本文選題：創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè) + 政策績效��； 參考：《華北水利水電大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：為了實(shí)現(xiàn)提高就業(yè)率、增加居民收入的目標(biāo),黨的"十八大"上提出了 "大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)、萬眾創(chuàng)新"這一舉措。國務(wù)院2015年6月發(fā)布的《關(guān)于大力推進(jìn)大眾創(chuàng)業(yè)萬眾創(chuàng)新若干政策措施的意見》中的統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)表明,我國總?cè)丝谝殉?3億,其中勞動力占總?cè)丝诘钠叱伞Ｃ磕甏罅扛咝．厴I(yè)生、農(nóng)村剩余勞動力等勞動群體涌入就業(yè)市場,目前我國人力資源充足,人力資本可觀,與之矛盾的是嚴(yán)峻的就業(yè)形勢。近幾年,我國正處于經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型期,社會就業(yè)壓力日益增大,但我們不難發(fā)現(xiàn)創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)的影響力在明顯增大,逐漸成為我國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的新動力。為了更好的支持鼓勵創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)進(jìn)一步發(fā)展,國家和地方各級政府相繼出臺了一系列促進(jìn)創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)的政策�？偟膩碚f,這些政策的實(shí)施在一定程度上取得了成效,但由于地區(qū)的差異性,各地所出臺的政策在內(nèi)容上和力度上都有較大不同,政策實(shí)施的實(shí)際效果也存在較大差異。就此來看,如何對創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)政策實(shí)施績效做出科學(xué)評價已經(jīng)成為目前急需解決的問題。這些年來,政策評價成為世界公共管理學(xué)界研究的一大熱點(diǎn),但是,目前國內(nèi)外仍較缺乏單獨(dú)針對創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)政策的績效評價的研究。在本文中,對創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)政策實(shí)施績效的評價采用層次分析法將定量描述與定性分析相結(jié)合,再根據(jù)我國國情,構(gòu)建創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)政策評價指標(biāo)體系和模型。首先,本文查閱了大量國內(nèi)外文獻(xiàn),對我國的創(chuàng)業(yè)與就業(yè)、國內(nèi)外創(chuàng)業(yè)政策與就業(yè)政策以及政策績效評價的相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行了總結(jié)分析,初步形成論文的研究思路。確定政策評價標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和評價模式后,從政策制定的必要性、政策體系的科學(xué)性、決策程序的完整性、政策認(rèn)同度、政策的執(zhí)行度、政策目標(biāo)實(shí)現(xiàn)度、政策效應(yīng)、政策效率、政策滿意度九個方面對創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)政策實(shí)施績效評價體系進(jìn)行了框架界定。在查閱相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)完成指標(biāo)選取后,本文將運(yùn)用企業(yè)訪談和專家調(diào)查法對評價指標(biāo)進(jìn)行篩選和完善,以此建立起由3級22個評價指標(biāo)構(gòu)成的創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)政策實(shí)施績效評價指標(biāo)體系。接著,本文在建立起的指標(biāo)體系的基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)一步建立起了創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)政策實(shí)施績效的評價模型。為了保證評價結(jié)果的科學(xué)性和實(shí)踐性,本文將以模糊綜合評價的方法,將定量與定性指標(biāo)的賦值與評分進(jìn)行有機(jī)統(tǒng)一。在定量和定性指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)的獲取上,通過文獻(xiàn)統(tǒng)計(jì)和問卷調(diào)查的方法,完成模型各指標(biāo)評分及總評分的計(jì)算,從而對模型的實(shí)際效果作出評價。最后,本文總結(jié)了創(chuàng)業(yè)帶動就業(yè)政策評價結(jié)論中存在的問題,進(jìn)而提出建議和對策。
[Abstract]:In order to achieve the goal of increasing employment rate and increasing residents' income, the Party's "Eighteenth National Congress" put forward the action of "mass entrepreneurship, mass innovation". The statistics in "opinions on several policies and measures to promote Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation" released by the State Council in June 2015 show that the total population of our country has exceeded 1.3 billion, of which the labor force accounts for 70% of the total population. Every year, a large number of college graduates, rural surplus labor force and other labor groups pour into the employment market. At present, our country has sufficient human resources and considerable human capital, which is contradictory to the severe employment situation. In recent years, our country is in the economic structure transition period, the social employment pressure is increasing day by day, but we can easily find that the influence of starting a business to promote the employment is obviously increasing, and gradually becomes the new power of our country's economic development. In order to better support and encourage the further development of entrepreneurship and employment, the national and local governments have issued a series of policies to promote entrepreneurship and employment. Generally speaking, the