本文選題：全球價(jià)值鏈 + 附加值貿(mào)易��； 參考：《安徽大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著科技革命與產(chǎn)業(yè)變革的迅猛發(fā)展,全球價(jià)值鏈不斷深化與重塑,成為經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的重要特征。中國憑借勞動(dòng)力與資源優(yōu)勢(shì)逐步融入全球價(jià)值鏈。按傳統(tǒng)貿(mào)易數(shù)據(jù)核算,中國已經(jīng)成為世界第一出口大國,但是傳統(tǒng)貿(mào)易統(tǒng)計(jì)體系將出口產(chǎn)品所有價(jià)值都統(tǒng)計(jì)在價(jià)值鏈最后一個(gè)環(huán)節(jié),顯然會(huì)高估中國真實(shí)貿(mào)易利得,無法體現(xiàn)中國在全球價(jià)值鏈中的地位。因此有必要從附加值貿(mào)易角度測(cè)算中國在全球價(jià)值鏈中的地位,探索中國真實(shí)貿(mào)易利得。本文基于OECD-WTO于2015年10月聯(lián)合發(fā)布的貿(mào)易附加值數(shù)據(jù)(TiVA),運(yùn)用GVC參與指數(shù)與GVC地位指數(shù)綜合測(cè)度中國整體,中國制造業(yè)以及服務(wù)業(yè)在全球價(jià)值鏈中的地位并進(jìn)行橫向與縱向比較。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),中國整體融入全球價(jià)值鏈程度較高,自2008年以來中國整體GVC參與指數(shù)均位于61個(gè)國家中首位,但較高的參與程度并沒有使中國在全球價(jià)值鏈中獲得較高的地位,2011年中國整體GVC地位指數(shù)位居第24位,處于全球價(jià)值鏈的中低端環(huán)節(jié)。隨著中國融入全球價(jià)值鏈程度的不斷加深,逐步實(shí)現(xiàn)資本、人才與技術(shù)積累,中國全球價(jià)值鏈地位有逐漸攀升的趨勢(shì)。在制造業(yè)方面,中國制造業(yè)GVC參與程度在61個(gè)國家中居于前列,但是制造業(yè)GVC地位指數(shù)位居第27位,仍位于全球價(jià)值鏈中低端位置。在制造業(yè)細(xì)分行業(yè)中,中國勞動(dòng)密集型制造業(yè)處于全球價(jià)值鏈中高端,而資本密集型制造業(yè)與知識(shí)密集型制造業(yè)在全球價(jià)值鏈地位上與發(fā)達(dá)國家相距甚遠(yuǎn),處于全球價(jià)值鏈的中低端。在服務(wù)業(yè)方面,中國服務(wù)業(yè)融入全球價(jià)值鏈程度不斷加深,在GVC地位指數(shù)層面也得到大幅提高,其中公共性服務(wù)業(yè)GVC地位指數(shù)最高,其次是消費(fèi)性服務(wù)業(yè),而生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)GVC地位指數(shù)最低。根據(jù)上述結(jié)果,從堅(jiān)持創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)、優(yōu)化制造業(yè)貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)、加大服務(wù)業(yè)開放力度、推動(dòng)制造業(yè)服務(wù)化等方面提出相應(yīng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology revolution and industry reform, the global value chain has been deepened and reshaped, which has become an important feature of economic globalization. With the advantage of labor and resources, China gradually integrates into the global value chain. According to traditional trade data, China has become the largest export country in the world, but the traditional trade statistics system counts all the value of export products in the last link of the value chain, which obviously overestimates the real trade benefits of China. China's position in the global value chain cannot be reflected. Therefore, it is necessary to measure China's position in global value chain from the perspective of value added trade, and to explore the real trade benefits of China. Based on the trade value added data jointly released by OECD-WTO in October 2015, this paper uses GVC participation Index and GVC status Index to comprehensively measure the status of China as a whole, manufacturing industry and service industry in global value chain, and make horizontal and vertical comparison. The study found that China's overall integration into the global value chain is relatively high. Since 2008, China's overall GVC participation index has ranked first out of 61 countries. However, the higher level of participation did not make China gain a higher position in the global value chain. In 2011, China's overall GVC status index ranked 24th and was at the middle and low end of the global value chain. With the deepening of China's integration into the global value chain and the gradual realization of capital, talent and technology accumulation, the status of China's global value chain is gradually rising. In the manufacturing sector, China's manufacturing GVC participation is among the highest in 61 countries, but the manufacturing GVC status index ranks 27th and remains at the low end of the global value chain. In the manufacturing sector segment, China's labor-intensive manufacturing industry is at the top end of the global value chain, while capital-intensive manufacturing and knowledge-intensive manufacturing are far from developed countries in terms of global value chain status. At the middle and low end of the global value chain. In the aspect of service industry, the degree of integration of Chinese service industry into the global value chain is deepening, and the level of GVC status index has also been greatly improved. Among them, the GVC status index of public service industry is the highest, followed by consumer service industry. The GVC status index of producer services was the lowest. According to the above results, some policy suggestions are put forward from the following aspects: persisting in innovation-driven, optimizing the trade structure of manufacturing industry, increasing the opening up of service industry and promoting the service-oriented manufacturing industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F424

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王鴻根,劉寄華,林思祖,吳旺民;營林經(jīng)濟(jì)效果與地位指數(shù)關(guān)系的探討[J];林業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;1991年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 本報(bào)評(píng)論員 邱登科;勿讓“老爸地位指數(shù)”回冷[N];民營經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李娜娜;中國在全球價(jià)值鏈中的地位測(cè)度研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2017年

2 周洋;地位指數(shù)信息圖譜的多尺度分析模型[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1864634