trade losses of Chinese enterprises against India. It is of great significance to safeguard the legitimate interests of Chinese enterprises. This paper first analyzes the laws and regulations and the procedure of anti-dumping in India, so that Chinese enterprises can clearly know the anti-dumping process of India. Then, the paper studies the basic situation of India's anti-dumping at present, summarizes the characteristics of India's anti-dumping against China from several aspects, such as the intensity of anti-dumping, the industry under investigation, the collection of anti-dumping duties, and so on. Secondly, from the international background, the domestic background of India and the domestic background of China, the causes of India's anti-dumping against China are analyzed theoretically. Thirdly, we choose the macroeconomic factors that affect India's anti-dumping against China, and draw the conclusion of the relationship between the intensity of India's anti-dumping against China and macroeconomic factors. Finally, from the Chinese government, industry associations and enterprises three levels to give targeted countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F741.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李啟紅;;印度反傾銷法關(guān)于傾銷確定的分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2013年33期

2 郭杰;;美國對(duì)華反傾銷的宏觀成因研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2013年10期

3 王孝松;謝申祥;;發(fā)展中大國間貿(mào)易摩擦的微觀形成機(jī)制——以印度對(duì)華反傾銷為例[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年09期

4 王晰;;印度對(duì)華反傾銷行為的驅(qū)動(dòng)因素分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2011年10期

5 顏海明;唐美榮;;1994-2008年印度對(duì)華反傾銷實(shí)踐定量分析[J];南亞研究季刊;2010年03期

6 高維新;;歐盟對(duì)華反傾銷的經(jīng)濟(jì)影響及對(duì)策分析[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2010年05期

7 楊勵(lì);;歐盟對(duì)華反傾銷與中國的應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];國際貿(mào)易;2008年04期

8 鄧慶;;現(xiàn)階段印度對(duì)華反傾銷的實(shí)踐特點(diǎn)及對(duì)策[J];黑龍江對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2007年07期

9 余菲;;論美國對(duì)華反傾銷的不公平性及因應(yīng)策略[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年05期

10 周灝;;印度對(duì)華反傾銷的特點(diǎn)及原因研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2007年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊啟;印度對(duì)華反傾銷對(duì)我國企業(yè)的影響和對(duì)策研究[D];山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

2 孔嘉文;美國對(duì)華反傾銷研究[D];貴州財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

3 徐亮;關(guān)于美國對(duì)華反傾銷原因的實(shí)證性分析[D];華東師范大學(xué);2013年

4 劉強(qiáng);印度反傾銷法研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2049620