發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-16 05:10

  本文選題：講話稿 + “把”字句��； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：漢語“把”字句的基本語法意義是表示處置,這種功能與人類對(duì)世界的干預(yù)緊密契合,因此,這種句式能廣泛應(yīng)用于各種語體。目前漢語語法學(xué)界對(duì)于“把”字句句法語義語用特點(diǎn)及規(guī)律的研究,多以文藝語體的作品為主要語料,但這種研究所得出的一些規(guī)律、認(rèn)識(shí)不一定適用于其他語體。比如公文經(jīng)常需要表達(dá)對(duì)事物、事件的處理意見和方案,這種語用意圖使得“把”字句成為這種語體中的高頻句式之一。但目前以公文語料來觀察“把”字句應(yīng)用規(guī)律的學(xué)者更是寥寥無幾,已有的研究也相對(duì)顯得粗略。因此,我們以政論語體語料為基礎(chǔ),觀察公文中“把”字句的應(yīng)用規(guī)律,對(duì)于公文語言研究既有理論價(jià)值又有實(shí)踐意義。本論文以最高國家領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人的講話稿為語料基礎(chǔ),共選取講話稿中1640例“把”字句,以漢語語體語法理論、功能語法與認(rèn)知語法理論為指導(dǎo),對(duì)講話稿中“把”字句的特點(diǎn)、規(guī)律及成因進(jìn)行了探討。本論文共分為六個(gè)部分:第一部分為緒論,對(duì)講話稿及“把”字句的研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了概述,并簡要介紹了創(chuàng)新的突破口及理論依據(jù)、研究方法。第二部分是對(duì)相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行界定,概述了講話稿的定義、分類及“把”字句的研究范圍。第三部分對(duì)國家領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人講話稿中“把”字句的分布頻率進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì),得出講話稿中“把”字句出現(xiàn)頻率較高,其中作分句的“把”字句出現(xiàn)頻率最高且多處于并列復(fù)句中,還有一部分處在假設(shè)復(fù)句和條件復(fù)句中,并從語用焦點(diǎn)和鮮明的表意要求的契合、語用功能和表達(dá)指令的講話意圖的契合、篇章銜接和論題集中的契合、嚴(yán)密有序的邏輯性要求這幾個(gè)方面分析了成因。第四部分分別對(duì)講話稿中“把”字句的主語、狀語、“把”字賓語、謂語成分進(jìn)行分類統(tǒng)計(jì),得出“把”字句的主語多為名詞性成分,并從篇章功能、經(jīng)濟(jì)原則、心理趨同幾個(gè)方面分析了成因;“把”字句的狀語多為空位狀語,能愿動(dòng)詞和副詞也占了一部分比例,并從語用視點(diǎn)、語義和諧方面來分析成因;“把”字賓語多為名詞及名詞性短語,動(dòng)詞及動(dòng)詞性短語也占了一部分比例,并從處置對(duì)象有定化的需求、指稱預(yù)設(shè)和關(guān)系預(yù)設(shè)的需求方面來分析成因;“把”字句的謂語成分多為“動(dòng)詞+賓語”,“動(dòng)詞+補(bǔ)語”的謂語成分也占了相當(dāng)比例,并從加重句尾信息、配合語體色彩方面來分析成因。第五部分是將文藝語體與講話稿中“把”字句的特點(diǎn)及規(guī)律做對(duì)比,分析其相異之處。第六部分是根據(jù)該文總結(jié)的講話稿中“把”字句的特點(diǎn)及規(guī)律,對(duì)講話稿中“把”字句的實(shí)際運(yùn)用提出了三點(diǎn)借鑒建議。第七部分是結(jié)論,進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的總結(jié),并指出本論文研究的長處和短處,并對(duì)研究前景進(jìn)行了展望。綜上,本論文選取政論語體中的講話稿作為基本語料,來初步作語體語法范疇的嘗試性研究,描寫特定語體中的“把”字句在整體、局部等不同方面的各種特征,試圖以“把”字句為切入點(diǎn),觀察政論語體的某一具體語言運(yùn)用情況并探尋其中原因。
[Abstract]:The basic grammatical meaning of the Chinese "Ba" sentence is expressed as disposition, which is closely related to human intervention in the world. Therefore, this sentence pattern can be widely used in various languages. Some of the rules of the study are not necessarily applicable to other languages. For example, a document often needs to express ideas and schemes for dealing with things and events. This pragmatic intention makes "put" sentences into one of the high frequency sentences in this type of language. There are few, and the existing research is relatively rough. Therefore, we use the political Analects as the basis, to observe the rules of the application of "the" words in the official documents, and have both theoretical and practical significance for the study of the language of the public documents. This paper takes the speeches of the highest national leaders as the basis of the speech, and selects 1640 cases in the speech draft. With the guidance of the Chinese stylistic grammar theory, functional grammar and cognitive grammar theory, this paper discusses the characteristics, rules and causes of the "Ba" sentences in the speech. The thesis is divided into six parts: the first part is the introduction, summarizing the research status of the speech and the "the" words, and briefly introducing the breakthrough point of the innovation. The second part is to define the relevant concepts, summarize the definition