本文選題：工程量清單計價　切入點：綜合評標法　出處：《蘭州交通大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：當前,我國建設(shè)工程領(lǐng)域已經(jīng)全面進入了工程量清單計價時代,但是從招標的效果來看,工程量清單計價辦法的實施仍沒有達到更有利于市場競爭、降低造價的目的,而且又暴露了許多新問題,政府招投標監(jiān)管部門的治理效果也不理想,該領(lǐng)域始終呈現(xiàn)“道高一尺,魔高一丈”現(xiàn)象。所以當前制定更科學的評標方法顯得更有現(xiàn)實意義,以及如何營造公平、誠信、健康的招投標環(huán)境也是政府有關(guān)部門當前急需解決的問題。本文通過查閱近年來的相關(guān)文獻資料,對我國目前招標領(lǐng)域出現(xiàn)的諸如招標人、投標人、政府監(jiān)管、評標辦法等方面的問題進行梳理歸納。針對某省房屋建筑工程招投標領(lǐng)域?qū)嵭泄こ塘壳鍐斡媰r后的中標情況進行統(tǒng)計,并對相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)進行整理,在此基礎(chǔ)上引入中標價限價偏差率的概念,用直方圖法將中標價限價偏差率按照中標項目數(shù)進行統(tǒng)計分析,中標價限價偏差率分布呈現(xiàn)嚴重的正偏態(tài),而且不同投資規(guī)模下的中標價限價偏差率呈現(xiàn)相似的分布,從統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)可以分析出90%以上項目的中標價限價偏差率在3%以內(nèi)。這種中標價限價偏差率小的結(jié)論與正常的正態(tài)分布相悖,所以當前市場狀況明顯不符合常規(guī)。分析產(chǎn)生該現(xiàn)象的原因:一方面是工程量清單計價下的綜合評標法存在嚴重缺陷,投標總報價未作為評標指標;另一方面是招標市場可能存在較嚴重的圍標、串標及大幅度壓低招標控制價等違法、違規(guī)行為。這種現(xiàn)象不僅會導致招標人遭受嚴重經(jīng)濟損失,還會嚴重地侵害相關(guān)市場主體的合法利益,破壞招投標領(lǐng)域中公平自由的競爭秩序,妨礙招投標競爭機制功能的發(fā)揮。對于當前招投標領(lǐng)域存在的諸多問題,如若得以有效解決,需進一步完善招投標中的評標體系建設(shè),評標體系構(gòu)建應能覆蓋影響評標結(jié)果的主要環(huán)節(jié),論文提出了一種新型評標體系,包含建設(shè)工程評標辦法體系、建設(shè)工程信息平臺體系、建設(shè)工程誠信評價體系、建設(shè)工程評標保障體系四個方面,并進一步對各體系的內(nèi)容進行分析與構(gòu)建,從而為解決當前招投標過程中存在的問題,提供解決思路。
[Abstract]:At present, the field of construction engineering in our country has entered an era of bill of quantities valuation in an all-round way. However, from the effect of bidding, the implementation of valuation method of bill of quantities has not reached the goal of more favorable to market competition and lower cost.But also exposed many new problems, the government bidding supervision department's governance effect is also not ideal, this field always presents "the road is one foot, the evil is high" the phenomenon.Therefore, it is of more practical significance to establish a more scientific bid evaluation method, and how to create a fair, honest and healthy bidding environment is also a problem that government departments urgently need to solve.By referring to the relevant literature in recent years, this paper summarizes the problems in the field of bidding in China, such as tenderer, bidder, government supervision, bid evaluation method and so on.According to the statistics of the winning bid in the bidding field of a certain province, the paper introduces the concept of the deviation rate of the middle price limit price, which is based on the statistical analysis of the relevant data.According to the number of winning bid items, the deviation rate of the price limit is statistically analyzed by histogram method. The distribution of the deviation rate of the price limit in the bid price shows a serious positive deviation, and the deviation rate of the price limit under different investment scale shows a similar distribution.From the statistical data, we can find out that the deviation rate of the middle price limit price of more than 90% items is less than 3%.This conclusion is contrary to the normal distribution, so the current market situation is obviously out of order.The causes of this phenomenon are analyzed: on the one hand, there are serious defects in the comprehensive bid evaluation method under the valuation of bill of quantities, and the total bid quotation is not regarded as the evaluation index; on the other hand, there may be serious surrounding bids in the bidding market.String bid and greatly reduce the bid control price and other illegal, illegal behavior.This phenomenon will not only cause the tenderer to suffer serious economic losses, but also will seriously infringe on the legitimate interests of the relevant market subjects, destroy the fair and free competition order in the bidding field, and hinder the function of the bidding competition mechanism.If the problems in the current bidding field are solved effectively, it is necessary to further improve the construction of bid evaluation system in bidding. The construction of bid evaluation system should cover the main links that affect the result of bid evaluation.This paper puts forward a new bidding evaluation system, which includes four aspects: construction engineering bid evaluation method system, construction engineering information platform system, construction project integrity evaluation system, construction engineering bid evaluation guarantee system.Furthermore, the contents of each system are analyzed and constructed so as to solve the problems existing in the process of bidding and offer solutions.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F284

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡潔芳;;不合理的中標價產(chǎn)生的原因及解決措施研究[J];建材與裝飾(中旬刊);2007年07期

2 ;“中標價”折了誰[J];領(lǐng)導決策信息;2010年36期

3 金月;還拍賣以真實[J];汽車與配件;2000年22期

4 孫長江;;建設(shè)工程不合理中標價的產(chǎn)生和解決辦法[J];石河子科技;2009年04期

5 ;再問高藥價[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2011年46期

6 趙宇舟;;建設(shè)工程中標價不合理性探源[J];科技風;2011年09期

7 周秀峰;;工程招投標中標價研究[J];價值工程;2013年15期

8 沙僧;;治理商業(yè)賄賂任重道遠[J];今日新疆;2006年07期

9 劉亞紅;;市場機制下不合理中標價的危害及解決途徑[J];甘肅科技縱橫;2013年09期

10 張正蕓;論水運工程概算與中標價之差[J];水運工程;2003年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 記者 江濟申;最低中標價1.38萬元[N];解放日報;2000年

2 早報記者 錢嬋娟 欒曉娜;本月私車額度中標價意外沖高[N];東方早報;2011年

3 萬吉彥;藥品中標價緣何高得如此離譜[N];甘肅日報;2011年

4 本報記者 周琦;限價29元藥品中標價飆升至46元[N];法制日報;2013年

5 胥會云;上海私車額度拍賣中標價有望回落[N];第一財經(jīng)日報;2008年

6 陳惟;上海私車牌中標價驟降[N];文匯報;2008年

7 早報記者 錢嬋娟邋實習生 陳至樂;7月私車額度投放6800個 中標價看跌[N];東方早報;2008年

8 王峰;中標價成暫估價現(xiàn)象亟待引起重視[N];中國審計報;2008年

9 記者 姚嘉 通訊員 陳明孝;海南:政府采購中標價比市場低近三成[N];中國紀檢監(jiān)察報;2010年

10 早報記者 錢嬋娟　欒曉娜;私車額度中標價創(chuàng)35月新高[N];東方早報;2010年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 王宏輝;建設(shè)工程招標投標中的評標體系研究[D];蘭州交通大學;2016年

，

本文編號：1729362