implementation of these policies has achieved some results to a certain extent, but due to the regional differences, the content and strength of the policies are different, and the actual effect of policy implementation is also different. From this point of view, how to make a scientific evaluation of the performance of entrepreneurship-led employment policy has become an urgent problem. In recent years, policy evaluation has become a hot topic in the field of public management in the world. However, there is still a lack of research on the performance evaluation of entrepreneurship-led employment policy at home and abroad. In this paper, the performance evaluation of entrepreneurship-led employment policy using AHP to combine quantitative description with qualitative analysis, and then according to the situation of our country, the evaluation index system and model of entrepreneurship-led employment policy are constructed First of all, this paper reviews a large number of domestic and foreign literature on entrepreneurship and employment, entrepreneurship policies and employment policies at home and abroad, as well as policy performance evaluation of the relevant studies were summarized and analyzed, the preliminary formation of the research ideas of the paper. After the policy evaluation criteria and evaluation models are determined, the necessity of policy formulation, the scientific nature of the policy system, the integrity of the decision-making process, the degree of policy identification, the degree of policy implementation, the degree of policy goal realization, the policy effect, the policy efficiency, This paper defines the performance evaluation system of entrepreneurship-led employment policy implementation in nine aspects of policy satisfaction. After consulting the relevant literature to select the indicators, this paper will use the method of enterprise interview and expert investigation to screen and improve the evaluation index. In this way, a performance evaluation index system of employment policy implementation is established, which is composed of 22 evaluation indexes of level 3. Then, on the basis of establishing the index system, this paper further establishes the evaluation model of the performance of entrepreneurship-led employment policy implementation. In order to ensure the scientific and practical nature of the evaluation results, this paper organically unifies the assignment and evaluation of quantitative and qualitative indexes by the method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. In terms of obtaining quantitative and qualitative index data, through the methods of literature statistics and questionnaire survey, the calculation of each index score and total score of the model is completed, and the actual effect of the model is evaluated. Finally, this paper summarizes the problems in the evaluation of entrepreneurship-led employment policy, and then puts forward some suggestions and countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北水利水電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F224;F249.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 趙莉;周夢瀾;程文建;朱傳紅;;公共政策的精英化與回應(yīng)度之間的關(guān)系探析——基于農(nóng)村公共衛(wèi)生服務(wù)體系現(xiàn)狀的調(diào)查分析[J];勞動保障世界(理論版);2011年08期

2 劉蘭劍;溫曉蘭;;大學(xué)生創(chuàng)業(yè)政策評價體系研究[J];廈門理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

3 錢f;陳云;;地方政府扶持大學(xué)生自主創(chuàng)業(yè)政策比較分析[J];杭州電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期

4 熊偉;;大學(xué)生創(chuàng)業(yè)政策體系的構(gòu)建框架與實(shí)施模式[J];陜西教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

5 李時椿;劉冠;;關(guān)于創(chuàng)業(yè)與創(chuàng)新的內(nèi)涵、比較與集成融合研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2007年16期

6 高建;蓋羅它;;國外創(chuàng)業(yè)政策的理論研究綜述[J];國外社會科學(xué);2007年01期

7 王瑞祥;政策評估的理論、模型與方法[J];預(yù)測;2003年03期

8 胡平仁;;政策評估的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年03期

，

本文編號：2017256