of the speech, the classification and the scope of the study of "the" words. The third part makes a statistics on the frequency of the distribution of "the" words in the speech draft of the state leaders, and draws a conclusion that "the" words in the speech are higher in frequency, in which the clauses are divided. There are some parts in the compound sentence with the highest frequency and more in the complex sentence. There are some parts in the hypothetical complex sentence and the conditional compound sentence, and the agreement between the pragmatic focus and the distinct ideographic requirements, the correspondence of the speech intention of the pragmatic function and the expression instruction, the connection of the text connection and the topic concentration, the strict and orderly logical requirement. The fourth part analyzes the subject, adverbial, object and predicate in the speech, and concludes that the subject of "the" sentence is mostly noun, and the cause is divided from the text function, the economic principle and the psychological convergence, and the adverbials of "the" words are mostly empty adverbials. The verb and adverb also account for a part of the proportion, and analyze the causes from the pragmatic perspective and the semantic harmony. "The" word object is mostly nouns and noun phrases, verbs and verb phrases also account for a part of the proportion, and analyze the causes from the needs of the disposed object, the presupposition and the requirement of the relationship presupposition. The predicate components of the sentence are mostly "Verb + object", and the predicate component of "Verb + complement" also accounts for a considerable proportion, and analyzes the causes from the end information of the aggravated sentence and the style color. The fifth part is to compare the characteristics and laws of the literary and artistic styles with the rules of "the" words in the speech manuscript, and analyze their differences. The sixth part is the basis for the analysis. This article summarizes the characteristics and rules of "the" words in the speech, and puts forward three suggestions for the practical use of "the" words in the speech. The seventh part is a conclusion, a systematic summary, and points out the strengths and weaknesses of the study and the prospect of the research. As the basic corpus, the manuscript is a tentative study of the grammatical category of the language. It describes the various features of the word "the" word in the whole, local and other aspects in a particular style, trying to take "the" word as the breakthrough point to observe the application of a specific language in the political discourse and explore the reasons for it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐峰;;“把NP一V”的句法、語義和語用功能[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2014年04期

2 朱軍;;漢語語體語法研究綜述[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2012年05期

3 趙宏;“把”字句的語用分析[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年04期

4 曹廣順;龍國富;;再談中古漢語處置式[J];中國語文;2005年04期

5 胡文澤;也談“把”字句的語法意義[J];語言研究;2005年02期

6 葉向陽;;“把”字句的致使性解釋[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2004年02期

7 王紅旗;“把”字句的意義究竟是什么[J];語文研究;2003年02期

8 徐烈炯;;漢語是話語概念結(jié)構(gòu)化語言嗎?[J];中國語文;2002年05期

9 沈家煊;;如何處置“處置式”?——論把字句的主觀性[J];中國語文;2002年05期

10 張寶林;關(guān)系動(dòng)詞的鑒定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];語言教學(xué)與研究;2002年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2025463